Michelle Obama and liberal elitism

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Michelle Obama is reported to have worn $540 shoes to a food bank.[1][2]

Michelle Obama's liberal elitism is not surprising given the high degree of liberal elitism that has been displayed by Barack Obama.

Contents

Michelle Obama and Patient Dumping Allegations

Michelle Malkin and others allege that Michelle Obama created a patient dumping scheme for a Chicago health care facility.[3][4][5] In March of 2009, the American Thinker wrote:

Substantial coverage was given to a recent indictment of the program by the American College of Emergency Physicians. ACEP's president, Dr. Nick Jouriles, released a statement suggesting that the initiative comes "dangerously close to ‘patient dumping,' a practice made illegal by the Emergency Medical Labor and Treatment Act, and reflected an effort to ‘cherry pick' wealthy patients over poor."[6]

Michelle Obama and Food Bank Incident

In May of 2008, the following was reported:

Michelle Obama continued to flaunt her money recently, as she made fun of homeless people by wearing $540 shoes to a food bank.

What a sick day and age we live in when millionaires endlessly gallivant around the globe in their jets and fancy clothes, but still make sure to remind the poor of just how little they have in pocket.

This is just more proof of how the liberal elite live these extravagant lives and are not in touch with us common people. We do all the hard work of fighting wars and building up this country, while they enjoy the fruits of our labor and control all the wealth.

My stomach churns with disgust because of these types of liberal antics and disregard for human life. For just about $5 a day, you can feed a starving child in Africa. With $540, Michelle Obama could by a struggling American family a month’s worth of groceries.[7][8]

Powerline offers the following criticism of Michelle Obama:

She says that she and Barack were born to parents of modest means, not with "silver spoons" in their mouths. Nobody knows the trouble they've seen. The burden of paying for her undergraduate education at Princeton and her law school education at Harvard has scarred her. It remains a motif of her stump speech. No one is accorded a chance to ask her if she thought about attending the University of Illinois, or if she's grateful for any of the financial assistance that facilitated her and her husband's attendance at the finest institutions of higher learning in the United States.[9]

See also

References

Personal tools