Talk:Creation and evolution compared
From Conservapedia
Looks good. This needs, of course, close monitoring. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 08:15, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Table width
Can the table width be set to something static? Like 10% topic, 45% creation, 45% evolution? If it changes topic by topic it might look ugly. I'll look up wiki coding when I get home.-Phoenix 09:03, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- The column widths can be fixed, but as long as it is one table with multiple rows and not multiple tables, it won't change topic by topic. I'd suggest leaving it as it is for now at least, and see how it goes. Philip J. Rayment 09:08, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
Be encyclopedic
I realise that it's early days minutes so far, so I won't change anything just yet, but keep in mind that this should be encyclopedic, not argumentative. You are describing different views, not preaching one view over another. Philip J. Rayment 09:12, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry Phil! Will you help me try to keep it objective? I'm just... not a big evolution fan, I guess? Anyways, I do need your help, but I'll try to keep it objective.-Phoenix 19:45, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
Design revert
Why the revert? I liked the new design...-Phoenix 20:07, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- I don't know why TK reverted it, but what was it particularly that you liked about it? Just the colours, etc., or something else? Philip J. Rayment 21:35, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- TK doesn't know why he reverted it, either...perhaps I can plead "click by distraction"? Sorry. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 07:28, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
Science can be wrong
That's the whole point of science. They're willing to rework their theories when presented with hard evidence. If you've been to the Museum of National History in Washington, D.C., there are many notices on the dinosaur/caveman displays, saying some of the information is now outdated, thanks to new discoveries. If science can be wrong, can creation science? Maestro 09:47, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
Creation science is science. You seem to be making a distiction. Yes it can be wrong, but only where it tries to speculate beyond what the bible specificly says.--Ben Talk 09:53, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
LISTEN TO ME!!
This was intended to be a stinking template/table/info box about what we already have in the article that the CP Panel has frozen! THIS IS NOT A NEW DEBATE ABOUT THE ISSUE! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 21:41, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
