Talk:Peter Pace

From Conservapedia

oh gosh

The article is about General Pace's comment on a single issue. The man has lived since 1945, he has certainly worked and sweated and studied to arrive at his position. He has competed and proven his high moral fiber, his trustworthiness and ability to make decisions, to arrive at his position. Must we take a man in a high position, ignore his whole life and all of what he worked for, for 60 years and IGNORE it, so that we can present one, single comment he once made that was controversial? This is cheap news, this is slapping at the man, this is a very poor presentation of a trusted man's life and work. Terryeo 16:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

I've put a little effort into correcting that mistake, but you could write volumes about such a man. Hopefully there are some Pentagon watchers around here to help further expand this article.--All Fish Welcome 03:54, 15 April 2007 (EDT)