Talk:Pro-life

From Conservapedia

Maybe it should be noted that some so-called "pro-lifers" kill doctors. Very in favour of life, these pro-lifers.

---

== Could someone please explain why the reason for the term "pro-life" is "liberal bias"? Especially when said reason (life begins at conception) is surely in accordiace with Conservapedia thinking? G7mzh 11:39, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

The claim that the Democratic party wishes to have no legal restrictions placed on abortion is just plain wrong. Alloco1 18:17, 30 September 2007 (EDT)

No mention of abortion clinic bombings/car-into-smashings? Barikada 23:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)

"Pro-Abortion"? Come on now, please. That's just offensive. Most Liberals are as "pro-abortion" as most Conservatives are "pro-crusading". Can the statement regarding that please be revised? Thinking that Liberals enjoy killing babies is disgustingly ignorant. VonShroom 16:49, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Then what are these people doing? Are they removing mere lumps of flesh? We say they are killing babies, which is exactly the case, and the "pro-abortion" crowd is working tooth and nail to defend that very thing. THAT is the offensive part. Karajou 17:17, 3 March 2008 (EST)

I'm sorry, but I prefer to consider myself and my peers as "pro-choice", because it sums up my beliefs. I do not enjoy killing babies, I simply agree with a woman's right to chose. Chosing to have an abortion or not could be the most difficult decision a human being could possibly make, and under most circumstances, I do not agree with it. But I think that the foster care system is broken, and that the child would not be given a proper, fair, or quality chance at life. I don't think that people sitting in a large room in Washington have a right to tell a woman what to do regarding the most important part of her life.

Most (and I mean nearly all) people who are not "pro-life" are "pro-choice". They do not like abortions, but believe that it is not their place to make the decision. I just do not think that the statement about "pro-abortion" vs. "pro-choice" is appropriate.

The point is, when that certain someone who is pro-choice excercises that choice, a dead baby is the result each and every time. The baby has no choice, no right to choose, no right to live at all. Karajou 23:17, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Of course, liberals dispute that the life of the fetus begins at conception. This seems to be an intransigent point on both sides, as for one side it's religious, and for the other, it's scientific. I respect both positions (I myself am pro-choice) and I can't say that characterizing one's opposition pejoratively is a civil debate tactic.-PhoenixWright 23:24, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Ok, so we disagree, I understand. I would just like to know if it would be ok to reword the section regarding the "pro-abortion" statement. I find it offensive and not an appropriate way to prove your point.VonShroom 13:57, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Remove statement?

Can the following statement be removed?

"Due to rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, the United States allows abortions at virtually any time in pregnancy. Many state governments even pay for abortions using taxpayer dollars."

It would be relevant to the abortion article, but I don't see the relation to "pro-life". HelpJazz 20:51, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Edit war

Can we have some explanations about the edit war? I agree with the last edit, which was reverted (see above). As for what the SC cases actually said, why don't we find a reference either way instead of just reverting each other. HelpJazz 17:48, 18 February 2008 (EST)