Historical revisionism

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Historical revisionism involves either the illegitimate distortion of the historical record or a careful and more objective re-examination of the historical data about a historical event or events.

Those who engage in denialism often pose as historical revisionists in order to cloak their motivations. A term for engaging in denialism when reporting false histories is the term historical negationism. For example, Holocaust deniers engage in historical negationism.

Howard Zinn is often charged with being guilty of historical revisionism (with his book A People's History of the United States being the most infamous example). The Democrat Party has also been guilty of historical revisionism by denying its racist history and present, as well as claiming on the party's website that "On every civil rights issue, Democrats have led the fight",[1] a blatant lie as well as an attempt to take credit for the work the Republican Party has done for civil rights and to battle Democrat racism and discrimination since its foundation.

Atheism and illegitimate historical revisionism

Atheists commonly engage in historical revisionism in order to illegitimately distort the historical record (see: Atheism and historical revisionism).

See also

References

  1. The Democrat Race Lie at Black & Right