Talk:Canada

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Photo

The photo in the section Army or military, i can't remember, shows members of the Afgan Army, with one canadian soldier in the background. If someone would address this it would be great. I just joind cp and am not comfortable uploading photos Sy20 21:45, 5 January 2012 (EST)

No Room For Unsubstantiated Claims

Why is it necessary for me to keep correcting the work of vandals? This page is not for comparing Canada to the United States. This is a page for reporting facts about the country. If I was so inclined, I could come up with some really nice things to say about Canada that make us look much better than the United States- but I don't. It's people that come in here and try to drag down my country that make their country look bad. Lose the attitude of superiority. This is not "An American Site". This is a wiki which is open to users around the world. If this site is to gain credibility, then it has to be balanced. --TrueGrit 23:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

About Canada

This is an encyclopedic entry on Canada. This not a page designed to highlight how the US is better than Canada. Please take your heads out of your hind quarters. --TrueGrit 12:44, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

"Socialist"

Canada is not a socialist country. The use of the word socialist is misleading as well, as socialism has connotations of Nazis and the Soviet Union, which Canada is very different from. RaymondZ 12:28, 9 December 2012 (EST)

Marijuana

On the subject of Canada exporting pot to the US, I don't see the big deal. It is fair to include that, as it is something that we aim to improve. You say we supply your 5% like its a bad thing? --TrueGrit 23:44, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

You should have seen waht was there before I softened it up a little. Jacobin 00:11, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Conversely, we should probably avoid putting in America exporting cocaine to Canada due to similar pettiness. User: Billytorbay

Canada's Response to SARS

Comparisons of the incidence of SARS in different jurisdictions is problematic, because it depends on health care professionals diagnosing the illness. In the US, for example, an unknown respiratory illness was reported which might have been diagnosed as SARS in Ontario. In fact, no real diagnosis of a "syndrome" can be made, because a syndrome is merely a collection of symptoms. Only when a virus or other cause is identified can a true diagnosis be made. The best known example of this is AIDS, which was later found to be caused by HIV infection.

During the epidemic, Chinese and American health officials may have wished to minimize its perceived gravity, while Toronto officials were more concerned with containing the actual illness. At the same time, the Canadian and Ontario governments largely ignored the problem, which they saw as a local matter.

The main article implies that Canada had a higher mortality rate for SARS because of its public health care system. While that is an interesting hypothesis, it would be helpful if the writer could provide a comparison of the treatment given to SARS victims to show how improved care in Ontario's hospitals could have improved the rate.

I agree whole heartedly. However, the problem we are left with is that what is there now is a compromise from the original contribution. A very bitter user contributed a handful of sections that made Canada look like the worst country in the world to live, and was rife with tabloidization. We need more editors to squeeze out those with fuzzy logic. --TrueGrit 15:44, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

The Sars section should be removed. It is one of the least relevant things about Canada or even Toronto. It's not topical. I'm sure even Torontonians have forgoten about it.

Top 10 places to live in the world

We really need a citation for that. According to whom? A travel magazine? The UN? DanH 18:51, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Human Trafficking

I do not believe that this fits in the article on Canada. It provides no information on Canada as a country, it just highlights some opportunities for improvement. It's not something that anyone would allow done to an article on the United States, so why allow it here? --TrueGrit 15:46, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Silliness in this entry

Why is it that most of the recent changes in this article have been people adding foolishness, malarkey, and drivel? That people like Crocoite, TK, Fox, Karajou, and RobS have had to devote so much time to repairing this article (and kudos to them for doing so) is particularly frustrating when you consider that there are still no entries for the NWT, Nunavut and most of the provincial capitals. As well, most of the articles about the provinces are quite minimal and need to be augmented. In addition, there is virtually no mention on Canada's significant contributions to WWI and WWII in those articles. There is lots of work to be done here so if you are thinking of vandalizing an entry out of boredom or a desire to see your name in print, why not channel that energy into posting something productive? --Regulas 07:57, 6 June 2007

Excellent comment Regulas. From your entry above, it appears you could make a significant contribution to this article and I encourage you to do so. Crocoite Talk 10:24, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

previously reverted edits

I was curious: I am a Canadian, and so I thought it might be interesting to read this article. I came across a small problem, being from Montreal. I noticed that the article accuses Canada of having lower standards of education indirectly, quoting McGill's grading scheme - which happens to be unusual in Canada. Most of the schools in Canada follow a grading system identical to or similar to the U.S. system (which is not cited), and McGill also does not pass a student with a D, which makes the effective failing grade 54%, which is minimally different from the U.S.'s 59%. I recommend that this particular passage be removed, as it is highly misleading. May I remove it? I do not want to be accused of vandalism or of arbitrarily removing information. Nihiltres 23:33, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

  • LOL...I don't think you actually have to walk on eggs so gingerly, Nihiltres! Please make common sense edits, and cite your material properly, and there won't be a problem. If there is, please let me know. I do suggest, coming from a family that has many teachers, that 54% verses 59% isn't what any teacher would call minimal. In that 5% of difference are how many students? I am merely trying to point out things that people take for granted saying on WP, won't skate here, in our Conservative world. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 00:57, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
  • I'm sure that there's good reason to make the change, just I'm not sure how to find a source for what would seem to be a norm - people do not usually write news reports saying that "life is normal." I'll try to find a couple of sources for the correction, perhaps using the grading schemes of other schools. As for walking on eggs, I plan to do that while here - offending Conservapedians is the last thing that I want, as it reinforces negative feelings where cooperation and friendliness might otherwise reign. I think that if Conservapedians want a problem on Wikipedia fixed, commenting on the talk page with a courteous explanation of the problem might prove effective at solving many problems of bias or correcting factual inaccuracies. The Golden Rule is what I have in mind here. :) Nihiltres 11:07, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

There actually is no "Canadian grading system" because, as the article points out, education is a provincial responsibility. In fact it varies among institutions within individual provinces. Generally speaking, institutions with lower grades required to pass have higher marking standards. An example is that passing grades at community colleges are usually higher than at universities. --The Four Deuces 17:02, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

Sea to sea not from the bible

In none of the references of this article is it claimed the origin of the expression "sea to sea" is grounded in the bible, thus I have modified this line.


"The country's motto is "A Mari Usque Ad Mare", or "From Sea to Sea" (taken from Psalm 72:8 - "He shall have dominion from sea to sea.") [1]"

to be

"The country's motto is "A Mari Usque Ad Mare"

Qc 16:57, 9 March 2008 (EDT)


Actually, it is, Canada's Motto is based on "From Sea to Sea" from Psalm 72:8. (See http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/arm2_e.cfm) There was a Private Member's Bill in 2006 (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/03/10/northern-motto060310.html) to change it to "From Sea to Sea to Sea" (That is the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic Ocean's that proposed a change, but it did not pan out, like most Private Member's bills.

I would suggest we change it back, but I'll add the reference from the Canadian Heritage Website. --Thornhiller 19:38, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

Canada's Economy

Why isn't there any mention of its nominal gdp ? it's close to 1.5 trillion dollars, between Spain and Brazil. ppp gdp is good to use when you're comparing the economies of poor countries to rich countries but it's not realistic. What makes more sense, Iran's economy is the same size as Australia's, or it's much smaller than Denmark's ?

culture and education

The section on education grade scales is incorrect, it is up to individual schools, and universites to decide their own grade scales. Also, how is stating Canada doesn't do well in the summer olympics relevant to our culture?

Canadian Healthcare

Is this meant to be a joke? I'm not sure exactly where you're getting these figures for wait times, but as a former administrative employee in a Montreal hospital, I can most assuredly say that the figures are not in the least bit accurate. Non critical surgeries do have wait times, but they are substantially less than the "four to eight months" this article claims. Critical life threatening surgeries are seen to immediately.

Non surgical care (which is not mentioned in this article yet of great importance) is also leaps and bounds above established private services. My grandmother, who is currently 98 years of age, has broken her hip twice in the past five years and received an outstanding level of care from hospitals (free service), care homes (also free), physiotherapists (once more, free) and social caretakers who go to her house (you guessed it, free)both times.

In addition, the cost and availability of pharmaceutical products is not discussed. Medicines essential to life are freely distributed at hospitals, prescription medications are available at pharmacies for a nominal service charge (which is rarely far above 20$ in my experience), whereas over the counter drugs are readily available at prices equal to other First World nations.

I would ask that this article be improved and the facts straightened out, because this sounds very much like a broken Ronald Regan recording. MrCrawford 14:27, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

If you have good sources for what you stated, you are welcome to make improvements. Karajou 14:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

style points

I used The Canadian Style, item 2.16 for the plural of "lieutenant governor" Canuck 23:49, 1 November 2008 (EDT)

In the spirit of the main page...

Should we add a section on "Canadians and uncharitableness"? ;)--DReynolds 10:17, 14 January 2009 (EST)

First Paragraph

Shouldn't the first sentence just say that Canada is a country and maybe pinpoint it geographically rather than compare it to USA? I'm going to do a rewrite if no one objects. --PaulLaroque 00:51, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Check our logo. I object to all of your edits so far, most of which are LIEberal carping. BHarlan 00:53, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

I signed up specifically to complement the author(s) of this article. Conservapedia takes a lot of crap from a lot of people, but this particular article is surprisingly accurate and non-biased. Again, kudos.Bulshoy 16:43, 17 June 2009 (EDT)


Canada-US Relations Page?

Canada and the United States have a long and complex relationship. Perhaps an article detailing the history of this relationship can be created? I'll happily write a draft if the subject matter has not already been dealt with in another article (I couldn't find one).Bulshoy 16:47, 17 June 2009 (EDT)

very good idea. get one started and I will add to it. RJJensen 17:18, 17 June 2009 (EDT)

crime

taking indicators where Canada is worse than USA and ignoring those where it is better is an unfortunate technique that tends to hurt the conservative cause. Canada of course has a conservative government. RJJensen 21:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT)

If you don't to educate readers, I guess "Canada has atypical Western culture crimes; assaults, burglary, drugs, rape and murder." For the record, I support Canada's Conservative government. Also, I support the Catholic Church even though we have a section about scandals.--Jpatt 00:48, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
Canada's murder rate does not get mentioned--it's one-third of USA. Actually the numbers are about REPORTS of crimes. Canada has a very good police system and people do report crimes . Other countries have bad police and people do not report rapes and assaults, which are far more frequent than in Canada. Probably murder is the best indicator because it does get reported in most countries.RJJensen 06:10, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

GDP should be listed; out of date info

why is it like that ? Canada had the 8th largest nominal gdp in the world in 2007 and last year it was over 1.5 trillion dollars. ppp gdp is not an economic measure highly regarded by groups like economist.com, imf, world bank. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Canguy (talk) -- 11:16, 5 August 2009

You signed up, therefore an editor, and the page isn't locked. So the reason you didn't update the information is? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:33, 5 August 2009 (EDT)

Slight error

There was a slight error in the culture section as it read "neighbouring states United States" I simply changed the wording. --Matthew2208 19:29, 17 December 2009 (EST)

Out of Date information

Hello Conservapedia. I noticed that there is an apolitical factual contradiction within the article. I'm not going to cite a reference because the pertinent information necessary for the correction is within the Conervapedia article on Canada. At the end of the section titled "Government,"t says that Stephen Harper's government currently has a minority. As of last year's election, Stephen Harper has a majority. The article does have this correct fact in the section below "Government." Please correct this error. Sincerely, TheZorDude.

DoneJonM 01:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)
Personal tools