Conservapedia:AFD Reparative therapy
From Conservapedia
Reparative therapy
None educational, biased, faulty. 3 Examples of biased editing and misuse of sources Talk:Reparative therapy. RobS 13:02, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
Delete:Now the whole thing is biased.-AmesGyo! 17:29, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
- Don't wish to defend your own edits, huh? RobS 17:32, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
Keep:Just because it is biased doesn't mean it can't be fixed. Also, I don't see the point of deleting articles when they are clearly going to be recreated again. (Reparative "therapy" being a significant political/cultural issue involving homosexuality.) --Sulgran 01:25, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Keep: but not in its current form. Needs a major overhauling (hey, just like Ames seemed to be doing!) and much more content!
Comment: It would appear that once again a more concise, less biased, better structured article is going to be scrapped rather than added to. The current revision (22:26, 30 April 2007 Ed Poor) has little of the content that some of the previous versions had. I would also point out that the examples of biased editing seem very tenuous and certainly don't require the revert of the entire article, which seems to have happened here. MatteeNeutra 12:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Keep: I don't understand any of the 'reasons' given for deletion. Is the topic unsuitable, the writing bad, or what? --Ed Poor 21:49, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
