User talk:Darkmind1970

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Darkmind1970, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Darkmind1970!


Philip J. Rayment 08:57, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Please don't argue with the Young Earth Creationists. If you think Creation Science disagrees with mainstream geology, join or start one of our Debate Topics. --Ed Poor Talk 12:17, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Had to revert your main page edit. You have to take up Trump's hairstyle with Trump himself...you can't do it here. Karajou 11:36, 19 September 2008 (EDT)

Ok, this wiki has now reached the point of no return and has literally become a joke. Any entries that contradict the increasingly shrill view of the tiny group of editors that remain on this site are being reverted and the authors banned. This is censorship of the first order. This is wrong and if this cannot be seen then there really is no hope for this site. The atheism and obesity article is now so ridiculous that it makes me cringe just looking at it. I know a large number of thin atheists and an equally large number of fat churchgoers. Going around saying that 'X' is true because you believe it, and not basing this on verifiable proof from multiple sources, is just a ridiculous way of going about things. This site has not only jumped the shark, but has jumped the entire aquarium and is now stranded on the freeway, wriggling desperately as it tries to pretend that a) it's still swimming along nicely and b) the oncoming traffic of reality is in fact non-existant or made up. Darkmind1970 06:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)

And what are we censoring? The liberal point of view that is rampant within Wikipedia? And for what reasons are we banning people from editing? Are you implying that those people who force their point of view upon this site or engage in vandalism should be allowed to do so? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black: you ridicule satire related to atheism, but you had a hand in pushing gossip (Trump's toupee?) on the site which was reverted. Karajou 13:06, 12 February 2011 (EST)
Personal tools