There are many quotes included in this article which to any right-minded individual would see as being obviously taken out of context. Such blatant, willful, obfuscation would undermine the public's trust in this institution (i.e. Conservapedia), and included in the article header is information largely irrelevant to the individual Sam Harris. This is the large quote which is not only broadly irrelevant to the man but also is completely irrelevant to the book it claims to criticise. I feel that the creation of a 'public reception and criticism' section in the article whilst leaving the header to relevant information would be an improvement, and the elision of this quote altogether. There is much better conservative criticism of Sam Harris to be found quite easily, rather than someone 'quipping' something about evolution in response to a philosophy book. Please take these into consideration - Torysaurus Rex.