From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Reprocessed Mariner 10 data was used to produce this image of Mercury. The smooth band is an area of which no images were taken.
Name of discoverer Known to ancients
Name origin Roman messenger god
and prince of thieves
Orbital characteristics
Primary Sun
Order from primary 1
Perihelion 46,000,000 km (0.307 AU)
Aphelion 70,000,000 km (0.468 AU)
Semi-major axis 57,909,175 km (0.387 AU)
Titius-Bode prediction 0.4 AU
Orbital eccentricity 0.20563069
Sidereal year 87.96934 da (0.241 a)
Synodic year 115.8776 da (0.317 a)
Avg. orbital speed 47.36 km/s
Inclination 7.00487° to the ecliptic
Rotational characteristics
Sidereal day 58.6462 da
Solar day 175.93868 da
Axial tilt
Physical characteristics
Mass 3.30 * 1023 kg (5.522% earth)
Density 5427 kg/m³
Mean radius 2439.7 km
Surface gravity 2.78 m/s² (0.283 g)
Escape speed 4.25 km/s
Surface area 75,000,000 km² (14.704% earth)
Minimum temperature 90 K
Mean temperature 452 K
Maximum temperature 700 K
Number of moons None known
Composition Iron, Silicate
Color Reddish
Magnetic flux density 0.033 G (3.3 * 10-6 T)[2]
Magnetic dipole moment at present 3.8 * 1019 N-m/T[1]
Magnetic dipole moment at creation 7.5 * 1022 N-m/T[3]
Decay time 812.6 a[4]
Half life 563.3 a[4]
This article is about the planet Mercury. For information about the chemical element see Mercury (element).
For information about the NASA project, see Project Mercury.

Mercury is the smallest planet in the Solar System, and it is the closest to the Sun. It orbits the Sun in 88 (Earth) days. It rotates on its axis every 58.6 days,[5] which is 3 rotations for every two orbits (called "3:2 resonance"). It can be seen from Earth only at sunrise and sunset.[6]

Mercury is one of the five brightest planets.


Ancient History

As with the other planets of the solar system, it was named after a Roman mythological figure, in this case the messenger god Mercury who is known as Hermes in Greek.

In the pre-Christian era, the Greeks actually gave the planet two different names, as it was believed to be two different objects. The ancients did not realize that it could alternately appear on one side of the Sun and then the other. Mercury was called Hermes when in the evening sky, but was known as Apollo when it appeared in the morning. It is said that Pythagoras, about the fifth century B.C., pointed out that they were one and the same.[6]


Mercury's core is made of molten metal, much like the Earth's. The molten Iron core generates the planet's magnetic field.

Orbital oddities

Mercury has a very elliptical orbit. At its farthest distance from the Sun, it is nearly 50% farther than at its nearest distance to the Sun. [7]

The precession of Mercury's eccentric orbit was detectable to 19th century astronomers.[8][9]

It was the study of this planet's orbit that Albert Einstein claimed to help confirm the General Theory of Relativity.[10][11] Specifically, Mercury's perihelion precesses by 5599.7 arc-seconds per century, whereas Newtonian physics alone would predict 5558.8 (comprised of the gravitational pull of the other planets on top of axial precession). This gives a discrepancy of -40.9 between theoretical models and real observations.

Astronomers of the period hypothesized either an asteroid belt or another planet (which they named Vulcan) inside Mercury's orbit. Einstein's second-order correction to Mercury's orbit supposedly accounts for 43 arc-seconds of precession and obviated the need to look for any unseen asteroids or innermost planet.[12][8][9] However, the theoretical error in the relativity calculation (stated to be around 0.04[13]) is much less than the discrepancy which results (2.1 arc-seconds). So, while scientists tell us that the theory of relativity solved the problem perfectly, elementary analysis of the figures indicates that it only luckily landed in the ballpark, and is still out by around 50 times the supposed tolerance in the calculations.

Mercury has more or less no atmosphere, and many craters. [14] It has no known moons.

Magnetic Field

A curiosity of the planet is its magnetic field, which is about 1% that of Earth's. Scientists were perplexed to discover its existence, speculating that planet's outer core consisted of liquid iron. However, because it is relatively small and hot, such an outer core would long ago have expired. That Mercury is so intensely cratered would also suggest that Mercury should long ago have given up its magnetic field because of its extreme apparent age.

Thus, according to current scientific understandings, the existence of Mercury's magnetic field presents a serious theoretical problem for uniformitarian models of the creation of the Solar System.[15][16] The problem of Mercury's magnetic field is more acute when one considers that Mars, which is slightly larger than Mercury and spins much faster, has a much weaker magnetic field.

Creationist Russell Humphreys has an alternative theory: that planetary magnetic fields do not form by dynamo action, and Mercury's relatively wide and conductive core has preserved its magnetic field. The cores of Mars and Venus are smaller, and thus the magnetic fields have decayed more rapidly.[3] Nevertheless, the decay of Mercury's magnetic field, according to Humphreys, is quite rapid.

Accordingly, in 1984 Humphreys boldly declared:

Mercury's decay rate is so rapid that some future probe could detect it fairly soon. In 1990 the planet's magnetic moment should be 1.8 percent smaller than its 1975 value.[3]

In fact, according to Humphreys' extrapolations of the decay time and half-life of the magnetic field of Mercury, the magnetic dipole moment in 2008 should be four percent smaller than that measured in 1975 by Mariner 10. Specifically, this should be (4.5 +/- 0.25) * 1019 N-m/T.

On January 14, 2008, MESSENGER made rendezvous with Mercury and measured its magnetic field. This rocket probe's measurements are consistent with a magnetic dipole moment of (3.8 +/- 0.7) * 1019 N-m/T. This represents a significant decline from the Mariner 10 measurement, because the two measurements differ by more than the sum of their respective tolerances. More to the point, the higher tolerance range of the current measurement lies well within the predicted magnetic dipole moment that Mercury should have at present. If, on the other hand, the true measurement is less than predicted, that would pose an even greater problem for uniformitarian astrophysics, because such a rapid decay would be utterly inconsistent with an age for Mercury of 4.6 billion years. It would present no problem with the Humphreys model, but would suggest that the core conductivity and/or conductive mass of Mercury is less than Humphreys initially supposed.[1]


External links


  1. 1.0 1.1 Humphreys, D. R. "Mercury's Magnetic Field is Young!" Creation Ministries International, August 26, 2008. Accessed October 2, 2008.
  2. Williams, David R. "Mercury Fact Sheet." National Space Science Data Center, NASA, November 30, 2007. Accessed May 29, 2008.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Humphreys, D. R. "The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields." Creation Research Society Quarterly 21(3), December 1984. Accessed April 29, 2008.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Calculated from observed present magnetic dipole moment and expected magnetic dipole moment at creation.
  5. "The theory that Mercury is in synchronous rotation with its orbital motion was shattered in 1965. Astronomers Gordon Pettengill and Rolf Dyce used a radio telescope to make radar observations of Mercury’s spin rate. They found that Mercury’s rotation period is only 58.6 Earth days, not the 88 days accepted for nearly a century." [1]
  6. 6.0 6.1 Seeing Mercury at sunset, April 2003
  8. 8.0 8.1 Wudka, Jose. "Precession of the perihelion of Mercury." September 24, 1998. Accessed April 17, 2008.
  9. 9.0 9.1 "Mercury: Mercury in tests of relativity." In "Mercury," Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 17 April 2008
  10. Testing general relativity European Space Agency Accessed July 16 2007
  11. Albert Einstein Fizički odsjek Accessed July 16 2007
  12. Hartnett, John. Starlight, Time, and the New Physics. Creation Book Publishers, 2007, pp. 34-36. ISBN 9780949906687.
  13. Iorio, L., On the possibility of measuring the solar oblateness and some relativistic effects from planetary ranging, 2004
  14. John Gribbin, Companion to the Cosmos (Little, Brown & Company, 1996)
  15. Psarris, Spike, Our Solar System: Evidence for Design, Seattle Creation Conference, 2006.
  16. Franco, Lucia M. "Lecture 10.1: Mercury." Astronomy 100 at Indiana University Northwest, Indiana University, 1996. Accessed April 17, 2008.

Personal tools