User contributions
From Conservapedia
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 14:47, 6 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins ((Reverting unproven, untrue, inaccurate version))
- 14:39, 6 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (Undo revision 385126 by Special:Contributions/Aschlafly (User talk:Aschlafly))
- 14:38, 6 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 14:20, 6 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (Nobody actually presenting evidence that my edits are wrong, thus I conclude they aren't)
- 14:19, 6 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:26, 30 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:22, 30 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:18, 30 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 20:54, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 20:22, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 20:21, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 20:20, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 20:06, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 20:03, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 18:21, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (You are still in contravention of the Commandments I mentioned earlier. If you block me, that only shows your utter hypocrisy.)
- 18:00, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk (→WARNING)
- 17:49, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (8 pages of talk in which there is no evidence of Dawkins 'not being a proper professor', despite repeated requests by several people for such to be provided, and much evidence provided that he is)
- 15:43, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (You are in contravention of Conservapedia Commandments 1, 2 and 5. You are the owner of the site. Abide by the Commandments or change them.)
- 15:03, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Richard Dawkins (To date, there is STILL no evidence backing up the claim of Dawkins 'not being a proper professor', and plenty of evidence saying he is, so this error is now corrected)
- 12:18, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:17, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:17, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 12:00, 29 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 17:24, 27 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Video game controversy
- 17:24, 27 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Video game controversy
- 22:06, 25 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Richard Dawkins (→To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 22:05, 25 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Richard Dawkins (To Clarify This Whole Mess)
- 19:13, 23 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Dungeons and Dragons (→Nice picture)
- 18:07, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Homosexuality and Scotland (Undo revision 370322 by Special:Contributions/Iduan (User talk:Iduan) The only 'cited' claim that is in any way relevant to homosexuality is disproved by it's own cited source.)
- 17:59, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Homosexuality and Scotland (→Erm, what?)
- 17:55, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Homosexuality and Scotland (→Erm, what?)
- 17:53, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Homosexuality and Scotland (→Scotland and Cultural Controversies)
- 17:52, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Homosexuality and Scotland (See Talk)
- 17:52, 13 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Homosexuality and Scotland (Erm, what?)
- 16:22, 8 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Immutability (Revert not working the way I am used to, so just copied and pasted old version)
- 16:17, 8 January 2008 (hist) (diff) New! Talk:Immutability (New page: Obviously, Aschlafly, you and I have VERY different understandings of the word 'speculation'. Somehow, me putting that others have a particular view is 'speculation', but you implying the...) (top)
- 16:17, 8 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Immutability (Undo revision 366730 by Special:Contributions/Aschlafly (User talk:Aschlafly) You accuse me of speculation then edit it to include speculation. Physician, heal thyself.)
- 15:48, 8 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Immutability
- 15:39, 8 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Immutability (In the comments about homosexuality being immutable, clarified that it's not a black and white issue)
- 19:34, 4 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:British Broadcasting Corporation (→Bias)
- 14:19, 1 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Element (An element, by definition, is NOT a 'chemical compound'.)
- 13:29, 1 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Native element (Dunno where you dug up that textbook, but two of the listed elements are NOT elements - they are alloys of two or more elements)
- 18:03, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) World of Warcraft (→Alliance)
- 18:01, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) World of Warcraft (→Terminology)
- 17:58, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) World of Warcraft (→Terminology)
- 17:56, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:World of Warcraft (→Deleted Incorrect Info)
- 17:50, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:World of Warcraft (Deleted Incorrect Info)
- 17:50, 27 December 2007 (hist) (diff) World of Warcraft (Corrected/clarified a few things)
- 15:23, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (→The Annals of the World)
- 10:26, 19 December 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Zmidponk
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
