Talk:Essay: Dawkins is conquered and muzzled by women

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

You wrote "Meanwhile, secular Europe is seeing a flood of religious immigrants". It's true, they are, and this is what they do.[1].--JamieVa (talk) 08:40, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

When told that Red Army soldiers sexually assaulted German refugees, the atheist Joseph Stalin reportedly declared: "We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative." See: Mass rape of German women by the Soviet army
Jesus was crucified due to religious people. And technically speaking, atheism is a religion and historically it is responsible for more untimely deaths than Islam (see: Atheism and mass murder).
I know Muslims have been raping non-Muslim women in Europe, but on the domestic violence front and rape front, irreligion does not have a great record (see: Irreligion and domestic violence and Atheism and rape and Mass rape of German women by the Soviet army). "
A primary reason why irreligious and politically left of center European countries are bringing Muslims into their countries is due to the sub-replacement level of births. Employers need workers (I am guessing this is partly the reason why Germany has so many immigrants). Another is that new immigrants generally vote for leftists. See: Desecularization.
Europe is on the decline and they need to make some changes. I hope to see a resurgence of Christianity in Europe. Conservative (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2016 (EDT)
I had my doubts that Angela Merkel was taking in a lot of immigrants for humanitarian reasons. I think this article confirms my suspicions: There's a very practical reason why Germany is taking in so many refugees. Conservative (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

Anyways, New Atheism is on its last legs. And I think the public mood and the mood within atheism is for there to be less friction between the irreligious and religious and not more. Post-Elevatorgate and Hitchen's death, the atheist movement has a lot of dissension within it and is it more docile in terms of their interaction with the religious (see: Decline of New Atheism).

New Atheism is on its last legs and is almost dead. And with an abrasive pantywaist like Dawkins and a clown like David Silverman (who resides in a religious country) being the leading spokesmen of New Atheism, I don't think things are going to turn around. I call Dawkins an abrasive pantywaist because like many intolerant bullies, he will back down when "punched in the nose" (I am speaking figuratively of course).

It is rather humorous that the supposed alpha male (One of his Dawkins' donors called him "Darwin's Rottweiler") and bully boy Dawkins was trounced and made more docile by feminists. I always suspected that Dawkins had a glass jaw and he would be turned into a whimpering bowl of jelly when faced with enough opposition. William Lane Craig showed Dawkins to be a coward. And given the public statement of Oxford atheist Daniel Came, I think even he thinks Dawkins is a coward (see: Atheism and cowardice).

I think movements that want to change society need both diplomats and firebrands. The atheist movement seems to have lost its most effective firebrands due to death (Christopher Hitchens) or missteps (Dawkins and PZ Myers). A lot of people within the atheist population have soured on Dawkins/Myers. Conservative (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

No Conservative, you were celebrating the influx of religious immigrants into Europe, you did not specify Christian. And when they commit attrocities you turn it around and blame it on atheism; no. These people are/were the followers of the the Ambrahamic god, the same one that you and I believe in. The Madrid train bombings, London Underground, Paris on more than one occassion and now in Belgium people have been slaughtered by people worshipping the One God. Joseph Stalin has been dead over 60 years so don't try pushing the blame onto him.--JamieVa (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2016 (EDT)
PS, If Donald Trump was British and running for Prime Minister, I would vote for him.--JamieVa (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2016 (EDT)
This is User:Conservative. I am editing from a friend's residence.
The article mentions that in France that the fast growing group in France is evangelical Christianity (at the time the article was written). So some of the immigrants are Christians.
Maybe Europeans in general will smarten up and have more Christian immigrants come into their countries and less Muslims. There would be less culture clash and other problems. But I will not hold my breathe.
Next, history indicates that the Europeans may get fed up with the Muslims and expel them. Time will tell. Maybe they will just be more selective as far as the Muslims they let in to their countries in order to lower the odds of disgrunted unemployed Muslims getting radicalized.
Lastly, probably one of the reasons why Dawkins worried about Muslism because they often do not assimilate and most of them are Islamic creationists. Conservatve2 (talk) 21:12, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

In addition, God told Abraham, "Take thy son, thy only son...". Only Isaac was a legitimate line to the Messiah. Ismael was not. "Allah" is a false god.

Atheists also frequently worship a false god. Themselves! See: Atheism and narcissism. Conservatve2 (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2016 (EDT)