User:Jinxmchue
From Conservapedia
Jinxmchue, Accident Prone (which is just a fancy way of saying "klutz")
|
Contents |
Who am I?
I am a 36-year-old Christian conservative who has been married to an amazing woman for 9 wonderful years and who has an active 7-year-old son and an adorable 4-year-old daughter. For a little more about me, see the boxes to the right.
Why am I here?
Because Wikipedia sucks. Here's why:
1) Wiki really does have a liberal bias (duh!).
2) People can put any blasted information they want there no matter how faulty as long as it's "published" somewhere by someone or backed by lame "proof" (like what a person's organization's website sells).
3) As long as you have the letters "p," "h" and "d" after your name in that order and are a liberal, anything you say no matter how wrong, biased, unsupported or just plain stupid becomes gospel truth on Wiki if someone somewhere reproduced it online.
4) Liberals can defend their edits without repercussions but if a conservative does so, they are accused of edit warring, trolling, vandalism, disruption, etc.
5) As long as you can call in your buddies, you can sidestep the "three-revert rule" and indefinitely defend your edits without ever being accused of edit warring.
6) If one of your buddies is an admin, all the better.
7) See the Wikipedia article about D. James Kennedy (who apparently is a supporter of Intelligent Design now instead of a Bible-based, 6-literal-days, 6000-year-old-Earth, life-created-as-is Creationist).
8) Wikipedia now has at least two blatantly anti-Christian and anti-Intelligent Design admins (FeloniousMonk and Guettarda) who are among a larger group of jack-booted, pro-evolution thugs who tag-team against anyone who disagrees with their personal agenda to keep Wikipedia in accordance with their POV. They throw around personal attacks and baseless accusations without providing proof and use them to silence an opposing viewpoint. They also make sure to defend each other's edits and/or admin actions (e.g. blocking users) so that they can't be undone. This tag-teaming also conveniently subverts Wikipedia's "three-revert rule."
9) Reliable, established news sources like NewsMax are rejected as not meeting Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources, but blog entries by people like PZ Myers are viciously defended (without any arguments of merit) as reliable sources despite failing every guideline for such.
Whence "Jinxmchue?"
My username (which I have used elsewhere in various forms: "Jinx McHue," "Jinx72," etc.) is a combination of two things:
- "Jinx" is the name of an old Advanced Dungeons and Dragons character of mine who was a hornhead saurial "wild mage" (user of "wild magic" from the AD&D Tome of Magic). Hornheads are normally mute and 10 feet tall, but the dungeon master didn't like either idea, so he had Jinx shortened by a curse and given an amulet that allowed him to speak. As a wild mage, Jinx was prone to "wild surges," or strange, random and unexpected magical effects. Jinx's most prized possession was a wand of wonder, which he as a wild mage could occasionally control (via a random die roll) in order to power any of the spells he knew (i.e. he did not need to have them memorized). Unfortunately, both Jinx's wild surges and the use of the wand of wonder seemed to lead to very unfortunate circumstances at the most inopportune times. For example, when attacked by some fish creatures while in a small boat, Jinx tried to cast a lightning bolt into the water. Instead of a lightning bolt, a large volume of water directly next to the boat simply vanished. (Thankfully, everyone survived the ensuing crash of water and boat filling up the space.) In another incident, Jinx tried to charm an injured enemy... from a safe distance. The precaution turned out to be very prescient as the enemy became ground zero for a fireball. (These series of in-game misfortunes oddly and appropriately reflected my real life, as I am very accident prone.)
- [Note: sadly, I do not play tabletop RPGs of any kind anymore. My life has taken a new direction now that I am a husband and father.]
- "McHue" is a concept borrowed from a friend. In creating part of a nickname/screenname, he used the first syllable of his last name preceded by "Mc." I have done the same.
- My real first name, if you must know, is Jason. They Might Be Giants killed me off along with "countless screaming Argonauts."
Shameless plug for my blog
Shock & Blog - shamelessly conservative commentary
Articles I've created
- Brad Stine (bulk; originally created by me on Wikipedia)
- Left Behind: Eternal Forces
- Jeb Eddy
- Jim Ronca
- Democratic Underground
- American Family Radio
- Fireproof (film)
Insults I've [proudly] received
According to some, I...
- ...am "a deep cover sock" because I am "far too stupid and malevolent to be a real person"
- ..."don't matter," my opinion "doesn't matter to anybody" and am "a nobody" (Yet they can't resist talking about me behind my back like the cowards they are.)
- ...am "a dumb***" and a "proper crawly bumcrawler" who is "no fun" ("Crawly bumcrawler?" People really say things like that? Without being embarrassed?)
Then there's the accusation that I'm anti-Semitic. While I'm not exactly proud of being called that, I'm proud that I've been such a thorn in the sides of liberals that they've whipped themselves up into a frothing frenzy and have been reduced to inventing this baseless lie. When they start going down that path, they're admitting defeat and it is very, very difficult for them to get off it because their bloated egos won't allow them to retract it and apologize.
On parodists/moles
They try just too darn hard. They also trip themselves up unwittingly and then can't figure out how. For example, the moles' nest is at a loss as to why I recently banned one of their kin. They think it is about one issue, but it's really about a different issue - one that was brought up on their scummy site mere moments before it was brought up here by the person I banned. (Simply an amazing, amazing coincidence that.) And they still won't be able to figure it out what the issue was even with these blatantly obvious clues of mine.
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
"Ed Poor makes it failry impossible to add any info that is beyond a first grade eduction level. Look at his revision history, he is clearly not the most cerebral of editors." AMcW 20:54, 5 August 2008 (EDT)"
Laptop computer: $1000
Internet connection: $40
Rent for mom's basement: $0
Misspelling words while trying to criticize other people's intelligence: Priceless
Jinx's Law
"The more people proclaim themselves to be something, they less likely they actually will be it."
Variant 1 (aka the Castro Street Variant):
"The more tolerant people proclaim themselves to be, the less tolerant they actually are of people different from themselves."
Variant 2 (aka the Obsessed and Unhinged Variant):
"The more rational people proclaim themselves to be, the more irrational they actually are."
Variant 3 (aka the Neo-Liberal Variant):
"The more open-minded people proclaim themselves to be, the more closed-minded they actually are."
Variant 4 (aka the B. Hussein Variant):
"The more dedicated to freedom of speech people proclaim themselves to be, the more they are prone to try to censor free speech."
The lesson:
"If you want to be something, just be it. Quietly. Humbly. Other people will recognize it without you having to point it out. The moment you start bellowing 'Look at me! Look how ________ I am!' is the moment you open yourself up to being exactly the opposite of what you claim to be."
Proving Jinx's Law: Example 1
Apparently there's a mainline "tolerant" church in England that has blocked Conservapedia on its internet server because CP is (supposedly) intolerant of gays, evolution, unbelief and tolerance (yeah, we're intolerant of tolerance, I guess). So... we're being blocked because this supposedly "tolerant" church is intolerant of conservative beliefs. Ironic. And people apparently support this form of censorship, too. Only because its being done by a mainline church, of course. If this were, say, a conservative church blocking access to liberal websites, these same clowns would be hopping, frothy mad.
Proving Jinx's Law: Example 2
Liberals are big-time privacy advocates, particularly when it comes to their misconceptions about programs the government uses to spy on known and suspected terrorists. Unsurprisingly, though, they had no problem with someone on their side hacking into Sarah Palin's Yahoo! email account, nor did they have a problem posting the stolen contents all over their websites. "Privacy for me, not for thee."
