Category talk:Novels

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. IndianaJ 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Not all books are novels. I think it's a useful sub-category. Dadsnagem2 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. IndianaJ 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
Novels is a sub-category of Fiction which is a sub-category of Books. Dadsnagem2 17:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
Deliciously convulted. Shall we go about moving fictional entries from Books to Novels, then? IndianaJ 17:46, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
Not my call, but I think the current scheme makes sense. Dadsnagem2 17:50, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
How does having some fiction novels in one category and some in another with no overlap make sense? IndianaJ 18:03, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
It doesn't. All novels should be in the category Novels. Dadsnagem2 22:40, 29 April 2008 (EDT)