User:Conservative

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

I have been an Administrator/SYSOP on Conservapedia since February of 2007.

I came to Conservapedia to help bury liberalism on the internet, not to praise it. :)

To be at Conservapedia, or not to be at Conservapedia: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous liberal bloggers, or to post words against a sea of errant liberal ideologies, and by opposing help end them?  :)

Why do the atheists rage, and the evolutionists imagine a vain thing?

Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.


Click this link if you want to hear a nice song and video


Coming Attraction

The history of Conservapedia articles that have become more popular among conservatives and more well known by liberals strongly suggest that Conservapedia evolution article will likely keep climbing up the search engine rankings. The Conservapedia evolution article will likely see a significant uptick in traffic. Given that the evolutionary position is slowly losing support in the United States which is one of the scientific powerhouses of the world, the Conservapedia article gaining more and more exposure certainly is not helpful in regards to evolutionists propagating their evolutionary dogma on the internet.

.


.


.

FUN FACTS ABOUT LIBERALS

According to a peanut butter and jelly granola distributor, American consumers prefer creamy peanut butter to crunchy by a 60% to 40% ratio. Also, American children and women prefer creamy while most men opt for crunchy (for verification/details call 1-866-374-4442). Since many liberal American men get bossed around by their feminist liberal wives, it appears likely many American liberal men may be eating creamy peanut butter even though they prefer crunchy peanut butter deep down. :) These American liberal men are likely afraid to ask their liberal feminist wives if their household can stock crunchy peanut butter in addition to stocking creamy peanut butter!

It also appears as if liberals suffer from arachibutyrophobia more which is the fear of peanut butter getting stuck to your mouth. For the Bible declares, ""The wicked flee when no one is pursuing, but the righteous are bold as a lion."  :)

In addition, it appears as if many liberal atheists have nightmares about peanut butter. :)

Articles I created a significant percentage of content to:

Articles I created:

Evolution - A Fairy Tale For Grownups
Evolution - A Fairy Tale For Grownups
A crack team of liberal intelligentsia in hot pursuit of evidence that will overthrow the Conservapedia evolution, atheism, and homosexuality articles.
A crack team of liberal intelligentsia in hot pursuit of evidence that will overthrow the Conservapedia evolution, atheism, and homosexuality articles.


Evolutionists, have you heard the good news?  The Conservapedia evolution article has certainly been climbing up the search engine rankings!!!
Evolutionists, have you heard the good news? The Conservapedia evolution article has certainly been climbing up the search engine rankings!!!
]


A satire of atheism
A satire of atheism
Adolph Hitler wrote the following evolutionary racist statement in Mein Kampf:  "The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable."[1] Charles Darwin was also a racist.
Adolph Hitler wrote the following evolutionary racist statement in Mein Kampf: "The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable."[1] Charles Darwin was also a racist.
Dr. Josef Mengele's evolutionary thinking was in accordance with social Darwinist theories that Adolph Hitler and a number of German academics found appealing.[2]  Dr. Joseph Mengele studied under the leading proponents the "unworthy life"  branch of evolutionary thought.[3]  Dr. Mengele was one of the most notorious individuals associated with Nazi death camps and the Holocaust.[4]  Mengele obtained a infamous reputation due to his experiments on twins while at Auschwitz-Birkenau.[5]
Dr. Josef Mengele's evolutionary thinking was in accordance with social Darwinist theories that Adolph Hitler and a number of German academics found appealing.[2] Dr. Joseph Mengele studied under the leading proponents the "unworthy life" branch of evolutionary thought.[3] Dr. Mengele was one of the most notorious individuals associated with Nazi death camps and the Holocaust.[4] Mengele obtained a infamous reputation due to his experiments on twins while at Auschwitz-Birkenau.[5]
In 2008, a videotaped interview  which featured the prominent evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins being caught off guard and completely stumped by the question of a creationist became widely available to public.[6] The video which was produced by Creation Ministries International can be seen HERE.  The video is well known and has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times.[7]  A shortened version of the video has been translated into 10 languages.[8]   A DVD entitled From a Frog to Prince was produced which features the aforementioned Dawkins interview.[9]
In 2008, a videotaped interview which featured the prominent evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins being caught off guard and completely stumped by the question of a creationist became widely available to public.[6] The video which was produced by Creation Ministries International can be seen HERE. The video is well known and has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times.[7] A shortened version of the video has been translated into 10 languages.[8] A DVD entitled From a Frog to Prince was produced which features the aforementioned Dawkins interview.[9]
The Conservapedia atheism article which skewers atheism is flying high at Google Cuba for the search atheism.  Ole! Ole! Ole!
The Conservapedia atheism article which skewers atheism is flying high at Google Cuba for the search atheism. Ole! Ole! Ole!
Have you seen the high search engine rankings at Google, Yahoo, and MSN for Conservapedia's atheism article? [10][11][12] The search engine rankings for Conservapedia's atheism article make me want to break out in song! Break out the musical instruments, Conservapedia's atheism article ranks high for all three major search engines!
Have you seen the high search engine rankings at Google, Yahoo, and MSN for Conservapedia's atheism article? [10][11][12] The search engine rankings for Conservapedia's atheism article make me want to break out in song! Break out the musical instruments, Conservapedia's atheism article ranks high for all three major search engines!
Finally, a transitional species? :)
Finally, a transitional species? :)
The evolutionary progagandist organization the National Center for Science Education recently moved their headquarters.  Above is their newly refurbished headquarters the tower of evobabble.
The evolutionary progagandist organization the National Center for Science Education recently moved their headquarters. Above is their newly refurbished headquarters the tower of evobabble.
You don't have to be a big dog to rip open the soft underbelly of atheism! The atheists do it themselves!  Charles Darwin was a closet atheist and Darwin wrote in his private notebooks that he was a materialist, which is a type of atheist.  Darwin is arguably the most famous atheist in all history.  I cite the following regarding Darwin from the Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy:  "In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of Orchids, and upon The Earthworms, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.” "[13]
You don't have to be a big dog to rip open the soft underbelly of atheism! The atheists do it themselves! Charles Darwin was a closet atheist and Darwin wrote in his private notebooks that he was a materialist, which is a type of atheist. Darwin is arguably the most famous atheist in all history. I cite the following regarding Darwin from the Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy: "In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of Orchids, and upon The Earthworms, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.” "[13]
Noted evolutionist Stephen Gould wrote the following regarding Ernst Haeckel's work in a March 2000 issue of Natural History:"Haeckel’s forceful...books appeared in all major languages and surely exerted more influence than the works of any other scientist, including Darwin…in convincing people throughout the world about the validity of evolution... Haeckel had exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions. He also, in some cases — in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent — simply copied the same figure over and over again.…Haeckel’s drawings never fooled expert embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start....[W]e do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"[14] Above is a never before released color enhanced photograph of Darwin admitting under interrogation that Haeckel's fraudulent evolutionary propaganda had more influence in establishing the theory of evolution in its adherents than his own work and the work of his evolutionary colleages.
Noted evolutionist Stephen Gould wrote the following regarding Ernst Haeckel's work in a March 2000 issue of Natural History:"Haeckel’s forceful...books appeared in all major languages and surely exerted more influence than the works of any other scientist, including Darwin…in convincing people throughout the world about the validity of evolution... Haeckel had exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions. He also, in some cases — in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent — simply copied the same figure over and over again.…Haeckel’s drawings never fooled expert embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start....[W]e do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"[14] Above is a never before released color enhanced photograph of Darwin admitting under interrogation that Haeckel's fraudulent evolutionary propaganda had more influence in establishing the theory of evolution in its adherents than his own work and the work of his evolutionary colleages.
Law enforcement officers using bloodhounds have been called out in mass and are still looking for the alleged evolutionist fugitives who purportedly stole the mountains of evidence supporting the theory of evolution which evolutionist often assert actually exists.
Law enforcement officers using bloodhounds have been called out in mass and are still looking for the alleged evolutionist fugitives who purportedly stole the mountains of evidence supporting the theory of evolution which evolutionist often assert actually exists.
Another evolutionist falls tragically to his death attempting to climb "Mount Improbable".  "Mount Improbable" is littered with evolutionist bodies at its base and will never be successfully climbed.  The mountain has been renamed Mount Impossible but the evolutionists continue to pursue their quixotic quest.
Another evolutionist falls tragically to his death attempting to climb "Mount Improbable". "Mount Improbable" is littered with evolutionist bodies at its base and will never be successfully climbed. The mountain has been renamed Mount Impossible but the evolutionists continue to pursue their quixotic quest.
Robert Sloan, who was a director of the paleontology at the University of Minnesota, reluctantly admitted to a Wall Street Journal reporter that the "creationist tend to win" the public debates which focused on the creation vs. evolution controversy.[15]  Leading evolutionists generally no longer debate creation scientists.  Yet, Richard Dawkins is called "Darwin's rottweiler".  Perhaps Mr. Dawkins should be renamed "Darwin's poodle".
Robert Sloan, who was a director of the paleontology at the University of Minnesota, reluctantly admitted to a Wall Street Journal reporter that the "creationist tend to win" the public debates which focused on the creation vs. evolution controversy.[15] Leading evolutionists generally no longer debate creation scientists. Yet, Richard Dawkins is called "Darwin's rottweiler". Perhaps Mr. Dawkins should be renamed "Darwin's poodle".

Free Stress Test

Take a Free Stress Test


SYS
This user is a Conservapedia Sysop.
OP
Personal tools