From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
! Part of this article was copied from Citizendium and Wikipedia but the copied text was originally written by me, RJJensen (under the name Richard Jensen and rjensen) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. Conservlogo.png
RJJensen 01:01, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

Impressive work. I wanted to add Uighur's at Gitmo. I was wondering if you prefer that information under 'Current tensions in China' or its own section? --jpatt 01:45, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

thanks  :) I suggest a new section for Gitmo. RJJensen 01:55, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

Edited 12/11/2009

My edit is not intended to remove information, rather to update outdated speculation and to add good sources (including the court document) to an unsourced section. If there are problems with this edit, please improve rather than reverting. JDWpianist 11:24, 11 December 2009 (EST)

good job! RJJensen 11:48, 11 December 2009 (EST)
I take issue with this unsourced statement "After the Bush administration had conceded that the Uighurs could not be considered enemy combatants" --Jpatt 12:19, 11 December 2009 (EST)
The activist judge believed the US Govt conceded, not the Bush admin.--Jpatt 12:22, 11 December 2009 (EST)
Actually, the source I added (the judge's statement) makes that clear. On September 30th, the Bush administration conceded that the Uighurs were not enemy combatants. Perhaps I should cite that sentence as well.JDWpianist 13:05, 11 December 2009 (EST)
It's clear that "I believe the Government has conceded". That is an interpretation from an activist judge.--Jpatt 13:16, 11 December 2009 (EST)
Read page 10. Mr. O'Quinn, representing the US government, says the same thing. I added the page number to the citation. JDWpianist 14:48, 11 December 2009 (EST)

Uighur or Uyghur

Just for kicks, I looked up "uighur" on Wikipedia, and it was redirected to "Uyghur". Which is the correct spelling? --Dfrischknecht 18:32, 8 September 2010 (EDT)