Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Science and Evolution

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi there. I realize most of you are just trying to disprove evolution in this article, but you are misrepresenting reference 21 for fact number 14. The reference shows a series of polls about the American public's view on evolution, which you claim states that the majority of Americans do not believe in evolution. However, the most recent poll from 2010 states that 38% of Americans believe in theistic evolution, 16% believe in non-theistic evolution, and only 40% believe in the unscientific young Earth concept. As such, a combined 54% of Americans believe in some form of evolution. Someone should change the article to reflect this point; I would do this myself, but I am new here and I know how you guys hate it when someone disagrees with you. ArthurOliva 14:18, 10 October 2011 (EDT)


On the talk page for the Wikipedia article creation myth it states:"The meaning of "myth", in the context of this article's title, can be found in wikt:myth: A traditional story which embodies a belief regarding some fact or phenomenon of experience, and in which often the forces of nature and of the soul are personified; a sacred narrative regarding a god, a hero, the origin of the world or of a people, etc." if you idiots had just looked at the talk page and not jumped to conclusions then maybe you wouldn't be brainwashing people who visit this site who think that myth implies something not real or true.--Higuys 23:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)