User talk:Conservateur

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

While I welcome your efforts, some of your edits seem over-the-top. Vandalism resulted in calling Jimmy Carter one of the greatest American Presidents. But calling him one of the worst American Presidents instead? That doesn't seem encyclopedic either. Also, while I don't have a strong opinion about this, identifying the ethnicity of someone in the first line of the entry (e.g., identifying Oppenheimer as "Jewish") also seems non-encyclopedic and a bit gossipy.--Aschlafly 17:00, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

This appears a little provocative. [1] RobS 17:04, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Yes, I agree. Conservateur, please don't go through and replace "African-American" with "black" in other people's work here. Thanks.--Aschlafly 17:18, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
The term "African-American" is too much political correctness. It implies that an entire race living in this country has a dual loyalty. I have seen many cases in Conservapedia referring to "white" people instead of Caucasian-American or European-American. Why the double standard? I guess this is probably a pointless debate anyway, so if African-American is the preferred term for black people, that's fine and I'll use it from this point forward.--Conservateur 17:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I didn't think it was necessary to couch the statement about Carter in terms of something conservatives believe, since Conservapedia is presenting the facts from a conservative perspective already. In the future I'll just try to leave well enough alone.--Conservateur 17:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Contents

Scopes Trial

I removed this edit because it is completely unrelated to the scopes trial. I'm guessing you thought you were editing another article. Cheers. HeartOfGold 20:24, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

Opps, sorry, I did not see the discussion in the talk page. While I stand by the removal (since there is no logical link to Gore and the Scopes trial other than both events occurring in Tennessee), you are free to take it up with Andy or other sysops. HeartOfGold 20:45, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

Democratic Party

I don't care about what your own political beliefs are, but ranting about Jews on Democratic Party - with a blatant opinion and stereotyping of both political parties - will not be tolerated. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 22:40, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

I certainly disagree that it was a rant, and I don't feel it was necessary to excise the entire paragraph when it could have been reworded. My goal was to demonstrate the curious phenomenon of how Jews vote overwhelmingly for democrats despite what appears to be a lack of shared beliefs and principles. And I don't see how it's any different from the passage that points out how black Christians vote democrat despite that party's support for homosexuals.--Conservateur 12:31, 29 May 2007 (EDT)


Warning

I've taken a look at some of your last edits, and they are somewhat troubling in my opinion and seem overly polemical. The edit about Jews and the Democratic Party was troubling, as was your blatant caricature of all liberals as plagiarizers and suggestion that we re-direct "s-e-x" to abstinence. I'd like to ask that you tone it down, because some of your edits seem like parodies to me. Thank you. DanH 14:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

If you would care to read directly above, I was already harangued by Hojiamachong for my Democrat Party edit, whereupon I explained myself. As for the "blatant caricature of all liberals as plagiarizers", I did no such thing, and besides, it didn't seem to bother Aschlafly, who immediately followed my response with a similar one of his own.--Conservateur 16:29, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
  • Hiding behind Andy isn't a particularly bright thing to do, and would not stop me from reversing any editor, nor stop me from blocking them. Sorry, I never read the above before, and yes, I know it was months ago! Anyway, my gripe this morning is this: [[2]] . Please try to control the editorial content of your edit notes, okay? The user cannot be made out to be a Troll from the content of their edits in that particular case. Play nicely, please? You are now free to move about the country. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 03:51, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

Good eye

Thanks for catching false information in the list of body organs; I notice you've caught stuff there more than once. DanH 17:05, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Personal tools