Talk:Piltdown Man
From Conservapedia
The article presently needs to back up its claims with citations/links
The article presently needs to back up its claims with citations/links in numerous places which I noted. Conservative 16:34, 12 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
- The "citation needed" in the paragraph "Evidences of a greater complicity..." is unnecessary since an actual example is given in the next paragraph: "For instance, in 1922..." Dr. Richard Paley 14:43, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
A citation is definately needed for this line "The Piltdown Man was publicized as the "Missing Link" between man and ape-like species, which eluded (and still eludes) promoters of evolution." because there are fossils that link homo sapiens and the great apes, just like there are transitional fossils between homo habilis and neaderthals. As well, "Like similar artifacts purporting to prove evolution today, there was no independent or public scrutiny of the actual materials" this is quite the bold statement to make since many scientists examine the same fossils for their research ie "lucy", this absolutely needs a citation (credible one) if it is to have any merit. -shoe
Category
Since the article is categorized under "Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation", there's no need to also have it categorized under "Hoaxes". The first is a subset of the other. Thanks Learn together 16:46, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
