Talk:Encyclopædia Dramatica

From Conservapedia

This nonsense belongs on VFD, if they have that over here at CP. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FillmoreMan (talk)

Delete

If Encyclopedia Dramatica is salted, why not this spelling either. I doubt the article is accurate in how conservatives like to edit it, when its competition, Uncyclopedia is known to be more conservative. --WikiLeon 20:54, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

Both sites are satirical and don't try to offend any group more than another, except furries, which ED hates. ED is also a troll site that has posted porn onto CP, that's why we shouldn't give them a praise page. FillmoreMan 22:45, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

So should the salted page be redirected here instead? --WikiLeon 17:54, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

This page should be deleted, ED is not notable whatsoever. --Richardhead 17:42, 20 December 2007 (EST)

According to one person

According to one person, the site's take on evolution had a greater "depth" than that on competitor site Uncyclopedia. What on earth sort of validity is "according to one person" meant to give? Which one person? And if both ED and Uncyclo are spoof/satirical sites anyway, what does it matter which has the deeper 'take' on evolution? They are scarcely sites to visit for serious presentation of facts/theories/ideologies. Pachyderm 07:12, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

Spelling Errors

Sorry Conservative, I'm sure those errors would have been fixed sooner, only... the article was apparently locked and then forgotten about for a while ^_^". Ah well, it happens... Do you think by now the article could/should be unlocked? Feebasfactor 21:17, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

I don't care either way. My gut tells me that the dramatica people would come here to bully if the article was unlocked. But again, I don't care either way. It seems to me as if the site has noticeably less biting satire when liberal sacred cows like the evolutionary position are written about. Considering such follies as Nebraska man and Flipperpithecus the absence of biting satire in regards to liberal sacred cows was quite telling in regards to the website. Conservative 21:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Oh, I hadn't thought of that... but I see that has happened in the past. Very well, go with your gut Conservative. I don't mind either. And I'm not entirely surprised that the site does seem liberal... Feebasfactor 21:30, 29 April 2008 (EDT)