User:GregG/RSS 5

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:31:56 GMT (edit by Cyclofile)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Netherlands</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:31, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
The Netherlands (Dutch: Nederland) is a country in the European Union in northwestern Europe, north of Belgium and France. It is a part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Koninkrijk der Nederlanden). It is bordered by Belgium and Germany, and has a total population of 16.5 million (2009). Its system of government is constitutional monarchy. The country is often referred to as "Holland", this was originally the name of two densely populated provinces of the country (North-Holland and South-Holland), the cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague all lie in these provinces that have always been the most influential regions in the Netherlands. The official language is Dutch and the people are referred to in English as Dutchmen or collectively as the Dutch.
The Netherlands (Dutch: Nederland) is a country in the European Union in northwestern Europe, north of Belgium and France. It is a part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Koninkrijk der Nederlanden). It is bordered by Belgium and Germany, and has a total population of 16.5 million (2009). Its system of government is constitutional monarchy. The country is often referred to as "Holland", this was originally the name of two densely populated provinces of the country (North-Holland and South-Holland), the cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague all lie in these provinces that have always been the most influential regions in the Netherlands. The official language is Dutch and the people are referred to in English as Dutchmen or collectively as the Dutch.
-
The major ethnic groups in the Netherlands are Dutch 94%, Surinamese 2% and others 2%.
+
The major ethnic groups in the Netherlands are Dutch 85%, Indonesian 2.3%, German 2.3%, Turkish 2.3%, Maroccan 2,1% and Surinamese 2,1%.
==Dike system==
==Dike system==
The term "Netherlands" means "low country," and it is a very low-lying country. About a quarter of the land area, containing more than half of the population, is actually below sea level, and would flood if the sea were not held back by a system of dikes. The Dutch have a saying  that "God created the earth, but the Dutch made Holland".
The term "Netherlands" means "low country," and it is a very low-lying country. About a quarter of the land area, containing more than half of the population, is actually below sea level, and would flood if the sea were not held back by a system of dikes. The Dutch have a saying  that "God created the earth, but the Dutch made Holland".
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:40:07 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: why the difference in mass?

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:40, 26 March 2012
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 113: Line 113:
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:As a point of interest, were those figures measured directly, or was one of them calculated using the equation?--CPalmer 11:35, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Sorry, I have just read the article and my question is answered. Very informative!--CPalmer 11:37, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:40:38 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: removing self-neutralising posts, both by me

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:40, 26 March 2012
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 113: Line 113:
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:45:46 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: why volts?

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:45, 26 March 2012
Line 114: Line 114:
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
+
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
 +
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:45:31 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos: rm reference to talkspace--the encyclopedia article should be able to stand alone

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:45, 26 March 2012
Line 94: Line 94:
==A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos==
==A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos==
-
Here is another example of the use of this formula in physics calculations.  Recently there has been quite a controversy over whether neutrinos were observed traveling at a speed faster than light.  Relativity doesn't allow that, and, since neutrinos have nonzero (but incredibly tiny) mass, they aren't even supposed to travel at the speed of light.  This very issue came up on the Talk:Main_Page#Neutrinos.  The speeds under discussion were calculated by the use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
+
Here is another example of the use of this formula in physics calculations.  Recently there has been quite a controversy over whether neutrinos were observed traveling at a speed faster than light.  Relativity doesn't allow that, and, since neutrinos have nonzero (but incredibly tiny) mass, they aren't even supposed to travel at the speed of light.  The speeds under discussion were calculated by the use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:47:16 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

+additional quote from abstract that clarifies his position

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:47, 26 March 2012
Line 7: Line 7:
For more than a century, the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup> has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "energy" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the lamestream media. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in nuclear power generation and nuclear weapons, and in the study of antimatter.<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS NOVA. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref>
For more than a century, the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup> has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "energy" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the lamestream media. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in nuclear power generation and nuclear weapons, and in the study of antimatter.<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS NOVA. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref>
-
The Theory of Relativity has never been able to derive E=mc<sup>2</sup>, and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref>
+
The Theory of Relativity has never been able to derive E=mc<sup>2</sup>, and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory," even though "it continues to be affirmed experimentally."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref>
At most, radiation has a mass equivalence, which was correctly derived by Henri Poincare in 1904:<ref>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-42-8-540</ref>  
At most, radiation has a mass equivalence, which was correctly derived by Henri Poincare in 1904:<ref>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-42-8-540</ref>  
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:47:02 GMT (edit by LebowaPijeva)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:LebowaPijeva</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Created page with "So which are the legends of Valentine's Day? It isn't really known and is also shrouded in Mystery regarding exactly the way the tradition began. All we realize for sure is which..."

New page

So which are the legends of Valentine's Day? It isn't really known and is also shrouded in Mystery regarding exactly the way the tradition began. All we realize for sure is which it started around 270 AD. It is known that February will be the traditional day to celebrate this holiday. Let's take a peek at the few of the legends that surround a symptom of the sexy day.


The first is the very fact that of Emperor Claudius II. During his rule he thought that a single man would come on top of a better worrier compared to a married man. As a result he declared that marriage was an outlawed event coming from all young single men. This needless to say makes some sense in which a married man would clearly miss his wife when within the field. However, anyone inside field becomes lonely in addition to their minds would always revert time for that special woman whether married or not. Needless to repeat the emperor outlawed marriage. The legend contends that Saint Valentine who was obviously a priest serving through the third century in Rome recognized this injustice and defied the Emperor's decree and continued to marry the young lovers secretly. This became obviously very risky and as an outcome the priest was offer death when he was discovered.

Another story is Valentine may happen to be killed as he was assisting Christian in escaping from Roman prisons. However, this only demonstrates this would have been a good man and explain the day's lovers. While another legend states that he was really a prisoner and sent the first valentine greeting from prison to his young love who was thought to become the daughter of his jailer. The legend claim that before being put to death he sent this woman a greeting which he signed "From your Valentine," an expression which is still used today.

No appear the actual story is; it really is clear this man's appeal was as being a sympathetic, heroic, and, most importantly, romantic individual. During Valentine's Day we hope that the lovers we now have encountered are equally as good as though not superior to Saint Valentine himself.

So what's makes an excellent gift for this day's lovers? Of course flowers and candy really are a nice gesture, and not very sexy. In today's world sexy can and may be expressed differently.

A few ideas that could be attractive to all the lovers could possibly be Sexy Lingerie instead flowers and candy. First coming from all flowers will die and the candy can make our lover fat. Neither seems to be a great option. The Sexy Lingerie on one other hand includes a benefit for both lovers and can last long after Valentine's Day. So we recommend getting on the net and finding some Sexy for that both of you which will last the entire year not just a few days.

Another good idea is to appear in the Adult Sex Toy market and discover something sexy there. Adult Sex Toys are certainly one of the products which are likely to please. It has being hardcore, and could possibly be as simple being a sexy game. However, a multifunction device is yet another item that will last long afterwards Valentine's Day, and stated previously fun to get had by all.

So prepare you to ultimately really enjoy Valentine's Day and Make Sexy Count not for just one day, but for that year upcoming. The notion of sexy lovers should 't be celebrated over a single day; it ought to be relished and celebrated often. So maintain your Values of Saint Valentines near and dear in your heart always, and allow your lover call at your feelings often.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:46:19 GMT (edit by LebowaPijeva)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:LebowaPijeva</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:49:23 GMT (edit by Paul5876)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Paul5876</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:51:16 GMT (edit by Cfortunato)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Cfortunato</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:51:11 GMT (edit by Karajou)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Paul5876</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/index.php?title=User:Paul5876&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:Paul5876 (page does not exist)">Paul5876</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul5876&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Paul5876 (page does not exist)">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/Paul5876" title="Special:Contributions/Paul5876">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) Sockpuppet/Abusing multiple accounts

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:47:16 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

+additional quote from abstract that clarifies his position

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:47, 26 March 2012
Line 7: Line 7:
For more than a century, the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup> has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "energy" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the lamestream media. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in nuclear power generation and nuclear weapons, and in the study of antimatter.<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS NOVA. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref>
For more than a century, the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup> has never yielded anything of value.  Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "energy" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the lamestream media. The equation has been used as a possible explanation for process involved in nuclear power generation and nuclear weapons, and in the study of antimatter.<ref>Tyson, Peter. "The Legacy of E=mc<sup>2</sup>." October 11, 2005. PBS NOVA. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html</ref>
-
The Theory of Relativity has never been able to derive E=mc<sup>2</sup>, and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref>
+
The Theory of Relativity has never been able to derive E=mc<sup>2</sup>, and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory," even though "it continues to be affirmed experimentally."<ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H</ref>
At most, radiation has a mass equivalence, which was correctly derived by Henri Poincare in 1904:<ref>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-42-8-540</ref>  
At most, radiation has a mass equivalence, which was correctly derived by Henri Poincare in 1904:<ref>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-42-8-540</ref>  
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:46:19 GMT (edit by LebowaPijeva)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:LebowaPijeva</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:45:46 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: why volts?

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:45, 26 March 2012
Line 114: Line 114:
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
+
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
 +
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:45:31 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos: rm reference to talkspace--the encyclopedia article should be able to stand alone

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:45, 26 March 2012
Line 94: Line 94:
==A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos==
==A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos==
-
Here is another example of the use of this formula in physics calculations.  Recently there has been quite a controversy over whether neutrinos were observed traveling at a speed faster than light.  Relativity doesn't allow that, and, since neutrinos have nonzero (but incredibly tiny) mass, they aren't even supposed to travel at the speed of light.  This very issue came up on the Talk:Main_Page#Neutrinos.  The speeds under discussion were calculated by the use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
+
Here is another example of the use of this formula in physics calculations.  Recently there has been quite a controversy over whether neutrinos were observed traveling at a speed faster than light.  Relativity doesn't allow that, and, since neutrinos have nonzero (but incredibly tiny) mass, they aren't even supposed to travel at the speed of light.  The speeds under discussion were calculated by the use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:40:38 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: removing self-neutralising posts, both by me

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:40, 26 March 2012
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 113: Line 113:
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
In fact as this is such a general truth of universal applicability,  J. Cockroft could take it for granted that his scientifically literate audience would be able to make this calculation.
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:26, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:52:16 GMT (edit by Cfortunato)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:52, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Thank you==
 +
For making conservatives look like total morons.Cfortunato 11:52, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:54:45 GMT (edit by RomannaNorwood)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:RomannaNorwood</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:54:08 GMT (edit by AugustO)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:54, 26 March 2012
Line 120: Line 120:
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
*Bainbridge measured the mass of <sup>7</sup>Li directly, using mass spectrometry.
 +
*Indeed, three protons and four neutrons weight less than a <sup>7</sup>Li - kernel
 +
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
 +
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:56:57 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: talk, talk, talk needs to cease, please

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:56, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
==Thank you==
 
-
For making conservatives look like total morons.Cfortunato 11:52, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
-
 
-
 
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Line 125: Line 121:
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:00:20 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: thanks!

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:00, 26 March 2012
Line 122: Line 122:
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:56:58 GMT (edit by Karajou)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:RomannaNorwood</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/index.php?title=User:RomannaNorwood&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:RomannaNorwood (page does not exist)">RomannaNorwood</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:RomannaNorwood&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:RomannaNorwood (page does not exist)">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/RomannaNorwood" title="Special:Contributions/RomannaNorwood">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) spam

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:56:57 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: talk, talk, talk needs to cease, please

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:56, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
==Thank you==
 
-
For making conservatives look like total morons.Cfortunato 11:52, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
-
 
-
 
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Line 125: Line 121:
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:55:33 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Cfortunato</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/index.php?title=User:Cfortunato&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:Cfortunato (page does not exist)">Cfortunato</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Cfortunato&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Cfortunato (page does not exist)">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/Cfortunato" title="Special:Contributions/Cfortunato">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of 2 years (account creation disabled) Weak sauce.

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:54:08 GMT (edit by AugustO)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:54, 26 March 2012
Line 120: Line 120:
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
:::One question, though: We have four protons and four neutrons on the left hand side of the equation, and four protons and four neutrons on the right hand side. So why the difference in mass?
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::Also, forgive my ignorance, but why is the 'energy' measured in volts? Volts are not a measure of energy.--CPalmer 11:40, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
*Bainbridge measured the mass of <sup>7</sup>Li directly, using mass spectrometry.
 +
*Indeed, three protons and four neutrons weight less than a <sup>7</sup>Li - kernel
 +
*Energy is measured in this cases in Electron-Volts. One electron volt is the energy of an electron which passed through a potential of 1 Volt.
 +
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:52:16 GMT (edit by Cfortunato)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 15:52, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Thank you==
 +
For making conservatives look like total morons.Cfortunato 11:52, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
==This Article Could Use Sources or Better Explanation==
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Wow. Classic Andy. Unsourced statements supposedly contradicting well-established theories of physics. No real proof other than "the Bible says it's not true," even though this is an extremely uncommon interpretation Genesis. --AndreaM 01:06, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:03:57 GMT (edit by Conservative)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Has the scope of Conservapedia changed?:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:03, 26 March 2012
Line 548: Line 548:
:::Well for a while, I relentlessly pounded the atheism beaches via the main page and it was very popular post New Atheism. :) Shockofgod and his fans certainly liked it. :) I think Christendom is going to be increasingly active on the evolutionism front and I see no reason for not covering it on the main page. With global atheism getting weaker by the day and this trend accelerating, Christendom should certainly capitalize on this matter and evolutionism is the air supply of atheism.  Much of conservatism is driven by religious conservatism after all and this is going to increasingly be the case.[3] Conservative 10:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::Well for a while, I relentlessly pounded the atheism beaches via the main page and it was very popular post New Atheism. :) Shockofgod and his fans certainly liked it. :) I think Christendom is going to be increasingly active on the evolutionism front and I see no reason for not covering it on the main page. With global atheism getting weaker by the day and this trend accelerating, Christendom should certainly capitalize on this matter and evolutionism is the air supply of atheism.  Much of conservatism is driven by religious conservatism after all and this is going to increasingly be the case.[4] Conservative 10:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::: Ok I think I get your point. I also think you should cover the anti-atheistic artciles on the frontpage. Still I miss a bit of normal artcles which are not anti-XXXX, but just neutral and non-political. I understand that as a conservative you want to use the encyclopedia as a measure to bring down atheism, but please don't forget that Conservapedia is also a encyclopedia which is just interesting to read and learn from. Anyway, in the end it's all a matter of taste and mine is just a bit different than the main page we have nowadays. Cyclofile 10:39, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::: Ok I think I get your point. I also think you should cover the anti-atheistic artciles on the frontpage. Still I miss a bit of normal artcles which are not anti-XXXX, but just neutral and non-political. I understand that as a conservative you want to use the encyclopedia as a measure to bring down atheism, but please don't forget that Conservapedia is also a encyclopedia which is just interesting to read and learn from. Anyway, in the end it's all a matter of taste and mine is just a bit different than the main page we have nowadays. Cyclofile 10:39, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
Picture featured in an internet posting entitled The Question evolution! campaign axman cometh[1]
 +
I want to report more on the Question evolution campaign axeman and the person who ordered the 2,000 Question evolution tracts.  Do you think they are the same person or are they different people? :)
 +
 +
Here is some information on the Question evolution campaign axeman:
 +
 +
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[5]
 +
 +
He sounds rather zealous and determined!  Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:05:31 GMT (edit by BlackCat)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&diff=970644&oldid=968355">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:03:57 GMT (edit by Conservative)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Has the scope of Conservapedia changed?:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:03, 26 March 2012
Line 548: Line 548:
:::Well for a while, I relentlessly pounded the atheism beaches via the main page and it was very popular post New Atheism. :) Shockofgod and his fans certainly liked it. :) I think Christendom is going to be increasingly active on the evolutionism front and I see no reason for not covering it on the main page. With global atheism getting weaker by the day and this trend accelerating, Christendom should certainly capitalize on this matter and evolutionism is the air supply of atheism.  Much of conservatism is driven by religious conservatism after all and this is going to increasingly be the case.[6] Conservative 10:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::Well for a while, I relentlessly pounded the atheism beaches via the main page and it was very popular post New Atheism. :) Shockofgod and his fans certainly liked it. :) I think Christendom is going to be increasingly active on the evolutionism front and I see no reason for not covering it on the main page. With global atheism getting weaker by the day and this trend accelerating, Christendom should certainly capitalize on this matter and evolutionism is the air supply of atheism.  Much of conservatism is driven by religious conservatism after all and this is going to increasingly be the case.[7] Conservative 10:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::: Ok I think I get your point. I also think you should cover the anti-atheistic artciles on the frontpage. Still I miss a bit of normal artcles which are not anti-XXXX, but just neutral and non-political. I understand that as a conservative you want to use the encyclopedia as a measure to bring down atheism, but please don't forget that Conservapedia is also a encyclopedia which is just interesting to read and learn from. Anyway, in the end it's all a matter of taste and mine is just a bit different than the main page we have nowadays. Cyclofile 10:39, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::: Ok I think I get your point. I also think you should cover the anti-atheistic artciles on the frontpage. Still I miss a bit of normal artcles which are not anti-XXXX, but just neutral and non-political. I understand that as a conservative you want to use the encyclopedia as a measure to bring down atheism, but please don't forget that Conservapedia is also a encyclopedia which is just interesting to read and learn from. Anyway, in the end it's all a matter of taste and mine is just a bit different than the main page we have nowadays. Cyclofile 10:39, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
Picture featured in an internet posting entitled The Question evolution! campaign axman cometh[2]
 +
I want to report more on the Question evolution campaign axeman and the person who ordered the 2,000 Question evolution tracts.  Do you think they are the same person or are they different people? :)
 +
 +
Here is some information on the Question evolution campaign axeman:
 +
 +
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[8]
 +
 +
He sounds rather zealous and determined!  Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:00:20 GMT (edit by CPalmer)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: thanks!

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:00, 26 March 2012
Line 122: Line 122:
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:07:33 GMT (edit by Ldrysdale27)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Ldrysdale27</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:06:08 GMT (edit by Conservative)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Has the scope of Conservapedia changed?:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:06, 26 March 2012
Line 555: Line 555:
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[9]
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[10]
-
He sounds rather zealous and determined!   Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
+
He sounds very zealous and determined!  :) Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:05:31 GMT (edit by BlackCat)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&diff=970644&oldid=968355">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:13:16 GMT (edit by Aschlafly)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/BlackCat" title="Special:Contributions/BlackCat">BlackCat</a> (<a href="/User_talk:BlackCat" title="User talk:BlackCat">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Aschlafly" title="User:Aschlafly">Aschlafly</a>

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&diff=970647&oldid=970644">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:45 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:12, 26 March 2012
Line 122: Line 122:
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:07:33 GMT (edit by Ldrysdale27)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Ldrysdale27</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:06:08 GMT (edit by Conservative)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Has the scope of Conservapedia changed?:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:06, 26 March 2012
Line 555: Line 555:
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[11]
"A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him."[12]
-
He sounds rather zealous and determined!   Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
+
He sounds very zealous and determined!  :) Conservative 12:03, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:14:00 GMT (edit by Aschlafly)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/BlackCat" title="Special:Contributions/BlackCat">BlackCat</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:BlackCat&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:BlackCat (page does not exist)">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Conservative" title="User:Conservative">Conservative</a>

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:14, 26 March 2012
Line 38: Line 38:
:::::::The agnostic Carl Sagan, who said he obtained his greatest scientific insights smoking marijuana, claimed evolution is a fact. :)  Conservative 11:36, 22 December 2011 (EST)
:::::::The agnostic Carl Sagan, who said he obtained his greatest scientific insights smoking marijuana, claimed evolution is a fact. :)  Conservative 11:36, 22 December 2011 (EST)
Yuck. What a hack. I hate pot-smokers almost as much as I hate agnostics (and I really hate agnostics--what a cop-out). Carl Sagan was certainly wrong--evolution could never be proven, but I think FactCheck47 was referring to what is called microevolution. That is the phenomenon observed with the Galapagos Finches. It will be important for us to distinguish upon this point because a lot of what liberals try to do is prove microevolution (which is fairly easy) and then conclude that all life must come from evolution (ridiculous). But if we get into an argument over whether or not microevolution exists we will lose. Scottma 12:26, 22 December 2011 (EST)
Yuck. What a hack. I hate pot-smokers almost as much as I hate agnostics (and I really hate agnostics--what a cop-out). Carl Sagan was certainly wrong--evolution could never be proven, but I think FactCheck47 was referring to what is called microevolution. That is the phenomenon observed with the Galapagos Finches. It will be important for us to distinguish upon this point because a lot of what liberals try to do is prove microevolution (which is fairly easy) and then conclude that all life must come from evolution (ridiculous). But if we get into an argument over whether or not microevolution exists we will lose. Scottma 12:26, 22 December 2011 (EST)
-
:And why, may I ask, do you hate agnostics ? Do you think God has had a great influence on world history recently ? Did He stop WWII ? Or did Satan start it ? Did He elect anybody to president ? What influence did He have in non-mythological times ? And back to the theory of evolutionsim and creationism : what proof do you have that the world was created by God 5'000 years ago ? As much as I revere and respect the Holy Bible, I think that it should be taken on a non-literal level : thus, when the Bible says Jesus does miracle, we must not take that on the literal sense, but on the sense that faith makes miracle, one of the greatest messages in the history of humanity, propaged by the ecclasiastics I admire most (Martin Luther King, Jr. and Desmond Tutu), and by many other wise men (and women) around the world. This said, I think that the proofs recorded, most notably by the study of skeletons, prove evolutionism to be the right theory, or at least on the right path, while creationism's proofs are a few pieces of paper
 
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:13:16 GMT (edit by Aschlafly)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/BlackCat" title="Special:Contributions/BlackCat">BlackCat</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:BlackCat&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:BlackCat (page does not exist)">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Aschlafly" title="User:Aschlafly">Aschlafly</a>

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&diff=970647&oldid=970644">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:45 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:12, 26 March 2012
Line 122: Line 122:
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
AugustO 11:54, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:20:09 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>German language</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

The four cases: correction

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:20, 26 March 2012
Line 75: Line 75:
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
-
| Der Schweinen*
+
| Den Schweinen*
-
| Den Schweine
+
| Der Schweine
|}
|}
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:14:00 GMT (edit by Aschlafly)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Evolution</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/BlackCat" title="Special:Contributions/BlackCat">BlackCat</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:BlackCat&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:BlackCat (page does not exist)">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Conservative" title="User:Conservative">Conservative</a>

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:14, 26 March 2012
Line 38: Line 38:
:::::::The agnostic Carl Sagan, who said he obtained his greatest scientific insights smoking marijuana, claimed evolution is a fact. :)  Conservative 11:36, 22 December 2011 (EST)
:::::::The agnostic Carl Sagan, who said he obtained his greatest scientific insights smoking marijuana, claimed evolution is a fact. :)  Conservative 11:36, 22 December 2011 (EST)
Yuck. What a hack. I hate pot-smokers almost as much as I hate agnostics (and I really hate agnostics--what a cop-out). Carl Sagan was certainly wrong--evolution could never be proven, but I think FactCheck47 was referring to what is called microevolution. That is the phenomenon observed with the Galapagos Finches. It will be important for us to distinguish upon this point because a lot of what liberals try to do is prove microevolution (which is fairly easy) and then conclude that all life must come from evolution (ridiculous). But if we get into an argument over whether or not microevolution exists we will lose. Scottma 12:26, 22 December 2011 (EST)
Yuck. What a hack. I hate pot-smokers almost as much as I hate agnostics (and I really hate agnostics--what a cop-out). Carl Sagan was certainly wrong--evolution could never be proven, but I think FactCheck47 was referring to what is called microevolution. That is the phenomenon observed with the Galapagos Finches. It will be important for us to distinguish upon this point because a lot of what liberals try to do is prove microevolution (which is fairly easy) and then conclude that all life must come from evolution (ridiculous). But if we get into an argument over whether or not microevolution exists we will lose. Scottma 12:26, 22 December 2011 (EST)
-
:And why, may I ask, do you hate agnostics ? Do you think God has had a great influence on world history recently ? Did He stop WWII ? Or did Satan start it ? Did He elect anybody to president ? What influence did He have in non-mythological times ? And back to the theory of evolutionsim and creationism : what proof do you have that the world was created by God 5'000 years ago ? As much as I revere and respect the Holy Bible, I think that it should be taken on a non-literal level : thus, when the Bible says Jesus does miracle, we must not take that on the literal sense, but on the sense that faith makes miracle, one of the greatest messages in the history of humanity, propaged by the ecclasiastics I admire most (Martin Luther King, Jr. and Desmond Tutu), and by many other wise men (and women) around the world. This said, I think that the proofs recorded, most notably by the study of skeletons, prove evolutionism to be the right theory, or at least on the right path, while creationism's proofs are a few pieces of paper
 
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:20:55 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>German language</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Adjective declension:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:20, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 75: Line 75:
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
-
| Der Schweinen*
+
| Den Schweinen*
-
| Den Schweine
+
| Der Schweine
|}
|}
Line 143: Line 143:
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
-
| Der schlauen Schweinen
+
| Den schlauen Schweinen
-
| Den schlauen Schweine
+
| Der schlauen Schweine
|}
|}
(schwarz = black, gelb = yellow, schlau = clever)
(schwarz = black, gelb = yellow, schlau = clever)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:28:13 GMT (edit by MattH)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Middle-earth</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Removed redundant wording.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:28, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
A map of the north-western part of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age.
A map of the north-western part of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age.
-
Middle-earth is a fictional fantasy world invented by J. R. R. Tolkien. It is the setting of several of the stories written by him, such as The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings. Although Middle-earth is only one continent in Tolkien's world, it is often used for the whole fictional universe and all stories Tolkien invented for it.
+
Middle-earth is a fantasy world invented by J. R. R. Tolkien. It is the setting of several of the stories written by him, such as The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings. Although Middle-earth is only one continent in Tolkien's world, it is often used for the whole fictional universe and all stories Tolkien invented for it.
The world of Middle-earth is supposed to be a long gone mythological time of our earth. The continent Middle-earth corresponds roughly to the Eurasian landmass, "east of the Sea.", although the shape of the lands have changed since then.  
The world of Middle-earth is supposed to be a long gone mythological time of our earth. The continent Middle-earth corresponds roughly to the Eurasian landmass, "east of the Sea.", although the shape of the lands have changed since then.  
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:29:10 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos: add explanation for why classical mechanical equations are inapplicable at high speeds

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:29, 26 March 2012
Line 97: Line 97:
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
 +
However, the classical formula breaks down at speeds close to <math>c</math>, and indeed, as the speed of a massive object approaches <math>c</math>, the object's kinetic energy approaches <math>+\infty</math>.
Several scientists have gone on record stating that the neutrinos, which have mass, travel at precisely the speed of light.  This dispoves the Theory of Relativity and the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
Several scientists have gone on record stating that the neutrinos, which have mass, travel at precisely the speed of light.  This dispoves the Theory of Relativity and the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:28:13 GMT (edit by MattH)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Middle-earth</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Removed redundant wording.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:28, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
A map of the north-western part of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age.
A map of the north-western part of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age.
-
Middle-earth is a fictional fantasy world invented by J. R. R. Tolkien. It is the setting of several of the stories written by him, such as The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings. Although Middle-earth is only one continent in Tolkien's world, it is often used for the whole fictional universe and all stories Tolkien invented for it.
+
Middle-earth is a fantasy world invented by J. R. R. Tolkien. It is the setting of several of the stories written by him, such as The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings. Although Middle-earth is only one continent in Tolkien's world, it is often used for the whole fictional universe and all stories Tolkien invented for it.
The world of Middle-earth is supposed to be a long gone mythological time of our earth. The continent Middle-earth corresponds roughly to the Eurasian landmass, "east of the Sea.", although the shape of the lands have changed since then.  
The world of Middle-earth is supposed to be a long gone mythological time of our earth. The continent Middle-earth corresponds roughly to the Eurasian landmass, "east of the Sea.", although the shape of the lands have changed since then.  
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:20:55 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>German language</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Adjective declension:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:20, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 75: Line 75:
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
| Die Schweine
-
| Der Schweinen*
+
| Den Schweinen*
-
| Den Schweine
+
| Der Schweine
|}
|}
Line 143: Line 143:
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
| Die schlauen Schweine
-
| Der schlauen Schweinen
+
| Den schlauen Schweinen
-
| Den schlauen Schweine
+
| Der schlauen Schweine
|}
|}
(schwarz = black, gelb = yellow, schlau = clever)
(schwarz = black, gelb = yellow, schlau = clever)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:34:39 GMT (edit by MattH)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:MattH</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Created page with "Hello. I'm a big geek who is very into popular culture (movies, comics, books, etc...) but troubled by what seems to be a lack of conservative viewpoints in the world of popular..."

New page

Hello.


I'm a big geek who is very into popular culture (movies, comics, books, etc...) but troubled by what seems to be a lack of conservative viewpoints in the world of popular fiction.

I intend to help people find the conservative meanings in popular works of fiction and literature.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:59 GMT (edit by Bisrael82)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Bisrael82</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:29:10 GMT (edit by GregG)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

A Counterexample: Speed of Extremely Energetic Neutrinos: add explanation for why classical mechanical equations are inapplicable at high speeds

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:29, 26 March 2012
Line 97: Line 97:
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
The mass of a neutrino is about 0.44x10<sup>-36</sup>kilograms.  (Normally all of these things are measured in more convenient units such as Giga-electron-Volts, but that makes implicit use of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  If we don't accept that, we have to do the calculations under classical physics, using SI (meter/kilogram/second) units.)  The neutrinos were accelerated to an energy of about 17GeV, or .27x10<sup>-8</sup>Joules.  Using the classical formula <math>\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2</math>, we get v=110x10<sup>12</sup>meters per second.  This is about 370,000 times the speed of light.
 +
However, the classical formula breaks down at speeds close to <math>c</math>, and indeed, as the speed of a massive object approaches <math>c</math>, the object's kinetic energy approaches <math>+\infty</math>.
Several scientists have gone on record stating that the neutrinos, which have mass, travel at precisely the speed of light.  This dispoves the Theory of Relativity and the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
Several scientists have gone on record stating that the neutrinos, which have mass, travel at precisely the speed of light.  This dispoves the Theory of Relativity and the claim that E=mc<sup>2</sup>.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:35:35 GMT (edit by DavidE)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Theory: fixed equation

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:35, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
a significant share of U.S. energy is nuclear
a significant share of U.S. energy is nuclear
==Theory==
==Theory==
-
The energy released from a nuclear fission device is given by the equation <math>E= MC</math><sup>2</sup>. Spelled out, mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. This equation is the formula for the energy contained in an atom. This energy is released in a nuclear weapon when a speeding neutron collides with the atom, blasting it apart, and releasing the binding energy of the atom. In a nuclear weapon, the atom blasted apart then releases other neutrons which collide with other atoms. This keeps occurring until there are no atoms left to destroy. This is known as a nuclear chain reaction. In a nuclear fission power plant, however, the nuclear core is designed so that a runaway chain reaction cannot occur, by limiting the number of neutrons available to continue the reaction by the use of control rods<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/control.html</ref>.  
+
The energy released from a nuclear fission device is given by the mass–energy equivalence equation <math>E=mc^2</math>. Spelled out, the energy of a physical system equals it mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. This equation is the formula for the energy contained in an atom. This energy is released in a nuclear weapon when a speeding neutron collides with the atom, blasting it apart, and releasing the binding energy of the atom. In a nuclear weapon, the atom blasted apart then releases other neutrons which collide with other atoms. This keeps occurring until there are no atoms left to destroy. This is known as a nuclear chain reaction. In a nuclear fission power plant, however, the nuclear core is designed so that a runaway chain reaction cannot occur, by limiting the number of neutrons available to continue the reaction by the use of control rods<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/control.html</ref>.  
Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is based on putting atoms together, as opposed to breaking them apart in fission, heavier atoms often require less bonding energy than the combined original binding energies of the fusing lighter atoms.
Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is based on putting atoms together, as opposed to breaking them apart in fission, heavier atoms often require less bonding energy than the combined original binding energies of the fusing lighter atoms.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:34:39 GMT (edit by MattH)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:MattH</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Created page with "Hello. I'm a big geek who is very into popular culture (movies, comics, books, etc...) but troubled by what seems to be a lack of conservative viewpoints in the world of popular..."

New page

Hello.


I'm a big geek who is very into popular culture (movies, comics, books, etc...) but troubled by what seems to be a lack of conservative viewpoints in the world of popular fiction.

I intend to help people find the conservative meanings in popular works of fiction and literature.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:59 GMT (edit by Bisrael82)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Bisrael82</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:41:42 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Rick Santorum</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Santorum endorsed RINO-turned-Democrat <a href="/Arlen_Specter" title="Arlen Specter">Arlen Specter</a>.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:41, 26 March 2012
Line 16: Line 16:
In 2006 Bob Casey, Jr., the liberal son of a popular former Pennsylvania governor who had been pro-life, defeated Santorum as part of a Democratic sweep in that election.  Casey subsequently endorsed pro-abortion Barack Obama for president in 2008.
In 2006 Bob Casey, Jr., the liberal son of a popular former Pennsylvania governor who had been pro-life, defeated Santorum as part of a Democratic sweep in that election.  Casey subsequently endorsed pro-abortion Barack Obama for president in 2008.
 +
Santorum endorsed RINO-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter.
==Liberal Obsession with Santorum==
==Liberal Obsession with Santorum==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:35:35 GMT (edit by DavidE)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Theory: fixed equation

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:35, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
a significant share of U.S. energy is nuclear
a significant share of U.S. energy is nuclear
==Theory==
==Theory==
-
The energy released from a nuclear fission device is given by the equation <math>E= MC</math><sup>2</sup>. Spelled out, mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. This equation is the formula for the energy contained in an atom. This energy is released in a nuclear weapon when a speeding neutron collides with the atom, blasting it apart, and releasing the binding energy of the atom. In a nuclear weapon, the atom blasted apart then releases other neutrons which collide with other atoms. This keeps occurring until there are no atoms left to destroy. This is known as a nuclear chain reaction. In a nuclear fission power plant, however, the nuclear core is designed so that a runaway chain reaction cannot occur, by limiting the number of neutrons available to continue the reaction by the use of control rods<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/control.html</ref>.  
+
The energy released from a nuclear fission device is given by the mass–energy equivalence equation <math>E=mc^2</math>. Spelled out, the energy of a physical system equals it mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. This equation is the formula for the energy contained in an atom. This energy is released in a nuclear weapon when a speeding neutron collides with the atom, blasting it apart, and releasing the binding energy of the atom. In a nuclear weapon, the atom blasted apart then releases other neutrons which collide with other atoms. This keeps occurring until there are no atoms left to destroy. This is known as a nuclear chain reaction. In a nuclear fission power plant, however, the nuclear core is designed so that a runaway chain reaction cannot occur, by limiting the number of neutrons available to continue the reaction by the use of control rods<ref>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/control.html</ref>.  
Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is based on putting atoms together, as opposed to breaking them apart in fission, heavier atoms often require less bonding energy than the combined original binding energies of the fusing lighter atoms.
Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is based on putting atoms together, as opposed to breaking them apart in fission, heavier atoms often require less bonding energy than the combined original binding energies of the fusing lighter atoms.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:44:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:MattH</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Welcome!

New page

Welcome!

Hello, GregG/RSS 5, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, GregG/RSS 5!


--James Wilson 12:44, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:43:32 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Scott Walker</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

In 2012, Walker is likely to face a recall election.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:43, 26 March 2012
Line 19: Line 19:
Scott Walker became a leader of conservatives nationwide when he supported and then signed into law a repeal of the collective bargaining rights of most government workers.  Walker took this historic step to prevent the State from continuing on a path of financial ruin.
Scott Walker became a leader of conservatives nationwide when he supported and then signed into law a repeal of the collective bargaining rights of most government workers.  Walker took this historic step to prevent the State from continuing on a path of financial ruin.
 +
In 2012, Walker is likely to face a recall election.
==Budget Deficit==
==Budget Deficit==
Wisconsin has a budget deficit of more than $3 billion. Instead of raising taxes, the governor has set out on a mission to reduce costs across the board and to make Wisconsin a business-friendly state. The state's labor unions are in an uproar and are protesting Walker's decision to end union collective bargaining and force employees to fund part of their pensions, as well as to contribute to their own health and life insurance.
Wisconsin has a budget deficit of more than $3 billion. Instead of raising taxes, the governor has set out on a mission to reduce costs across the board and to make Wisconsin a business-friendly state. The state's labor unions are in an uproar and are protesting Walker's decision to end union collective bargaining and force employees to fund part of their pensions, as well as to contribute to their own health and life insurance.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:47:25 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: reply

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:47, 26 March 2012
Line 123: Line 123:
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
 
+
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:50:07 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Bruce Springsteen</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Springsteen's overly political album in 2012, ''Wrecking Ball'' featured a song titled "We Take Care of Our Own", which ironically criticizes Americans as self-centered, despite being some of the most

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:50, 26 March 2012
Line 3: Line 3:
He played the Super Bowl halftime show in 2009. <ref>http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/02/bruce-springste.html</ref>
He played the Super Bowl halftime show in 2009. <ref>http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/02/bruce-springste.html</ref>
 +
Springsteen's overly political album in 2012, Wrecking Ball featured a song titled "We Take Care of Our Own", which ironically criticizes Americans as self-centered, despite being some of the most charitable people in the world. Springsteen is supportive of liberal causes, and supported John Kerry in 2004 and Barack Hussein Obama in 2008. "We Take Care of Our Own" is going to be used in Obama's 2012 campaign.
==Political Activities==
==Political Activities==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:47:25 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...: reply

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:47, 26 March 2012
Line 123: Line 123:
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, please contribute something substantive instead of talking up a storm. Thanks.--James Wilson 11:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
 
+
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:44:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:MattH</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Welcome!

New page

Welcome!

Hello, GregG/RSS 5, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, GregG/RSS 5!


--James Wilson 12:44, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:43:32 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Scott Walker</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

In 2012, Walker is likely to face a recall election.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:43, 26 March 2012
Line 19: Line 19:
Scott Walker became a leader of conservatives nationwide when he supported and then signed into law a repeal of the collective bargaining rights of most government workers.  Walker took this historic step to prevent the State from continuing on a path of financial ruin.
Scott Walker became a leader of conservatives nationwide when he supported and then signed into law a repeal of the collective bargaining rights of most government workers.  Walker took this historic step to prevent the State from continuing on a path of financial ruin.
 +
In 2012, Walker is likely to face a recall election.
==Budget Deficit==
==Budget Deficit==
Wisconsin has a budget deficit of more than $3 billion. Instead of raising taxes, the governor has set out on a mission to reduce costs across the board and to make Wisconsin a business-friendly state. The state's labor unions are in an uproar and are protesting Walker's decision to end union collective bargaining and force employees to fund part of their pensions, as well as to contribute to their own health and life insurance.
Wisconsin has a budget deficit of more than $3 billion. Instead of raising taxes, the governor has set out on a mission to reduce costs across the board and to make Wisconsin a business-friendly state. The state's labor unions are in an uproar and are protesting Walker's decision to end union collective bargaining and force employees to fund part of their pensions, as well as to contribute to their own health and life insurance.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:41:42 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Rick Santorum</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Santorum endorsed RINO-turned-Democrat <a href="/Arlen_Specter" title="Arlen Specter">Arlen Specter</a>.

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:41, 26 March 2012
Line 16: Line 16:
In 2006 Bob Casey, Jr., the liberal son of a popular former Pennsylvania governor who had been pro-life, defeated Santorum as part of a Democratic sweep in that election.  Casey subsequently endorsed pro-abortion Barack Obama for president in 2008.
In 2006 Bob Casey, Jr., the liberal son of a popular former Pennsylvania governor who had been pro-life, defeated Santorum as part of a Democratic sweep in that election.  Casey subsequently endorsed pro-abortion Barack Obama for president in 2008.
 +
Santorum endorsed RINO-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter.
==Liberal Obsession with Santorum==
==Liberal Obsession with Santorum==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:52:32 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Love Me Tender</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:52, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Film
{{Infobox Film
| name=Love Me Tender
| name=Love Me Tender
-
| image=
+
| image=Love me tender.jpg
-
| caption=
+
| caption=Movie poster
| director= Robert D. Webb
| director= Robert D. Webb
| producer= David Weisbart
| producer= David Weisbart
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:50:07 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Bruce Springsteen</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Springsteen's overly political album in 2012, ''Wrecking Ball'' featured a song titled "We Take Care of Our Own", which ironically criticizes Americans as self-centered, despite being some of the most

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:50, 26 March 2012
Line 3: Line 3:
He played the Super Bowl halftime show in 2009. <ref>http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/02/bruce-springste.html</ref>
He played the Super Bowl halftime show in 2009. <ref>http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/02/bruce-springste.html</ref>
 +
Springsteen's overly political album in 2012, Wrecking Ball featured a song titled "We Take Care of Our Own", which ironically criticizes Americans as self-centered, despite being some of the most charitable people in the world. Springsteen is supportive of liberal causes, and supported John Kerry in 2004 and Barack Hussein Obama in 2008. "We Take Care of Our Own" is going to be used in Obama's 2012 campaign.
==Political Activities==
==Political Activities==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:54:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Elvis Presley movies</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:54, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
Elvis Presley (January 8, 1935- August 16, 1977) was a popular American musician, singer, and actor. He starred in thirty-three motion pictures throughout his acting career. In addition to these films, Presley worked on two unfinished karate films. This article is about his movies. For his albums, see Elvis Presley albums. For his other notable works such as songs, see Notable works of Elvis Presley.
Elvis Presley (January 8, 1935- August 16, 1977) was a popular American musician, singer, and actor. He starred in thirty-three motion pictures throughout his acting career. In addition to these films, Presley worked on two unfinished karate films. This article is about his movies. For his albums, see Elvis Presley albums. For his other notable works such as songs, see Notable works of Elvis Presley.
-
==Love Me Tender==
+
==[[Love Me Tender]]==
Love Me Tender was Presley's first film, and the song with the same title that was also used in the film was a #1 hit. It was originally called The Reno Brothers, but was changed as the song rose in popularity. It is a Western film and features  Richard Egan, Debra Paget, and Presley.
Love Me Tender was Presley's first film, and the song with the same title that was also used in the film was a #1 hit. It was originally called The Reno Brothers, but was changed as the song rose in popularity. It is a Western film and features  Richard Egan, Debra Paget, and Presley.
Presley Plays Clint Reno, the youngest of the four Reno brothers. He takes care of the house while his older brothers go to fight for the Confederates in the American Civil War.
Presley Plays Clint Reno, the youngest of the four Reno brothers. He takes care of the house while his older brothers go to fight for the Confederates in the American Civil War.
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Infobox Film
{{Infobox Film
| name=Loving You
| name=Loving You
-
| image=
+
| image=Loving you poster.jpg
-
| caption=
+
| caption= Movie poster
| director= Hal Kanter
| director= Hal Kanter
| producer= Hal B. Wallis
| producer= Hal B. Wallis
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:52:32 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Love Me Tender</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:52, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Film
{{Infobox Film
| name=Love Me Tender
| name=Love Me Tender
-
| image=
+
| image=Love me tender.jpg
-
| caption=
+
| caption=Movie poster
| director= Robert D. Webb
| director= Robert D. Webb
| producer= David Weisbart
| producer= David Weisbart
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:00:14 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>McDonald's</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

fix blunder

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:00, 26 March 2012
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
[[File:Mcdonalds-logo.png|right]]
+
[[File:McDonald's Golden Arches.png|right]]
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:02:21 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>McDonald's</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Regionalization: add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:02, 26 March 2012
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
[[File:Mcdonalds-logo.png|right]]
+
[[File:McDonald's Golden Arches.png|right]]
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
Line 45: Line 45:
== Regionalization ==
== Regionalization ==
 +
McDonald's caters to different international markets. In Israel, McDonalds' items are kosher.
McDonald's outlets outside of the US often have different menu items, and the formulations of some products may vary. For example, McDonald's sells rice in many Asian countries, and McDonald's Australia sells a wider range of 'healthy' foods, such as wraps with poached chicken, and has smaller portion sizes.
McDonald's outlets outside of the US often have different menu items, and the formulations of some products may vary. For example, McDonald's sells rice in many Asian countries, and McDonald's Australia sells a wider range of 'healthy' foods, such as wraps with poached chicken, and has smaller portion sizes.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:54:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Elvis Presley movies</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 16:54, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
Elvis Presley (January 8, 1935- August 16, 1977) was a popular American musician, singer, and actor. He starred in thirty-three motion pictures throughout his acting career. In addition to these films, Presley worked on two unfinished karate films. This article is about his movies. For his albums, see Elvis Presley albums. For his other notable works such as songs, see Notable works of Elvis Presley.
Elvis Presley (January 8, 1935- August 16, 1977) was a popular American musician, singer, and actor. He starred in thirty-three motion pictures throughout his acting career. In addition to these films, Presley worked on two unfinished karate films. This article is about his movies. For his albums, see Elvis Presley albums. For his other notable works such as songs, see Notable works of Elvis Presley.
-
==Love Me Tender==
+
==[[Love Me Tender]]==
Love Me Tender was Presley's first film, and the song with the same title that was also used in the film was a #1 hit. It was originally called The Reno Brothers, but was changed as the song rose in popularity. It is a Western film and features  Richard Egan, Debra Paget, and Presley.
Love Me Tender was Presley's first film, and the song with the same title that was also used in the film was a #1 hit. It was originally called The Reno Brothers, but was changed as the song rose in popularity. It is a Western film and features  Richard Egan, Debra Paget, and Presley.
Presley Plays Clint Reno, the youngest of the four Reno brothers. He takes care of the house while his older brothers go to fight for the Confederates in the American Civil War.
Presley Plays Clint Reno, the youngest of the four Reno brothers. He takes care of the house while his older brothers go to fight for the Confederates in the American Civil War.
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Infobox Film
{{Infobox Film
| name=Loving You
| name=Loving You
-
| image=
+
| image=Loving you poster.jpg
-
| caption=
+
| caption= Movie poster
| director= Hal Kanter
| director= Hal Kanter
| producer= Hal B. Wallis
| producer= Hal B. Wallis
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:03:37 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:HageDeangelis596</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/index.php?title=User:HageDeangelis596&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:HageDeangelis596 (page does not exist)">HageDeangelis596</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:HageDeangelis596&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:HageDeangelis596 (page does not exist)">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/HageDeangelis596" title="Special:Contributions/HageDeangelis596">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (autoblock disabled) user name policy: please consider recreating your account with a real first name and last initial: follows spammer username formula. Please recreate if not spammer

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:19:43 GMT (edit by NKeaton)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Rain:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:19, 26 March 2012
Line 539: Line 539:
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
::::You live in such a shamefully hate-filled and disjointed world, "Conservative". I pray that you seek mental health care and that someone with authority here do something to stop you from further harming this website. You're an embarrassment. Nate 13:19, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:03:37 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:HageDeangelis596</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/index.php?title=User:HageDeangelis596&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:HageDeangelis596 (page does not exist)">HageDeangelis596</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:HageDeangelis596&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:HageDeangelis596 (page does not exist)">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/HageDeangelis596" title="Special:Contributions/HageDeangelis596">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (autoblock disabled) user name policy: please consider recreating your account with a real first name and last initial: follows spammer username formula. Please recreate if not spammer

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:02:21 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>McDonald's</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Regionalization: add image

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:02, 26 March 2012
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
[[File:Mcdonalds-logo.png|right]]
+
[[File:McDonald's Golden Arches.png|right]]
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
McDonald's is an global fast-food chain specializing in hamburgers. It operates more than 30,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries on 6 continents.<ref>http://www.supersizeme.com/home.aspx?page=bythelb</ref> Although the first McDonald's was opened in California in 1940 by the McDonald brothers, the first franchise under the corporation as it exists today was opened by Ray Kroc in Illinois in 1955. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.
Line 45: Line 45:
== Regionalization ==
== Regionalization ==
 +
McDonald's caters to different international markets. In Israel, McDonalds' items are kosher.
McDonald's outlets outside of the US often have different menu items, and the formulations of some products may vary. For example, McDonald's sells rice in many Asian countries, and McDonald's Australia sells a wider range of 'healthy' foods, such as wraps with poached chicken, and has smaller portion sizes.
McDonald's outlets outside of the US often have different menu items, and the formulations of some products may vary. For example, McDonald's sells rice in many Asian countries, and McDonald's Australia sells a wider range of 'healthy' foods, such as wraps with poached chicken, and has smaller portion sizes.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:29:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:NKeaton</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/User:NKeaton" title="User:NKeaton" class="mw-userlink">NKeaton</a> (<a href="/User_talk:NKeaton" title="User talk:NKeaton">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/NKeaton" title="Special:Contributions/NKeaton">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) Intimidating behaviour/harassment

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:19:43 GMT (edit by NKeaton)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Rain:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:19, 26 March 2012
Line 539: Line 539:
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
::::You live in such a shamefully hate-filled and disjointed world, "Conservative". I pray that you seek mental health care and that someone with authority here do something to stop you from further harming this website. You're an embarrassment. Nate 13:19, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:30:42 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:30, 26 March 2012
Line 124: Line 124:
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:29:46 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/NKeaton" title="Special:Contributions/NKeaton">NKeaton</a> (<a href="/User_talk:NKeaton" title="User talk:NKeaton">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Conservative" title="User:Conservative">Conservative</a>

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:29, 26 March 2012
Line 539: Line 539:
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
::::You live in such a shamefully hate-filled and disjointed world, "Conservative". I pray that you seek mental health care and that someone with authority here do something to stop you from further harming this website. You're an embarrassment. Nate 13:19, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:29:11 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:NKeaton</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

blocked [[<a href="/User:NKeaton" title="User:NKeaton" class="mw-userlink">NKeaton</a> (<a href="/User_talk:NKeaton" title="User talk:NKeaton">Talk</a> | <a href="/Special:Contributions/NKeaton" title="Special:Contributions/NKeaton">contribs</a>)]] with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) Intimidating behaviour/harassment

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:40:40 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Spanish language</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:40, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
-
The Spanish language is a member of the Romance language family, the group of languages descending from Vulgar Latin, the dialect spoken by the soldiers and provincial officials of the Roman Empire. Originally spoken in the northern regions of what is now Spain, Spanish also draws some influence from the regional languages of its area. Spanish also draws heavy influence from Arabic, due to the Moorish occupation of Spain lasting from 711 to 1492.
+
The Spanish language is a member of the Romance language family, the group of languages descending from Vulgar Latin, the dialect spoken by the soldiers and provincial officials of the Roman Empire. Originally spoken in the northern regions of what is now Spain, Spanish also draws some influence from the regional languages of its area. Spanish was also influenced from Arabic, due to the Moorish occupation of Spain lasting from 711 to 1492.
Today, the majority of its speakers live outside of Spain, with large numbers in Central and South America. It is one of the most-spoken languages in the world. It is spoken as a first language by about 350,000,000 people, or by 417,000,000 if non-native speakers are included. The Spanish language is the second-most common language in the United States, as well as the second-most natively spoken language in the world, after Mandarin Chinese.
Today, the majority of its speakers live outside of Spain, with large numbers in Central and South America. It is one of the most-spoken languages in the world. It is spoken as a first language by about 350,000,000 people, or by 417,000,000 if non-native speakers are included. The Spanish language is the second-most common language in the United States, as well as the second-most natively spoken language in the world, after Mandarin Chinese.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:40:34 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Blanked the page

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=970669&oldid=970667">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:39:38 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Phukkwit</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:42:56 GMT (edit by AugustO)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:42, 26 March 2012
Line 126: Line 126:
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::You are posing excellent questions! Indeed it should be of interest for Aschlafly, too:
 +
:::Aschlafly, two protons (1.0073amu) and two neutrons (1.0087amu) have a combined mass of 4.0320 amu. An alpha-particle - existing from two protons and two neutrons - has a mass of 4.0015 amu. How do you explain this diminution of mass?
 +
:::AugustO 13:42, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:42:03 GMT (edit by NKeaton)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:#84343</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

unblocked #84343

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:41:59 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:Karajou</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Blanked the page

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=970672&oldid=970245">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:41:12 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:Aschlafly</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Blanked the page

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=970671&oldid=970535">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:40:40 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Spanish language</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:40, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
-
The Spanish language is a member of the Romance language family, the group of languages descending from Vulgar Latin, the dialect spoken by the soldiers and provincial officials of the Roman Empire. Originally spoken in the northern regions of what is now Spain, Spanish also draws some influence from the regional languages of its area. Spanish also draws heavy influence from Arabic, due to the Moorish occupation of Spain lasting from 711 to 1492.
+
The Spanish language is a member of the Romance language family, the group of languages descending from Vulgar Latin, the dialect spoken by the soldiers and provincial officials of the Roman Empire. Originally spoken in the northern regions of what is now Spain, Spanish also draws some influence from the regional languages of its area. Spanish was also influenced from Arabic, due to the Moorish occupation of Spain lasting from 711 to 1492.
Today, the majority of its speakers live outside of Spain, with large numbers in Central and South America. It is one of the most-spoken languages in the world. It is spoken as a first language by about 350,000,000 people, or by 417,000,000 if non-native speakers are included. The Spanish language is the second-most common language in the United States, as well as the second-most natively spoken language in the world, after Mandarin Chinese.
Today, the majority of its speakers live outside of Spain, with large numbers in Central and South America. It is one of the most-spoken languages in the world. It is spoken as a first language by about 350,000,000 people, or by 417,000,000 if non-native speakers are included. The Spanish language is the second-most common language in the United States, as well as the second-most natively spoken language in the world, after Mandarin Chinese.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:40:34 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Blanked the page

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=970669&oldid=970667">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:39:38 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:Phukkwit</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

New user account

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:30:42 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:30, 26 March 2012
Line 124: Line 124:
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::James Wilson, please don't interfere in interesting and substantive discussions. Thank you! Baobab 12:12, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::::"Baobab", please state what substance is coming out of this conversation. You have had a history of engaging in hefty talk. Please start contributing. I have had some great insights contributing in a few articles today and will continue to do so. Many thanks for your future contributions.--James Wilson 12:47, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:29:46 GMT (edit by JamesWilson)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Reverted edits by <a href="/Special:Contributions/NKeaton" title="Special:Contributions/NKeaton">NKeaton</a> (<a href="/User_talk:NKeaton" title="User talk:NKeaton">talk</a>) to last revision by <a href="/User:Conservative" title="User:Conservative">Conservative</a>

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:29, 26 March 2012
Line 539: Line 539:
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::CPalmer, I am certainly not anti-rain. :)  I merely quoted the verse to demonstrate the point that God is involved to some degree in weather/rain. The degree of involvement is not a matter I want to discuss at this point but the accounts of Noah, Elijah and the words/actions of Christ himself bolsters the view that God influences weather.  There are plenty of verses in the Bible to support this view. Conservative 09:50, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::I still think that the more interesting question is why these supposedly brilliant atheists couldn't plan around the weather forecast, or at least arrange some kind of wet weather alternative to their event.--CPalmer 09:56, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
-
::::You live in such a shamefully hate-filled and disjointed world, "Conservative". I pray that you seek mental health care and that someone with authority here do something to stop you from further harming this website. You're an embarrassment. Nate 13:19, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
== Has the scope of Conservapedia changed? ==
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:45:20 GMT (edit by MihailD)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Undo revision 970669 by <a href="/Special:Contributions/Phukkwit" title="Special:Contributions/Phukkwit">Phukkwit</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Phukkwit&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Phukkwit (page does not exist)">talk</a>)

<a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=970674&oldid=970669">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:46:17 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Common Latin</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

minor corrections

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:46, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Common Latin, also known as Vulgar Latin, is a collection of dialects spoken throughout the Roman Empire. These dialects were spoken by the common people and soldiers, hence "common". ("Vulgar" in this context is a synonym for "common".) The upper-class Latin spoken by the church and the government was a different [[dialect]], but it was mutually intelligible to speakers of Common Latin. Common Latin changed over time due to outside influences such as proto-German, and eventually developed into the Romance languages, which include French and Spanish.
+
Common Latin, also known as Vulgar Latin, is a collection of dialects spoken throughout the Roman Empire. These dialects were spoken by the common people and soldiers, hence "common". ("Vulgar" in this context is a synonym for "common".) The upper-class Latin spoken by the church and the government was a different [[sociolect]], but it was intelligible to speakers of Common Latin. Common Latin changed over time due to outside influences such as proto-German, and eventually developed into the Romance languages, which include French and Spanish.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:34 GMT (edit by MihailD)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:Aschlafly</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Undo revision 970671 by <a href="/Special:Contributions/Phukkwit" title="Special:Contributions/Phukkwit">Phukkwit</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Phukkwit&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Phukkwit (page does not exist)">talk</a>)

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=970677&oldid=970671">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:46:48 GMT (edit by MihailD)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:Karajou</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Undo revision 970672 by <a href="/Special:Contributions/Phukkwit" title="Special:Contributions/Phukkwit">Phukkwit</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Phukkwit&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Phukkwit (page does not exist)">talk</a>)

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=970676&oldid=970672">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:46:17 GMT (edit by Baobab)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Common Latin</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

minor corrections

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:46, 26 March 2012
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Common Latin, also known as Vulgar Latin, is a collection of dialects spoken throughout the Roman Empire. These dialects were spoken by the common people and soldiers, hence "common". ("Vulgar" in this context is a synonym for "common".) The upper-class Latin spoken by the church and the government was a different [[dialect]], but it was mutually intelligible to speakers of Common Latin. Common Latin changed over time due to outside influences such as proto-German, and eventually developed into the Romance languages, which include French and Spanish.
+
Common Latin, also known as Vulgar Latin, is a collection of dialects spoken throughout the Roman Empire. These dialects were spoken by the common people and soldiers, hence "common". ("Vulgar" in this context is a synonym for "common".) The upper-class Latin spoken by the church and the government was a different [[sociolect]], but it was intelligible to speakers of Common Latin. Common Latin changed over time due to outside influences such as proto-German, and eventually developed into the Romance languages, which include French and Spanish.
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:45:20 GMT (edit by MihailD)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:Main Page</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Undo revision 970669 by <a href="/Special:Contributions/Phukkwit" title="Special:Contributions/Phukkwit">Phukkwit</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Phukkwit&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="User talk:Phukkwit (page does not exist)">talk</a>)

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=970674&oldid=970669">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:42:56 GMT (edit by AugustO)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>Talk:E=mc²</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Aschlafly, could you give us...:

<col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' />
← Older revision Revision as of 17:42, 26 March 2012
Line 126: Line 126:
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
:::::"James Wilson", AugustO is clarifying things and giving us some great insights, as CPalmer's latest reply shows. Discussions will often lead to better articles, which is why your interference was totally uncalled for. I guess your only motive was to defend Mr. Schlafly, but he can take care of himself and really doesn't need your help. Regards, Baobab 13:30, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
::Thanks, AugustO. Relativity or no relativity, I am learning a lot from this discussion.--CPalmer 12:00, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::You are posing excellent questions! Indeed it should be of interest for Aschlafly, too:
 +
:::Aschlafly, two protons (1.0073amu) and two neutrons (1.0087amu) have a combined mass of 4.0320 amu. An alpha-particle - existing from two protons and two neutrons - has a mass of 4.0015 amu. How do you explain this diminution of mass?
 +
:::AugustO 13:42, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:42:03 GMT (edit by NKeaton)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User:#84343</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

unblocked #84343

 </body>

</html>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:41:59 GMT (edit by Phukkwit)

<html>

 <head>
   <title>User talk:Karajou</title>
   <base href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom">
 </head>
 <body id="msgFeedSummaryBody" selected="false">

Blanked the page

<a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&diff=970672&oldid=970245">Show changes</a>

 </body>

</html>

Personal tools