User contributions
From Conservapedia
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 15:03, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Toxin (Copyedit, some unusual grammar used, most of the article has swapped around to make it more understandable, and some information has been added.)
- 14:58, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jeffsang (not sarcastic at all, the site is obviously leftist, and contrary to the bible. Plus, non-American)
- 14:55, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→Possibly: this is why the topics aren't appropriate for CP)
- 14:47, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Clostridium botulinum (add some info, botulin (the nerve toxin) is perhaps the strongest in the world)
- 14:36, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Puellanivis (→90/10 Rule: I am a positive contributor at CP)
- 14:22, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jeffsang (Not sarcastic or silly, but meant honestly, however, it's a very liberal POV)
- 14:19, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (The problem here is a "presumption of absolute truth")
- 14:11, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→Possibly: "depth" is less the goal here, than presenting the conservative view point. Pop culture is not an important topic of an encyclopedia by CP standards.)
- 13:03, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Physicsnut (my apologies as well...)
- 00:38, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:DanH (→User "Awesome": any way to note a block should be given?)
- 00:27, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (→Reversion explained: point taken, my revert should have been good, and why liberals are attracted to this article)
- 00:20, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) New! User talk:Zmidponk (no, seriously... just shut up...)
- 00:17, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Puellanivis (well, they're just stupid, liberal or not...)
- 23:54, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: go away)
- 23:52, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: go away)
- 23:45, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Earth (Undo revision 354754 by Special:Contributions/Jesusrules4ever (User talk:Jesusrules4ever) rv liberal vandalism, user is mocking and hiding behind a "christian" username)
- 23:44, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: agenda or not, the Bible is the truth, and you're wrong.)
- 23:42, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde)
- 23:20, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: everyone has an agenda, just because you think you don't, doesn't mean you don't. It's the same as an accent.)
- 23:18, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: The Bible, seriously... it's the truth here)
- 23:13, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: uh... DUH! the Bible is truth, and it says he's the only Son of God.)
- 22:33, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: really? really? the credibility is everywhere!)
- 22:30, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: *sigh* they're really that retarded, right?)
- 22:07, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success: not sarcasm)
- 22:01, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:DanH (User "Awesome")
- 21:59, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Bill Ritter (Undo revision 354695 by Special:Contributions/Awesome (User talk:Awesome) rv liberal vandalism)
- 21:58, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Colorado (Undo revision 354692 by Special:Contributions/Awesome (User talk:Awesome) rv vandalism, report for block?)
- 21:57, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World: *ick* :( they're everywhere)
- 21:54, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: another dumb liberal)
- 21:51, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success: are all liberals this stupid?)
- 21:22, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (rv, STOP it with the liberal stuff!)
- 21:21, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (stop pressing your liberal views!)
- 20:52, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (→Pending research: again, this was a good edit... it's a stronger statement, and more accurate)
- 14:21, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (→Reversion explained: disagreement is irrelevant)
- 14:13, 18 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (→Reversion explained: Footnote only because he didn't believe in GR)
- 20:12, 17 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (→Philosophical Impact of Relativity: *sigh* that totally slipped through, sorry, some grammar work)
- 20:10, 17 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (→Philosophical Impact of Relativity: fix the wording... oy, he made a mess... I'll be rechecking this after I submit it)
- 20:04, 17 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (→Reversion explained: no technobabble please!)
- 20:02, 17 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Theory of relativity (→Reversion explained: stronger statement than "total failures")
- 20:00, 17 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (→Pending research: "total failures" is just not as powerful as "it's crappy science already, and need a lot of stuff to make them work")
- 20:41, 12 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Ich bin ein Berliner (German clarification from someone who speaks German)
- 17:15, 11 December 2007 (hist) (diff) m Theory of relativity (→Ostensible Paradoxes: "speed of like" -> "speed of light")
- 19:27, 10 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Theory of relativity (→Ostensible Paradoxes: Speed of light in an object is less than the speed of light in a vacuum, being able to decrease or increase the speed of light through an object is trivial.)
- 17:02, 10 December 2007 (hist) (diff) New! User:Puellanivis (Initial page content.) (top)
- 14:48, 10 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User:Ed Poor/math (Some more statistics on Wikipedia)
- 19:09, 7 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Puellanivis (GENDER-related topics)
- 18:40, 7 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Lynn Conway (Article has been merged with "The Man Who Would Be Queen") (top)
- 18:27, 7 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Lynn Conway (→My recent edits and justification: Conservapedia may not accept transsexualism, but the US legal system does. Considering that we're subject to that law, we should likely follow it.)
- 16:50, 7 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Lynn Conway (Proper ref, and giving DEFAULTSORT as per manual of style)
- 16:34, 7 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Transgender activism (Sex ed should not be given on Conservapedia. In order to detail the distinctions of the groups mentioned requires an invasive presentation of sexual information.)
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
