User:Aziraphale/categories/archive1

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Yes, it's been re-org'ed again. Conversations have moved to the discussion page, this page is just the lists I'm keeping. TK, feel free still to mark up the lists as appropriate.

Contents

Counts

To anybody looking in: I don't try to claim I did all of these, I just like keeping track of the overall progress...

Also, if you're watching - I do these alphabetically, but every 100 or so I jump to a new spot, just to mix it up and avoid getting in a rut. After you categorize 20 "Johns" you want to see the letter "D", ya know?

begin Monday: 3000+
end Monday: 2700 -- ~300
begin Tuesday: 2643
end Tuesday: 2369 -- 274
begin Wednesday: 2340
end Wednesday: 2165 -- 175
begin Thursday: 2099
end Thursday (tentative): 1654 -- 445
begin Friday: 1648
end Friday: 1575 -- 73 (laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame)
begin Monday: 1500 on the nose
end Monday: 992 -- 508

992? Yer #*@) right, 992!

Tuesday: sleepy... soooo sleeeeepyyy....

begin Wednesday: 1006
end Wednesday: 932 -- 74 another slow day, sorry
begin Monday: 750 (finger finally healed up, yay! to those who worked on it in the meantime :))
end Monday: 642 -- 108 Slowing down, but we'll get there
begin Tuesday: 629
end Tuesday: 501 -- 128
begin Wednesday: 438 and whoever is doing these besides me, THANK YOU. :D
end Wednesday: 38 -- 400

good job everyone!

Articles in serious need of help

Majority leader
Majority whip
John The Revelator

The Zombie Jesus Memorial Hall of Deleted Articles to be Re-Directed

Reminder: please mark but do not delete (from this list) articles that have been dealt with. No official reason, it just makes me happy... :D

  • Everything here is already going to a deleted page....--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 08:47, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Seems somebody with sysop privileges has been working on these - they were showing up as uncategorized pages when I found them (which is I why I needed you to fix them) but they're gone now. Thanks to whoever did it. :D Aziraphale 14:09, 30 July 2007 (EDT) <-back in black...

[[deletedpage]] hehehehehe seriously, though, it does.
[[Evolution of Homo]]
The Evolution of the Human Race
The Evolutionary History of Homo sapiens
The Evolutionary History of Man
[[Evolution of Modern Man]]
[[Excrement]]
Five Million Years of Human Evolution
Five Million Years of Human Evolutionary History
Frank zappa - this is another "protected" article that isn't actually protected
From Ape to Man 5 million years of Human Evolution
"g-o-a-t-s-e" (it's a filtered word)
Great Southern Conversion
Humanity's Evolutionary History
Hypocrite
Lafayette ron hubbard
orgasm
Plio-Pleistocene Human Evolution
porn
premature ejaculation
preznit
raptor jesus
ridiculous
Right Wing Bias
Sysop Talk
thetan
useless
[[vaginal sex]]
vulva
Waukesha south
The Yankee Commentary
[[Zombie jesus]]

The USS Cyclops Memorial Hall of Protected Articles That Need Categorizing

edit:this list now accurate (as in, these all need dealing with) as of August 1st, noon pacific time

I'll list category suggestions, but feel free to put them where you like...

Reminder: please mark but do not delete (from this list) articles that have been dealt with. No official reason, it just makes me happy... :D

Flat Earth -> maybe "geology" or "science?" feedback welcome Created: Category:Theories
Flight 19 -> "United States Navy," "aviation" Karajou is 100% responsible for writing and locking the article, you might want to talk to him about it Navy and Theories
Great Southern Conversion -> I have no idea what this is
Jonathan Wells -> "intelligent design theorists"
Kataeb Social Democratic Party -> "political organizations" POLITICAL PARTIES
L. Ron Hubbard -> "authors"
Laura Nyro -> "musicians"
Liberty Godparent Foundation -> "Christian Organizations"
Lincoln's Cooper Union Speech -> "Abraham Lincoln"
Main Page -> "Consevapedia administration"
Main Page/Previous Conservapedia Breaking News/Archives -> "Conservapedia administration"
Main Page/Previous Conservapedia Breaking News/Archives/June 2007 -> "Conservapedia administration"
Mammon -> "religion"
Marine Sulphur Queen -> "United States law"
Mary Cheney -> "biographies" or, frankly, "articles proposed for deletion"
morality -> meh, you pick
Official Conservapedia Usernames -> "conservapedia administration" Administration should have been upper case...
Origin of life -> "evolution", "creationism"
ridiculous
StudyConservapedia -> "homeschool curriculum"

The George Cloon[e]y Memorial Colonnade of Misspelled Article Titles

[[firefighting]] -> "fire fighting" Page "Firefighting" moved to "Fire Fighting". --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 15:53, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
George Cloony -> "George Clooney"
[[Penny Aracade]] -> "Penny Arcade"
[[Saurav ganguly]] -> "Saurav Ganguly"
Richard mellon scaife -> "Richard Mellon Scaife"
Stockwell day -> "Stockwell Day"
Stringfellow hawke -> "Stringfellow Hawke"

Self-Amusements I Need to Go Fix Later

defenestration
"category:cats"



The Joseph McCarthy Memorial Hall to Articles That Are Their Own Special Problems

So, Joseph McCarthy is not locked, but when I categorize it and then save, it fails to save my change. I've tried in both Firefox and IE7. Please try yourself. He just needs to be "category:politician" or "US Senators" (although in my opinion that category should be for current senators. Still that's a conversation for another time).


  • It is so large and bloated, it took me four attempts to slap a category on it. Do you know how to make a second page for it? Transclusion? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 16:34, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
Well first -thanks. :) I guess if I had kept trying it would have eventually saved. C'est la vie...
As for the second page, I believe you would, for example, re-name the first page "JM (biography)" and then name another page "JM senate career" and then copy over his senate stuff to that page, and link to it. Those would still probably be large pages, so another page called "retrospective views" could be created, etc...
That said, I'm no McCarthy expert so the article editors might be better sources of suggestions. But basically, I think that's how it would work. Aziraphale 16:55, 23 July 2007 (EDT) <-am I now, or have I ever been, a member of New Kids on the Block? ANSWER THE QUESTION!


Note to whoever else watches this page...

Somebody else needs to help clean up Special:Uncategorizedpages or it will get out of hand eventually. Once I've asked people to categorize their own pages nicely, I get less willing to clean up after them. Aziraphale 12:15, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

  • Well it seems as if you have withdrawn from the project, so I will need to find someone else to help with all of this now. I was in hopes of cooperation and help with the categories, needed pages, etc. If you no longer have the time, or desire to help with this, do you have any suggestions as to others who have the technical wiki knowledge to do it? --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 01:51, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
I've withdrawn? Check my history TK, I was categorizing *today*. There aren't as many articles to be categorized. I've also contributed to the conversations in your sandbox. Not HUGELY, but I've been keeping up. Yeah, I've been lazy about doing the US -> United States. Assuming the pace around here continues to be what it has been, I imagine they'll be there this weekend or next week when I get around to them. ;) I'm sorry if you feel my level of commitment is unacceptable. You're right, I'm not terribly "committed." THIS IS MY HOBBY. That said, when the mood strikes me I'm happy to contribute my labors to the things I want to do.
If you want to take my irritation with Ed Poor telling me, essentially, that his big britches don't warrant doing the little things that are being asked of all editors (and I'd like to point out that ASchlafly considered it a faux pas when he forgot to categorize an article) for a withdrawal, that's your business. Barring a banning, I'll continue to contribute at my own pace. Sometimes it's a trickle, sometimes it isn't.
Lastly, I've got no relationship with any other editors, here or on any other related site - to give you an idea, YOU have received almost all the non-editing communication I've done here, and you know that ain't been much. So no, I can't recommend anyone else.
okay, I lied, NOW lastly - if I seem particularly irritated, my mother pulls this same crap. I make a reasonable statement that sets (in my opinion, at least) a reasonable limit on my personal boundaries, and I get the melodrama. "ooOOOoooohhhh, you're with-DRAAAAAWWWwwwwwin'. *back of hand to forehead* I think ah have th' VAY-puhs!" Aziraphale 02:59, 11 August 2007 (EDT) <-frankly my dear...
Personal tools