Talk:Pokemon

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In Mexico we call them El Chupacabra!

-Jesús Fernandez

Contents

Should I delete this

Should I delete the article or should I see if I can make it a factual article about the show, video game & card game and their popularity?NSmyth00:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

I think it should be kept. There is already a precedent for articles about games in Dungeons and Dragons. And also I think for a while there was a bit of a fundyfuss about Pokemon being satanic or something which might be of interest to Conservapedia readers. Sulgran 01:00, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, I think that someone should at least turn it into a viable article instead of this stupidity. I'm probably going to blank this in a second until I can find enough info about pokemon to make it into a good(or at least an "ok")article.NSmyth 01:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

this needs that fancy thing above the e but i dont know how to do it. Darth Vacatour

you mean, an accent mark? Not really necessary in my opinion. --SpenserL 17:59, 11 June 2011 (EDT)n a

If you want a acute accent, or if you know french an accent aigu, the common command code for é is ALT + 0233 and it should be included since that is how they stylized it to show that it should be pronounced po-kay-mon --Harrymd 17:58, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Israel

In Israel, Pikachu is called Gohld. Its evolved from, Raichu, is Stein in Hebrew.

List of Pokemon

Would it be logical to have some kind of article about all of the Pokemon? JY23 15:46, 23 February 2009 (EST)

It's probably not necessary. There are dedicated wikis that contain nothing but information about the franchise, edited by rabid fans, and it's not an area where bias is likely to be a major issue, so a simple external link to one of them is probably sufficient. I've expanded the article considerably, but writing an article that covers every Pokemon species is probably just duplicating work that's been done incredibly extensively elsewhere. DaveB7 13:41, 3 July 2009 (EDT)

Criticism?

I can provide all the Pokemon information Conservapedia will ever need and much, much more. However, I cannot improve the criticism section of the page, which includes a paltry one sentence that serves as a topic sentence, and needs to be better developed. As a Pokemon player myself, I can't really write a paragraph or more on reasons to oppose Pokemon, religious (promoting satanism and occultism is accused of Pokemon in the article) or otherwise (violence). Though I can provide arguments against all three of these and will do so if that is preferred. --SpenserL 17:59, 11 June 2011 (EDT)

Personal tools