Talk:Militant atheism and the intellectual slothfulness of PZ Myers

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm not sure

Maybe Mariano Grinbank isn't going to like that you've incorporated his essay as the lead in for (yet) another attack article on a prominent, (and yes, over-weight) atheist?
Grinbank's essay brings much data to the fore, convicting Myers with his own petard. The sections following (while factually correct), are randomly stapled onto Grinbank's excellent essay in such a fashion that the reader is left wondering why these obtuse non sequiturs are even on the page, except to vilify PZ Myers' "gravitational challenges".
We can't all be Jack LaLanne. DevonJ 23:47, 28 May 2011 (EDT)


these essays of yours, conservative, all look rather similar. They also follow the same circular patterns. For example:

  1. atheist=dumb
  2. dumb=fat, and also this
  3. fat=dumb
  4. atheists are therefore fat and dumb

I'd love to help you organize your work into a more comprehensive gestalt. Currently, your essays may seem redundant to newcomers. Might I be authorized to begin this endeavor? Also, could I suggest you make some critiques about atheists that aren't fat? There are a few out there. Brad Pitt, for example. Maybe you could make a Brad Pitt v. Chuck Norris essay? I know how much you like Chuck Norris. Pitt's partner, Angelina Jolie, is also an atheist. It would be interesting to see you do a piece on Brangelina.--CamilleT 23:59, 28 May 2011 (EDT)

Does Angelina Jolie smoke? Perhaps you might include her in a atheism and smoking article if she is an atheist who smokes. Don't forget to include John Lennon as well in the article. conservative 15:14, 4 June 2011 (EDT)
By the way, knowing that atheists often do sloppy research and are often desperate to call someone an atheist, you might want to look at this source which relates to your claim that Pitt is supposedly an atheist. conservative 15:18, 4 June 2011 (EDT)