Talk:Anonymous

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

'This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, sarcastic mockery, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments.'

So I read the Commandments, and found that the only issue from my edit was the lack of references. Something I shall fix if necessary.

I feel my only crime was not agreeing with the overarching bias of this site.

Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

I don't really know much about this purported group, but from what I can find it seems to be a name thrown about by kids who spend too much time on the internet and enjoy pointless vandalism. This article makes them sound almost noble, which is clearly wrong. I think it's you who is biased - take a look around CP and you'll see what an open-minded group of editors can do. Jcw 10:28, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
I have been looking around. I changed this article from a simple statement calling the group a bunch of terrorists to one which lists what they have done. I have tried to include the official opposition by non-government groups (and even included the statements of the Pirate Party). I have tried to keep my opinion out of by merely stating what we can know. They have been known to take part in a series of political motives. I could add a part which states the opinions of the public but that is kind of irrelevant to the actual facts about them. If I was to talk about Quantum Loop Gravity, I wouldn't go out and ask the public what they think of it because they won't really understand it. The same applies with groups who are portrayed by the media as a bunch of terrorists (despite being viewed as 'heroes' when they opposed Scientology). I'll edit in some stuff about the opinion that they are criminals.
Anonymous is a very real online terrorist group which engages in DDoS attacks and other forms of network abuse. That said, the user that Mr. Schlafly just blocked is clearly one of them. Before they accuse us of censoring us, that username would have been blocked at Wikipedia too because it was promotional. DMorris 10:58, 6 June 2011 (EDT)

Picture ?

Would it be possible to upload a picture of a Guy Fawkes mask for this article ?--PhilipN 22:46, 17 November 2011 (EST)

Personal tools