Talk:The Hobbit
From Conservapedia
Prequel/Sequel
Note that "The Hobbit" is not a prequel to "The Lord of the Rings". The Hobbit was written in 1937, and LOTR was written from 1939 through 1949. In order to be a prequel, The Hobbit would have had to be written after LOTR. Brewer13210 18:54, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
I think that one can't say that Lord of the Rings is a "sequel" to the hobbit. The Lord of the Rings is much thicker in style, writing and information. --User:Additioner 14:40, 25 April 2007
- I think the publisher described it as an "enchanting prelude". --Ed Poor Talk 12:26, 26 November 2008 (EST)
Book Cover
I've tried to add the Cover as an Image, but it looks huge and I don't know how to right align it - any help--Commandment9 19:16, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Just add the code |thumb to the image tag. --Ed Poor 19:17, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks I 'll try to remember that if I add images again. What you have now is what In was aiming for.
Revert explanation
Khazad is the name of dwarves in their own language. Please check appendices. EternalCritic 11:59, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- (this is said with love and jest, as i can do the same facts/languages play with star trek, but...) YOU PEOPLE ARE WAY TOO GEEKY to know that fact. :D--JeanJacques 12:02, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- Tolkien was my childhood. EternalCritic 12:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- Languages are my passion. I've been told to read Tolkien and works about his languages, as he was one of the first & best linguists... I think i want do follow linguistics in graduate study, so I'm more than sure I'll get to share your love of him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JeanJacques (talk)
- Tolkien was a Philologist, and language truly was his passion, both in understanding and making up.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by EternalCritic (talk)
- Languages are my passion. I've been told to read Tolkien and works about his languages, as he was one of the first & best linguists... I think i want do follow linguistics in graduate study, so I'm more than sure I'll get to share your love of him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JeanJacques (talk)
- Usage explanation: Well, I often use the alternate/true names, which exist as redirects, to link to the articles. One reason is that you don't have to type the whole "X (Middle-earth)": Like the Khazâd example above, or "Quendi" for "Elves (Middle-earth)". Its just faster and more elegant. And they are valid redirects, as opposed to misspelled ones. ~ Tolkiendil 15:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- Tolkien was my childhood. EternalCritic 12:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)
Keep it accessible to junior high and high school kids. You can work in the "real" words, but don't make it so kids can't understand the articles. --Ed Poor Talk 12:28, 26 November 2008 (EST)
