Class of one

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

"Class of one" is a legal argument under the Equal Protection Clause whereby a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."[1]

Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence[2]

References

  1. Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000).
  2. Christian Heritage Acad. v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8186 (10th Cir. Apr. 9, 2007).

See also

  • Pignanelli v. Pueblo School Dist. No. 60, (C.A.10 (Colo.))
Personal tools