From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search


From the section History to Religion in Vancouver is taken from the Wikipedia's "Vancouver" section Demographics and the 2nd paragraph of the article. Is it okay to leave it like this?
The religion data is out-dated. There are Census results for 2006. ~ JonG ~ 15:41, 23 December 2011 (EST)

JonM suggests that the content on Wikipedia was copied from "the website of vancouver" but it's not even a month since this was added and the link to the Vancouver website doesn't seem to work and I can't find the content anywhere on the website. Even if this was on the Vancouver website, what would be the copyright situation there? It doesn't look like it's in the public domain. Adambro 15:16, 15 January 2012 (EST)
It's a civic website, I think it's fine. If not, revert me.JonM 15:26, 15 January 2012 (EST)
Well I wasn't sure exactly since I couldn't find the precise source to be sure about the copyright situation. Adambro 15:28, 15 January 2012 (EST)
K, revert me. I'll write up something to replace it when I have the time... :)JonM 15:47, 15 January 2012 (EST)
Since no on seems to have gotten to it, i suppose its good, plagiarizing and all?SusanP 23:23, 9 February 2012 (EST)