Alright, this article now has the correct title. It is still trash. This is a "sysop-only" contribution I guess. Note there is nothing about the scientific, even speculatively scientific, aspects of the subject. Ga ohoyt 23:25, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but I must agree with the sentiment above. IMHO, whatever the fine quality of the sysops opinion elsewhere, this is just a rant, and continuously expunging comments and locking the rant in won't make the rant of any greater value. Even if what is in the article should be in a proper article as one conservative viewpoint (albeit a very extreme minority conservative viewpoint) other voices need to be heard on this topic. This sort of protect-a-rant will undermine the whole conservapedia project. I recommend this article be handed over to a sysop who is not a christian fundamentalist (I assume that there are some).
- You know this (the first part) for a fact?--Frey 17:52, 17 June 2008 (EDT)