User talk:CraigF2

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

What up Craig? Some of your articles on cars made the news. [1] Good work and keep 'em coming. --Jpatt 14:10, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

WOW! The liberal media can't handle the truth. Even though it sounds like they are complaining, they can't argue the facts. Thanks for unblocking me BTW. CraigF2 17:36, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

Please explain BHO's "mind control" techniques in the absence of his teleprompter, and why such an allegation must be included in your last edits. Karajou 21:54, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

I can't find it, but Professor Schlafly has posted links on the mainpage several times showing that BHO uses mind control techniques in his speeches with the teleprompter. I disagree that he is intentionally using mind control, but it is borderline. If you strongly disagree, I'll differ to your judgment, but please reinstate the rest of my edit. It updated a seriously out of date but important page. CraigF2 21:59, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
You may reinstate the rest of the edit, but leave out the "mind control" portion. Karajou 22:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
Thank you. CraigF2 22:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT)



What exactly did you mean by that comment. Care to back it up?brenden 19:45, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

[2][3][4][5]These are a bunch of edits where MattyD removes facts that disagree with his liberal ideology. CraigF2 19:48, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
Orly? As a matter of fact, he was right, as that kind of personal opinion is a violation of CP:MOS. Liberal can mean a lot of things to different people.brenden 19:57, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
"A liberal is someone who favors censorship of Christianity plus increased government spending and power, as in ObamaCare. Increasingly liberals side with the homosexual agenda, including same-sex marriage. Many liberals favor a welfare state where people receive endless entitlements without working. Liberals are often anti-Christian, or otherwise disagree with moral or social principles held by many American Christians. The liberal ideology has worsened over the years and degenerated into economically delusional views and intolerant ideology. Some liberals simply support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of conservative principles without having any meaningful values of their own." Seems pretty clear what "liberal" means, but if you think this site should support liberal whitewashing of facts (only opinions in the minds of liberals) then who am I to argue? CraigF2 20:09, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
It looks like brenden is in fact a liberal who supports the lie of evolution and the big bang rather than creation. I have no idea why he is allowed to hide facts on this website. CraigF2 20:12, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
Watch your mouth. Civility will be enforced here. This will be your last warning.brenden 15:29, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

I would appreciate it if you would stop.

I would appreciate it if you would stop making mean-spirited and snarky comments directed at me. First off, it's against the collaborative nature of a wiki project. Secondly, it's just not something decent human beings do. It's also not particularly Christian in nature, if that's worth anything to you. I make edits meant to improve the quality of the articles, in terms of readability and accuracy, I am not trying to grind an ax. Which brings me to another point. Please do not make assumptions about my politics based on edits designed to make an article more readable or more accurate. You have been very angry and confrontational with me for several days now, and that does nobody any good, least of all yourself. Enjoy the evening. MattyD 19:44, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

Matty, it might be because of snide comments "Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's.....SUPERCAR!!!!!" and your attempt to correct everything related to Craig. So back off as well. --Jpatt 20:19, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

It wasn't vandalism

If you truly are a student, you need to study grammar and spelling. Three of your last eight edits contain errors: [6] [7] [8] That's not a very good percentage. You might want to consider the idea of applying yourself to your books. SharonW 20:42, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

Try harder Craig but don't listen to Sharon. She matters not here, she contributes next to nothing.--Jpatt 20:50, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

As I said to mattyD

I think the two of you should stop interacting with each other. Any faults found with each other can be dealt with by someone else, not the two parties. Thanks, brenden 22:52, 14 September 2012 (EDT)

That sounds like great idea. Please tell him to stop following me around and I wont mess with his edits unless they show outrageous liberalism. CraigF2 22:56, 14 September 2012 (EDT)
He doesn't seem to be upholding his side of the bargain. I'll stick by what I said for now, but he needs to be put on a short leash. CraigF2 23:07, 15 September 2012 (EDT)

"we don't quote liberal rags like the New York Times."

I'm sorry, but that was YOUR source. YOU brought in the Times to back up your assertion. All I did was re-write the relevant passage to reflect what YOUR source, the one YOU wanted to use, actually said. MattyD 09:15, 15 September 2012 (EDT)

We could find a better source than the Old York Times. --James Wilson 09:16, 15 September 2012 (EDT)
Sure, I agree. But this guy brought in the Times, misquoted it, and then decided that his source was no good only after it didn't say what it wanted him to. It's pretty disingenuous to use a source on one day and then denigrate it the very next day when it gets inconvenient. Especially when this is the second time in a few days that an editor has gone to that very source. MattyD 09:21, 15 September 2012 (EDT)
Ah, I see. --James Wilson 09:24, 15 September 2012 (EDT)
It's called reading between the lines. If the NYT says something that is against liberals it must be true and is probably far worse than they say. CraigF2 22:52, 15 September 2012 (EDT)

Salutations, apology, etc.

Hello, Craig. My sincerest apologies about blocking this account- I was enforcing CP's no multi account rules and there are exceptions to the rule such as this. I would rather unblock your initial account and block this one, but I don't think it's my place to do so. Nonetheless, thank you for editing Conservapedia. As for MattyD censoring your edits, I'll revert if necessary. I may even block him (or let someone else do so) if he keeps up his liberal nonsense, as I did with AMagic just now. Just let myself or User:Jpatt know if he keeps bothering you. Liberal rags like the Old York Times have little place here, and, as you say, can be used to show the decline of liberalism. --James Wilson 19:35, 16 September 2012 (EDT)


The Chevy Volt article needs citations for the material you provided.--NormaN 14:44, 20 April 2013 (EDT)

Personal tools