Talk:Bush v. Gore

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

It's not "intervening" in the sense of "sticking your nose in, where it does not belong". The job of the Supreme Court is to handle stuff like this. --Ed Poor Talk 07:20, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

Some people didn't think that the courts should stick their noses in. Your edit restricts "many people" to just Democrats. Read the next 2 sentences. RSchlafly 12:07, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

Oh boy, my first revert! (See history) Just out of curiousity, what was the reason?--Frey 19:38, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

Oh. (see updated history) OK, never mind. I clarified the link a little, so people will know what they're getting into.--Frey 00:44, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
The article is a silly leftist rant, with nothing of substance. It keep saying things like "the five Justices clearly are criminals". It does not belong. RSchlafly 21:22, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
OK. Any objections to using it as a reference for Democrats being unhappy, or should I find something else?--Frey 21:36, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
Personally, I would find something else. There are Democrats who wrote articles or quoted statistics without resorting to ranting. Learn together 21:43, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

Ye can revert page all ye want, but ye cannea change the facts laddie! - TheBluejay, 22:30 May 2009

Your text was unsourced, and most of it was false. Blacks voted heavily in the election, and were not systematically excluded. RSchlafly 21:29, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
Personal tools