Creationism

From Conservapedia

(Redirected from Origin debate)
Jump to: navigation, search
creationism
Michelangelo's painting of the creation of the Sun and Moon.

Creationism is the belief that the earth and universe and the various kinds of animals and plants were created by God or some other supreme being. Those that hold the views of Creationism are referred to as Creationists.[1] Creationism is contrary to the religion of evolutionism.[2]

Biblical creationism is primarily based on: the compelling testimony provided by God's wondrous creation; the historical and prophetic evidence supporting the Bible; religious belief and on the scientific evidence provided through creation science. Biblical creationism, which includes the idea that man is created in the image of God, has profoundly affected Western Civilization in a positive way. Some of the areas it has benefited Western culture is in the areas of human rights and law, ethics and morality, economics, science, and the arts (see also: Christianity and science and Social effects of the theory of evolution).[3]

Creation Ministries International, a leading biblical creation organization, declared:

Creationist research is having a global effect that is worrying the atheists and secularists of this world. They have had it all their own way for over a century but things are slowly changing. For almost twenty five years now, Journal of Creation has been publishing cutting-edge creationist research that has been fueling the war against evolution, creating little fires all around the world, including Great Britain.

Atheist evangelist, Prof Richard Dawkins, speaking at the 20th anniversary of the Edinburgh International Science Festival in April 2008, said the rise of creationism in British schools raised a serious problem for science teachers.

It is a very worrying trend,’ he said, ‘and I think a lot of it has come over from America and Australia.’[4]

Within creationism in the Abrahamic religions, there are various ideas. In regards to those religions, one form of creationism holds that the earth is approximately 6,000 years old and is referred to as Young Earth Creationism. The other form of creationism is called Old Earth Creationism and holds that the earth and universe are billions of years old. Creationist scientists demonstrate that the first law of thermodynamics and second law of thermodynamics argue against an eternal universe and they also demonstrate that these laws point to the universe being supernaturally created. [5][6][7] Dr. Norman Geisler stated that "Both young- and old-earthers believe that God supernaturally, directly and immediately produced every kind of animal and human as separate and genetically distinct forms of life." [8] Dr. Norman Geisler also wrote that "both young- and old-earthers who are evangelical hold to the historicity of the Genesis account: They believe that Adam and Eve were literal people, the progenitors of the entire human race." [9] Creation scientists assert that the theory of evolution is in conflict with the evidence provided by the physical sciences and often cite secular scientific sources which agree with them on various points (for further details please see: theory of evolution).[10]

Those who hold to young earth creationism point out that nearly every culture in the world has a creation story and a flood story. [11][12][13][14][15] Many of these creation accounts and flood accounts have commonalities with the account given in the book of Genesis although gross differences exist also. [16][17][18] The Institute for Creation Research has taken the position that the similarities in regards to creation accounts to the Genesis account demonstrates that the main points of the Genesis account has been preserved. [19] In regards to the assertion that the similarities in flood stories around the world show common origin, young earth creationist particularly assert that there are strong similarities between the Genesis flood account and other world flood accounts. [20][21] Also, there are remarkable similarities between Native American creation myths and the biblical account given in Genesis concerning creation.[22]

Contents

Creationism and Controversy

Creationism and Intelligent Design

Believers in the Abrahamic faiths who hold to creationism believe that the natural world has been designed by God. Recently, there have been articles which were favorable to the intelligent design position in scientific journals which traditionally have favored the macroevolutionary position.[23] Believers in the Abrahamic faiths have points of agreement and disagreement with the intelligent design movement. They agree that the natural world has an intelligent cause and was designed as mentioned previously. However, some advocates of creationism believe that the intelligent design movement divorces the Creator from creation by not explicitly stating that the cause of creation is a supernatural being and also failing to state explicitly who that supernatural being is.[24]

There is considerable disagreement on whether or not intelligent design amounts to a form of creationism and if so, where to place it in comparison to the other forms of creationism. This is due to the concept having many different definitions and proponents espousing different ideas.

For example, one major proponent of Intelligent Design is Young Earth Creationist Paul Nelson, while Michael Behe, another major proponent, accepts common descent. William Dembski has stated unequivocally that Intelligent Design is not theistic evolution and they should not be considered the same[25]. Dembski has also asserted that Intelligent Design is the Logos in terms of information theory[26], while Dembski and others have given other definitions that do not include any specific theological references. Arguably, intelligent design can be summarized as the notion that at some point in the past, in some way, some entity (possibly God) created life, or altered life at some point, or created the universe to be compatible with life.

Behe and others have stated that Intelligent Design is not religious in nature but in the Dover trial, Judge John E. Jones III, a Republican and a US Federal District Judge, ruled as a one of his findings that Intelligent Design was essentially religious in nature. The opinion borrowed heavily from the ACLU's briefs. [27] The Kitzmiller vs. Dover case did not take into account that atheistic evolution is religious in nature.[28][29][30]

Creationists video evangelism

see also: Internet evangelism

Campus Crusade for Christ International (CCCI) is one of the world's largest evangelism organizations within Christendom and has over 25,000 full time missionaries. In 2006, Alan Beeber of CCCI predicted that internet evangelism will result in more conversion that all other forms of evangelism for CCCI combined.[31]

YouTube is a popular online video sharing site that provides a method distributing Christian/creationist videos across the world. The YouTube search engine is the second largest search engine in the world.[32] There is a widespread problem with atheist cyberbullying on YouTube toward Christian and creationist YouTube channels. CreationWiki has developed a web page entitled Creationist YouTube video designed to show creationists how to thwart atheist/evolutionist cyberbullies. Also, one popular Christian YouTube channel, shockofgod, was shut down several times by atheist cyberbullying through false reports but he was able to thwart their cyberbullying using some effective tactics.[33] These false reports are not isolated incidents, many atheists will try this deceitful tactic to block out Christianity and creation science.

Biblical creation publications

See also: Biblical creation journals

Some prominent biblical creation publications are given below:

Adherents and Opponents of Creationism

Traditionally, Judaism supported young earth creationism.[34] In addition, a majority of the early church fathers supported the young earth creationist view.[35] While Young Earth Creationism is prominent in many conservative Protestant denominations, theologically liberal Protestant and Jewish denominations generally reject it.[36][37][38] The Roman Catholic Church has a cautiously positive view of the theory of evolution. [39][40] Orthodox Judaism currently has diverse opinions regarding young earth creationism.[41] Ultra-Orthodox Judaism accepts young earth creationism.[42] Islam has a variety of opinions regarding creationism and the theory of evolution. [43]Atheists do not believe in young earth creationism and a vast majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position since World War II have been atheists.[44][45] Charles Darwin in his private diaries stated he was a materialist which a type of atheist. While agnostics do not believe in young earth creationism there have been some notable statements of skepticism regarding the theory of evolution from agnostics.[46][47] On the other hand, Thomas Huxley was a staunch proponent of the theory of evolution and he stated he was an agnostic. [48][49]

Global creationism

See also: Global creationism

Dr. Carl Wieland is the Managing Director of Creation Ministries International, a Christian ministry which is in four continents.

On October 4, 2014, the Vancouver Sun reported that evolutionism is rejected by hundreds of millions of evangelical Christians and Muslims around the world.[50]

Specifically, the Vancouver Sun declared:

Creationism, a religious world view that adamantly rejects Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, is on the rise among evangelical Protestants and most of the world’s Muslims.

It is not only the majority of residents in Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Indonesia and Turkey who strongly reject the teaching that humans and other species evolved over millions of years from less complex creatures. So do tens of millions of evangelical Christians in North America (as well as South America and Africa).

Overall, [Nidhal Guessoum, a Middle Eastern physics and astronomy professor] who teaches at the American University of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates, estimates roughly 60 per cent of the world’s Muslims are creationists, including many living in the U.S. and Canada.

Even though poll results about evolution vary based on the questions asked, Salman Hameed reported in the journal Science that strong anti-evolution majorities exist in Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt and Pakistan. The latter is among Canada’s top six source countries for immigrants...

An Angus-Reid survey found 43 per cent of Americans accept the creationist teaching that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, which means they reject the...view the universe began roughly 13 billion years ago.[51]

Recommended books

See also

External links

Young Earth Creationist Organizations

Anti-Darwinism/creationist, French/English website:

Young earth articles and other resources:

Old Earth Creationists

Reasons To Believe, an Old Earth Creationist Ministry

References

  1. "creationist." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 21 Mar. 2007. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creationist>.
  2. 15 questions for evolutionists - Question 15 deals with the fact that evolution is a religion
  3. http://creation.com/growth-of-creation-science-in-uk-worries-prof-dawkins
  4. Evidences for God From Space—Laws of Science
  5. Thompson, Bert, So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!, 2001 (Apologetics Press)
  6. http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html
  7. http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/science/SC0305W3.htm
  8. http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/science/SC0305W3.htm
  9. http://www.creation.com/content/view/21
  10. http://www.katapi.org.uk/BAndS/ChII.htm
  11. http://www.icr.org/article/108/
  12. http://www.icr.org/article/570/
  13. http://library.thinkquest.org/18757/creation.htm
  14. http://www.grisda.org/origins/17051.htm
  15. http://www.katapi.org.uk/BAndS/ChII.htm
  16. http://www.icr.org/article/108/
  17. http://www.icr.org/article/570/
  18. http://www.icr.org/article/108/
  19. http://www.icr.org/article/570/
  20. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/flood-legends
  21. Indian creation myths - CMI
  22. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640
  23. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/intelligent-design-movement
  24. What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki
  25. [1] Signs of Intelligence: A Primer on the Discernment of Intelligent Design Touchstone Magazine, Volume 12, Issue 4 July-August 1999
  26. [2]
  27. http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion
  28. http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/Kitzmiller%27s_error_summary.pdf
  29. http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/Kitzmiller%27s_Error.pdf
  30. http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/pdf/issues/LWP0206.pdf
  31. http://www.tgdaily.com/trendwatch-features/39777-youtube-surpasses-yahoo-as-world%E2%80%99s-2-search-engine
  32. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kax-zAJxi-U
  33. James-Griffiths, James,Creation days and Orthodox Jewish tradition Creation 26(2):53–55, March 2004.
  34. Bradshaw, Robert I., Creationism & the Early Church, chapter 3, The Days of Genesis 1.
  35. Morris, Henry, Old-Earth Creationism Back to Genesis April 1997.
  36. What Conservative Protestants Believe (beliefnet).
  37. Jarvik, Elaine, Beliefs on Darwin's evolution vary from religion to religion Deseret Morning News 19 January 2006.
  38. http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-04-11-pope-evolution-creation_N.htm
  39. Heneghan, Tom, Catholics and Evolution: Interview with Cardinal Christoph Schönborn (beliefnet).
  40. Rabbinical Council of America, Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design.
  41. Winnick, Pamela R.,Evolutionary War Toledo City Paper, March 7 2002.
  42. http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_151_200/muslim_responses_to_evolution.htm
  43. Batten, Don, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32 December 1997.
  44. http://www.creationists.org/nas.html
  45. Woodward, Thomas E., Doubts About Darwin (Apologetics Press).
  46. Agnostic Philosopher Caught in Conspiracy to Question Darwinism Evolution News & Views, (Discovery Institute).
  47. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1025
  48. http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od171/desmond171.htm
  49. Evolution rejected by hundreds of millions of Muslims and evangelicals, Vancouver Sun, October 4, 2014
  50. Evolution rejected by hundreds of millions of Muslims and evangelicals, Vancouver Sun, October 4, 2014. 9:12 am
  51. http://www.creationengineeringconcepts.org/index.php?p=1_35_THE-CREATION-DIALOGUES
  52. http://www.christianbook.com/dialogues-american-association-advancement-evolution-christianity/j-d-mitchell/9781414118000/pd/118002
Personal tools