User talk:Elamdri

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Somebody told me you're a feminist. This true?

Support equal rights for women, but not hardcore feminism.--Elamdri 20:20, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Elamdri, this is a warning. You seem to be going through numerous entries and inserting an obnoxious header that adds no value. I requested that you contribute material, not deface numerous entries. Please stop it and contribute some meaningful information. Thanks.--Aschlafly 21:35, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Elamdri, there is a second stub template that is MUCH less obnoxious. it is at {{stub2}} It looks like this:


Try using it from now on. Oh, and put it at the bottom of the page, not at the top. Same with the other stub template. GofG 21:53, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
That's a great idea: at the bottom of the page, not the top. That way the user can get the information that is available first, and then see the suggestion to improve. Thank you, GofG! (By the way, I'll reply to your email next.)--Aschlafly 21:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
EXCELLENT edit about the Shiites and Sunnis. Thank you, Elamdri!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aschlafly (talk)

I removed the stub2 example as my usertalk was being listed in the articles for improvement page--Elamdri 03:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

BRAVO on cleaning AwaitingTheRapture's page moves! --Hojimachongtalk 21:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
They just came back as User:AyiaNapa... I'll get this one, keep refreshing RC. --Hojimachongtalk 21:32, 13

March 2007 (EDT)

Sorry, I didn't intend to move your user page back! MountainDew 21:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Did you allow for account recreation in your last block in which you told him to select a new one? That is, in fact, the only way he could make a new one... --<<-David R->> 12:39, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

K, good job! --<<-David R->> 12:43, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Oh, I'm not liberal at all. I just consider myself right in the middle. And yes, you can play nice, no problem with that. Anyways, the article on Japan, I see you deleted it because it was copy and pasted from Wikipedia... but it wasn't. I copy and pasted before I realized the whole "GNU copyright etc thingamabob", which was a day or two ago, and has since been changed back to its old state (or so I believe). Any way to get it back?--Blozrav 19:31, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Contents

Tyrannosaurus rex

Just as a note, "rex" should actually be lower-case because it is the species name. Genus (in this case "Tyrannosaurus") is always capitalized while species is not. Dinosaurus 13:51, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Ryan's gone! Hee hee! GP 15:37, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
This vandal has been blocked. Geo. 15:46, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Discussion

Hello Elamdri, I appreciate that you notified me that you cut, and moved and pasted my proposal that we set our bar above information appearing on personal websites. You appear to be a legal sysop (I am a 20 year old legal), so I would be interested in your reaction to my proposal. The reason I posted it as an individual (not ongoing discussion) proposal has to do with it being a proposal to action, that is, it might actually become a method we use. But when posted as part of an ongoing discussion, you see, it gets lost in the noise, so to speak. Sincerely..Terryeo 14:32, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

I understand your point. I'll say its ok, but in general it is nice to keep the talk pages relatively uncluttered.--Elamdri 17:36, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

While you're at it

User:Lulzmobile just blanked McCarthy as well... I am usually opposed to protecting pages but protecting a featured article might not be a bad idea. Myk 19:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

I have a severe reaction to the concept of defending McCarthy but it had to be done. Myk 19:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for your quick work in banning Lulzmobile, and in protecting the page, Elamdri!--Aschlafly 20:07, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
No thanks for me! Myk 20:27, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Judges

Hi, thanks for your note about Judges, but I think it would be much more consistent if the legal term were moved to its singular version (thus:Judge), which is the standard in most reference works, while leaving Judges for the book of the Bible. Eventually, we'll need a disarticulation page, but for now I think this is far preferable to having all the books of the Bible having to be titled "Book of Leviticus" or "Leviticus (Book of the Bible)" or some such awkwardness. Also, given that all that exists as Judges is a stub that has been tagged as a VSA, now seems the time to do it.

Boethius 09:48, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

Thanks for monitoring the Scientology article and reverting the removal of science fiction, I would very much welcome your continued efforts to keep the article in good shape! Tmtoulouse 12:51, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Major Bias Removal and Deletion

There needs to be a better way to deal with this. Figuratively taking the article out and shooting it is a disgrace. Good job. Flippin 10:51, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

I respect the work you do, but it seems you and some others are often more willing to lock and delete than debate and correct. No one says you have a kick me sign on--you volunteer. -And trolls have just as much right to work on this site as anyone else. Flippin 10:56, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Your deletion of the Major Bias page was juvenile. I would have thought that someone studying law would have a better grasp of process. The AFD discussion favoured retention. Explain yourself. --Horace 00:21, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Your reasoning provided here is not really convincing. I don 't know who deleted previous pages nor why they did it. I do know that a number of people had taken the time to discuss that particular page and most of them were in favour of retention. Just exactly who do you think you are to make that decision unilaterally? --Horace 01:15, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Deal. I should say that I understand that the page might have ruffled feathers. You will have seen that I put an entry on it (which I felt strongly about). I am just a bit concerned about some of the behaviour on the site and I think it would be healthy if some internal criticism could be tolerated. I thank you for your gentlemanly response. --Horace 01:40, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Ban Powers

You mention "Either play nice, or I will start dropping the Ban Hammer." in response to a member of this site. Can I get banned for asking you to explain why so many sites are locked and deleted and you (and others) will not edit them? It seems to protect yourselves from vandalism, you've given up the purpose of this wiki--to defend the truth. Maybe your time would be etter spent not "dropping the ban hammer" and instead fixing the bias you find. Flippin 11:06, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Natural Disaster

Indeed. Call me suspicious, but I'm not convinced all of the contributors are entirely genuine... Tsumetai 12:11, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, as long as one of us is watching, we should be OK. I'm good for another hour or so. Tsumetai 12:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

CP:AID

Hello, You recently expressed your opinion at CP:AID. After voting, it has become obvious that the first article to improve is Germany and any related articles. Details will be posted soon at CP:AID, check there tomorrow for details. Thanks! --Hojimachongtalk 15:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Joseph McCarthy Article

I have some additions and edits to make for the Joseph McCarthy article. If you'll look back on my past edits there, you will see that I am not a vandal and follow the rules laid down in the Conservapedia commandments. Please let me know how I can get my edits into the article. --PF Fox 13:02, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

This should go near the beginning of the article because it's a detailed description of how McCarthy became a household word:

It was McCarthy's charges of Communist infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, West Virginia at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated:

“And ladies and gentlemen, while I cannot take the time to name all the men in the State Department who have been named as active members of the Communist Party and members of a spy ring, I have here in my hand a list of 205 – a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department.”[1]

The State Department denied McCarthy’s claims. In a radio interview in Utah the following day, McCarthy had changed the number to 57, and on February 11, in Reno at the Mapes Hotel, McCarthy again invoked the number 57 instead of 205, and named Robert Service, Gustavo Duran, Mary Jane Keeney and Harlow Shapley as being on the list. Several days later, when McCarthy was speaking to the Senate in Washington DC, the number had changed to 81.” [2]

The source for the original number McCarthy offered, “205,” turned out to be a letter written in 1946 by Secretary of State James Byrnes in reply to a question from Democratic Congressman Adolph Sabath about the screening of several thousand federal employees in the wake of post-war reassignments. There was no mention of either Communist party membership or names in that letter. The names McCarthy later offered in Reno came from a 1948 report by an ex-FBI agent Robert E. Lee on “incidents of inefficiencies” in the state department that had subsequently been passed on to the HUAC.

Thomas C. Reeves painstakingly well-documented 1982 biography of McCarthy includes part of the exchange in the Senate between Senator McCarthy and Democratic Majority Leader Scott Lucas on February 20th, during which McCarthy offered evidence for his claims by going through the Lee list. There were marked differences between what the Lee report actually said, and what Senator McCarthy claimed on the Senate floor. For instance, the Lee list read:

“The subject was described in reports by various witnesses as interested in communism as an experiment but his political philosophy is in keeping with liberal New Deal social reform under democratic processes of government; ‘he is a very ardent New Dealer; he is a live liberal;’ but an informant who also lived in the International House at one time said ‘He was one of those accused of being a Red here but the people who do get up and talk communism are refuted.’”

McCarthy read this as “He was described in reports by various witnesses as interested in communism and by his roommate at the International House as a communist.”

Where the Lee list read "This employee is with the office of Information and Educational Exchange in New York City. His application is very sketchy. There has ben no investigation. (C-8) is a reference. Though he is 43 years of age, his file reflects no history prior to June 1941. Case is awaiting a report from the New York Office."

McCarthy read: "This individual is 43 years of age. He is with the Office of Information and Education. According to the file, he is a known Communist. I am not evaluating the information myself, I am merely giving you what is in the file. This individual also found his way into the Voice of America broadcast. Apparently the easiest way to get in is to be a known Communist." [3]

Another edit should go into the section on the Army Signal Corps hearings. The following: "When electrical engineer Carl Greenblum broke down and wept during Roy Cohn’s cross-examination and had to be led, visibly upset, from the closed door session..." should include the parenthetical comment (Greenblum's mother had died two days before) so that it reads "When electrical engineer Carl Greenblum broke down and wept during Roy Cohn’s cross-examination (Greenblum's mother had died two days before) and had to be led, visibly upset, from the closed door session..."

--PF Fox 12:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Please take a look....

At the "Abuse" page, last item, "Abuse of sysop priviledge". [[1]] I posted there that I would ask a few other Sysop's to look at what they are talking about. Please don't rush, and consider the edits, etc. Your decision if you want to post there, what you think, or wherever. THANKS! Please, you can thank me later for this good turn. --~ TerryK Talk2Me! 08:19, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

  • I don't want anything. I posted I would ask some other Sysop's about the things they were complaining about. So, I put messages on a few others, like you. Seemed pretty simple and easy thing to ask of a Law Major. The articles they were complaining about were, as I said, under the title "Abuse of sysop priviledge" and were done by RobS. The were complaining about two pages in particular, Hitler and Liberals. I thought his work was fine. Sorry to have bothered you. --~ TerryK Talk2Me! 10:08, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Stub2

Fixed via redirect from "Stub2" to the normal "Stub" template. Thanks for pointing it out, but this way, you poor admins don't have to make 166 minor edits ;) --Sid 3050 08:41, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

British?

Are you British? I'm curious; inferring from your user page, which says you're a "legal major" as opposed to a "law student" (like me) in the US. That's awesome. I'm pretty curious about UK law: across the pond, we rely a lot on you guys in Torts & Criminal Law. Is that reliance two-way? I'm very curious.-AmesGyo 20:53, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Cool man! I didn't know many American schools provided pre-law as an undergrad major. It'll come in handy, take my word for it. When I worked in Parliament, I learned that law was fully an undergrad degree there (!!!) so I just assumed. When you get to looking for law schools, have a look at NYU. That's where I am, and I love it.-AmesGyo! 21:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
I don't buy into the law & economics bent at Chicago Law, and I hate their professors that guest-teach at NYU for their law & econ bent. But Chicago is one of the top ten (isn't it?) and it is a little more conservative than most. NYU Law is higher ranked, but much more liberal, which I don't mind (obviously I like it) but you might, and that's fine. It's outrageously expensive, though, too. $60k/year living & tuition :-O. But the education is top notch, and the people are really nice! -AmesGyo! 21:20, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Since you get notice, why reply on the other's page? --~ TerryK MyTalk 21:37, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
So they get a notice of my reply.--Elamdri 21:38, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Oh..I have auto watch enabled, which notifies me of any response on pages I post on. It was the default here, never considered others didn't use it, lol. --~ TerryK MyTalk 21:42, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
I don't want to get all cluttered with that, why I don't use it.--Elamdri 21:43, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Oh my! That's a Liberal thought...I am adding you to "that" list! ROFL! --~ TerryK MyTalk 22:17, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

If you like

Enjoy the use of this template if you like {{liberal}}. I was going to turn it into a six pointed star but I thought that would be too much. Myk 08:51, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

jurisprudence

I noticed your interest in legal topics. Please work on an outstanding article for Jurisprudence, including citations to the greats - Kelsen, Schmitz, Heller, Posner, etc. Thank you for your attention in this matter. --Huey gunna getcha 15:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

War in Iraq

I saw your post on the discussion page and got to a sentence which looked odd but didn't want to edit another person's comments, to wit:There are more real reasons to go to war with Iraq. I'm assuming you meant IraN? Crackertalk

Duh nevermind. I shloud read the entire post b4 jumping in. Crackertalk


Morality

Perhaps other Sysops here should refrain from being sucked into non-disputes made up by vengeful people who believe their "maintenace" duties make them elite, and contact the Sysop responsible for revising a non-page and locking it? Did I perhaps miss the memo you received appointing you the conflict manager? The editing done was not "prudent" or minimal. --~ TerryK MyTalk 01:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Again, WHY are the sources not credible? Why?

Again, WHY are the sources not credible? Why? And please keep this on the Planned Parenthood talk page. I want Aschlafly to see what you write. Conservative 02:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

Andy did ask me to remove the armyofgod one, but I found a different source for the same quote. MountainDew 02:44, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

As Elamdri appears to be AWOL, I'll chip in. The reason the sources are not credible is that while they cite a source, they are not the original source. One of the sources cited appeared to be a magazine from the 1920s. Go to the library, look it up, read it, cite that and THAT is a reliable source. That's how research works. Myk 02:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
please keep this on the relevant talk page. and which statement in the article on Conservapedia is relying on a poor source? Conservative 02:56, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

It would be useful if, in making the statement you do, Myk, to actually source the source you are talking about. --~ TerryK MyTalk 02:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

I'm not AWOL, I'm just researching this more. I'm giving Conservative the benefit of the doubt that I was wrong, and so I am researching his edits. That is how gentlemen conduct disagreements anyway.--Elamdri 03:04, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Gee whiz, TK< didn't you just tell off Elamdri for putting his nose in where it didn't belong? Per Conservative's "order", I responded on the talk page for Planned Parenthood. This unsigned snipe was added by User:myk

  • I made a completely fair request, and that is what you return? How can one decide the veracity of someones post, when they don't go the additional step of actually saying what the suspect source was? That applies to not just the poster above, but anyone.--~ TerryK MyTalk 03:20, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
Alright, DO NOT GET INTO IT ON MY TALK PAGE. You are all adults (hopefully), so settle it like adults. Go fight over it in a third world country.--Elamdri 03:24, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
It's all yours, mate. I am so sick of the bullying of him and TK, but if you want to take care of it, it's all yours. This site is going to become such a ridiculous joke it won't even work as a polemic. Myk 03:50, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
All I am concerned about is trying to be as factually accurate as possible. Part of the reasons many of my edits are small is because I am admittedly not an expert, and do not have the time right now to do extensive research.--Elamdri 15:20, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Wiki

I've found (by trial and error since the "help files" here don't always...help) when using the hash (#) for numbered statements do NOT have an extra return, but keep it tight, together. Doing it that way gives the wikiware the heads-up and will properly count UP the points instead of 1. 1. 1. I'da done this via email but as you don't have an addy set... Crackertalk 09:30, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, I realized that, I guess I goofed when I added in those quotes. Thanks!--Elamdri 15:21, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

aborted babies pic - No problem I found substitute links. I did find those that everything that site said was credible

aborted babies pic - No problem I found substitute links. I did find those that everything that site said was credible through my cross checking of sources. Conservative 16:33, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

Thats ok, sorry I questioned your links. And thank you for finding less graphic links.--Elamdri 16:45, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Email

Unfortunately you added the bit about subject line AFTER I had emailed you. Pity. --~ TerryK MyTalk 18:27, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Its ok, I still got it. I knew who it was.--Elamdri 18:29, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

hey

I forget how to sign. I thought it was just ~ Or something. Sorry bout that.

Unblock Everwill

Hi, Elamdri. I'm one of the sysops here, too, and I'd like to ask you to unblock the account of Everwill (talk • contribs • count). He's a friend from Wikipedia whom I invited over here. I'm not sure what he did 'wrong' as the block log only says "copy and paste from Wikipedia". Does that really merit an instant ban? I'm sure if we explain to him what he did wrong, he won't repeat it. He really wants to help. And I vouch for him. --Ed Poor 17:41, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

I went ahead and unblocked Everwill - hope no feelings were hurt. --Ed Poor 18:00, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Most likely, Ed, on Andy's top of the do's and don'ts is copying anything, quoting anything from Wikipedia, lol. I agree with the warning, however. Your not taking those mean pills I sent to you? I take four per day, you should only take two! --~ TerryK MyTalk 19:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
I've sent him an apology email. I didn't realize he had written the article. I just saw the direct copy. Usually copies are a vandal or someone ripping someone else's work. I'll try to be a bit more lenient since this happened.--Elamdri 20:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Debate moves

I asked Andy, and he said yes :-/. It makes more sense. --Hojimachongtalk 23:30, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

What's the big deal?

Why did you wipe my debate page and why did you block me?

Hey Elamdri, Karajou's trying to unblock Myk's IP address, but I think he can't find the IP... could you help?-AmesGyo! 01:24, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the assist, Elamdri. Myk 01:32, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Np--Elamdri 01:33, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
  • And here I thought it was me...I clicked the unblock on his IP block. Maybe we both did it at the same time? --~ TK MyTalk 08:21, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge

As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --BenjaminS 23:59, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Pledge...

I have proudly posted a version of the "Pledge" on my user page, that I can acccept. It includes the Admin guidelines Andy approved, and does not ignore them. --~ TK MyTalk 07:47, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Chess edit

Nice edit about chess, Elamdri!--Aschlafly 00:50, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

That chess experience will serve you very well if you go into law!--Aschlafly 00:57, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Saddam

The article is less than sub-par. You don't like the stub? --~ TK MyTalk 09:30, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

  • Sorry, but we have been placing them on the talk page, I guess per Andy, so as not to clutter the pages. Really.I don't know much about templates. Are they catagorized and in one place like people did with the user boxes?? --~ TK MyTalk 16:11, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

If I had the technical ability I would, dude. Pretty hard to learn here because no one wants to part with information. Odd people spend so much time with userboxes, and so little with needed items. --~ TK MyTalk 16:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

All of it is here, with links, images, and tables, editing, and the MetaWiki Handbook (at the bottom is a BIG list of helpful links). SIGH, there is your information, it's what I learned from (as well as experience). --Hojimachongtalk 16:44, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks, Hoji! Your experience with learning shouldn't have to be, if people have time to organize so completely the user boxes, they should have time to write a tutorial, or work one-on-one with other users, no? And of course, when people try, trying to gain experience, they are set upon by a wolf pack of nasty users. I wonder if you had that experience? --~ TK MyTalk 16:48, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Oh yes, TK, that was me until I did my first complete overhaul of a Wikipedia article (Seattle). And yes, I understand that users may want some one-on-one time, but I find it's good enough when it's on a case-by-case basis; If they request some help, for example. Now I have to go convince Andy to keep a picture of Muhammad up... sigh... --Hojimachongtalk 16:52, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

User name

This is the new name of User:MountainDew. DanH 17:31, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Happy Birthday, Matt!

Hope you've enjoyed the day! --~ TK MyTalk 21:02, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

TY :)--Elamdri 21:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Happy Birthday! And - for your birthday - I have typed out a customized birthday song just for you:
Happy Birthday to you.
Happy Birthday to you.
Happy Birthday dear Elamdri.
Happy Birthday to you.
Yes, yes it did take a lot of work and creativity. :) --<<-David R->> 21:44, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Haha, Thanks Dave!

Memes

No Internet memes? How dare you not want Conservapedia to break down into an Encyclopedia Dramatica? DanH 03:25, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

No need to apologize

Don't worry about it. Nobody likes a vandal, but we need to be careful to use class when dealing with these people. Thanks for blocking him! --Thammersmith 14:14, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

"Heretical Editing"?

Hi, Gulik here. What exactly did I write that inspired you to drop the banhammer? --Gulik2 22:44, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

My apologies. I've got to remember that this site is Serious Business. (What's the wikicode for sarcasm? I can never remember, and the help doesn't say.) Semi-seriously, has it occurred to you editors that banning anyone who fails to exorcise every ounce of humor from their work and bulk-deletions might NOT be the best way to make a site that will one day rival Wikipedia? --Gulik2 02:21, 25 April 2007 (EDT) Edit to add: And I know enough history to know that my listing for "Heretic" was, sadly, just about 100% accurate. Ask an Albigensian some time if you don't believe me.

LOL

LOL, to this. However, it's a bit inappropriate (or at least Andy would think so, and that's what matters), so you might want to consider apologizing/removing the comment. --Hojimachongtalk 23:42, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Meme

I didn't even look at the wikipedia entry, not really sure how I am copying it. When defining a term in two or three sentences most of the relevant information will be shared. Dawkins as the source, 1976, the reference to gene, cultural information, ect. But I can look. Tmtoulouse 23:51, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

I tried, but I think they are fairly different. But I don't know. Tmtoulouse 23:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Favor

Instead of me writing the word "Essay", I would like any sysop to do the moving for me because then it creates the "Redirect" page automatically and I can still use Wiki format in articles without bothering with the "Essay" thing in linking to articles. Is this alright? I will just notify you when I would like that done. WHEELER 18:47, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Have a question. If I need a bio of somebody like Erik von Kuenhelt Leddihn, can I transport that from Wikipedia? I started the article at Wikipedia, made a lot of edits and a lot of other people have too. Can I transport that here and attribute that back to Wikipedia. Your policy page is not very clear. Is it absolute or is it that you don't want that liberal bias over here?
Second, can you make Philosophy of mixed government an essay, please.
And I would like to upload my photo at Wikinfo from there to here. How does one go about doing this. It says to contact a sysops.WHEELER 19:11, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
Here is the link to the image I would like uploaded. Are you a sysop? http://www.internet-encyclopedia.org/index.php/Image:Wheeler.jpg WHEELER 19:18, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

I will handle this, comrade Elamdri. Bohdan 19:19, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

God the father

God the father was in the list of "Conservapedia:Articles That Need To Be Created" till half an hour ego.

There are important details to present in this new entry. Thank you for your interest.

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:50, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Go ahead.

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:54, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

As it is fine for you, "merge tag" should be removed. Don't you think?

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:55, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Thank you!

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:58, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Re:help

Yeah. I deleted and protected the page he was making. he is one persistant guy though. I'll be on the watch for him. Bohdan 23:02, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

The Halifax troll is nothing more than a loser, and he shows it. Karajou 23:09, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
  • I'm begining to think this guy is a total moron. Bohdan 23:57, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
He really is persistant. I have to go. Have fun with him! Bohdan 00:01, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

WoW

Quote: ""World of Warcraft": Needs to be fixed" - can you fix it so it has better graphics and doesn't require a monthly subscription? :P File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:42, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

HAHAHA, I don't mind the graphics. They COULD make it cheaper though.--Elamdri 18:42, 24 June 2007 (EDT)


LOVE IT!

Your user box on Clinton, I LOVE IT! And I have to agree with you on it. But, the thingis, you weren't old enough to vote those two times!!! =p haha, but we all get the point. Keep fighting the good fight! Jros83 03:34, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Block

I think blocking Arsonist might have been a mistake. His edit to tony blair was good. You might want to look it over. Bohdan 18:21, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia on the Daily Show!!

You are great. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:27, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

World of Warcraft

I am new to Conservapedia, and was wondering, why is World of Warcraft locked?

It has little content and I'd be happy to expand.

Would you please categorize...

... the article for Eric Cartman(South Park)? As the protecting sysop I figured you'd want a crack at it. I suggest "animation," although that will be a new category. I don't know of another one that fits, and I can envision other articles that would fit that category in the future. That said, as an admin here it's your call. Regards, Aziraphale 12:40, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

categorizing articles

Hi! :)

Thanks for adding a new article. Please, though, categorize your articles when you create them; while there are those of us who will go through and clean-up the uncategorized articles, you know your subject better than we do.

For a list of categories, go here: Special:Categories. To add a category to your article, type two open brackets, then "category:" followed by the category you want. Just add two closed brackets and you're done! You can add as many categories as you feel are appropriate. Thanks! Aziraphale 11:44, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

Page protection of Gay

Please can you unprotect Gay? (I checked the log and saw you protected it some time ago.) I want to substantially rewrite it (at the moment it's a stub, very one-sided, and entirely lacking in sources). Alternatively, if you're concerned about vandalism, I can draft a new version in my userspace and you can then copy it into the article. Walton One 19:26, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

Please unprotect Rape

Their is a horrible sentence in there about "seducing" a child - you cannot seduce (which implies an element of consent) a child - this needs rewording. Thankyou. DefenderofTrue 20:48, 11 August 2008 (EDT)

Featured Page

Hey! Congratulations on getting a weekly feautured page. AddisonDM 12:49, 19 January 2009 (EST)


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Elamdri"
Personal tools