Talk:Wikipedia copyright

From Conservapedia

Derivative works

"any derivative work must be licensed under the same conditions "

Conservapedia:Copyright doesn't really mention derivative works right now. But is the above implying that derivative works of Conservapedia can be licensed under different conditions than Conservapedia:Copyright? That anyone can get rid of the "This license is revocable only in very rare instances of self-defense" clause just by creating a derivative work (even if it's a totally trivial change, such as a semicolon to a comma)? That doesn't seem like that's what's intended.

Or is there some fourth alternative to "license however you want" (public domain, BSD licenses), "license the same way" (copyleft licenses), and standard U.S. copyright (derivative works are mostly prohibited)? --Interiot 15:56, 9 July 2008 (EDT)