Talk:Naturalistic evolution

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

How does one tell when evolution is guided, and when it is unguided? Teresita 19:37, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

It is untestable and unanswerable, unless you ask Phil.--PalMDtalk 19:38, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

I know of guided evolution in a non-theistic way. We do it each time we take an anti-biotic. We are eliminating all of the non-resistant bacteria (at least most of them) so that the resistant bacteria now have more room to grow and better fitness (ability to get genes into the future). This is also known as artificial evolution. Another example could be choosing the fattest pigs or strongest horses from a group. But like above if we aren't guiding evolution then we don't know if it is being guided.--Snotbowst 23:37, 1 March 2008 (EST)

That's natural or artificial selection, not evolution. Philip J. Rayment 00:05, 2 March 2008 (EST)

...that's it?

This is the article that got deleted from Wikipedia? Please tell me that was just a figure of speech or something. If that's really the entire thing, I think I know why it got vaped - and no, it's not "because of The Liberals". --Sid 3050 19:41, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--PalMDtalk 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Mh, my thoughts exactly... --Sid 3050 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Great minds...must have been created alike.--PalMDtalk 19:45, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

I didn't mean I was copying it; I'm starting fresh, if you don't mind. --Ed Poor 19:48, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
With all due respect, Ed, this article relies on polls and not some of the evidence of Intelligent Design, such as the little ball bearings in bacterial flagellum, etc. So it's like doing an article on whether or not George Washington chopped down the cherry tree, and citing polls that 70% of Americans believe that he did. Teresita 20:16, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Personal tools