The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. AliceBG 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
- I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. Philip J. Rayment 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
- After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. Philip J. Rayment 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST)
Cut from article:
- Sexual addiction has always happened. On particularly harmful form is married couples put pressure on their spouse to have very much more sex than the partner wants. This can in the worst cases lead to Marital rape and divorce. One should in no way encourage addiction to Internet porn. Despite this Internet porn addiction is the lesser evil compared to some other behaviours.
- Once sex of any kind becomes uncontrollable the person involved does not exercise Free will.
BenjaminS can attempt to justify his action here. Bugler 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST)
- No need. I trust his judgment. If you have any ideas for adding to the page, please record them here. --Ed Poor Talk 13:52, 8 December 2008 (EST)
- This is the passage censored, and I stand by every word:
I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'.Bugler 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)
My objection to your passage (as I mentioned when I removed it) is that it is an unscourced opinion. While I partially agree with your passage, it still needs to be sourced. Also, unless you find a very scientific study which comes to the above conclusion, make sure you state it as an opinion. I protected the page because you replaced the passage without so much as addressing my concerns. --Ben Talk 14:17, 8 December 2008 (EST)