User talk:Everwill

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

You're back! I'm not sure that you got this last time...


Hello, Everwill, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Everwill!

Philip J. Rayment 07:22, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Let me know if you want your previous user page and talk page contents reinstated. Philip J. Rayment 07:22, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Dungeons and Dragons

You make a lot of good points, but try not to be so confrontational. Sometimes harsh language draws the wrong crowd and then your point just gets lost and ignored. HelpJazz 11:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)

The problem is Jinxmchu is an aggressive editor quick to revert and his position is so far divorced from reality as to not merit any level of discussion. His positions are so utterly baseless as to make me wonder if he is a plant who is trying to undermine the credibility of Conservapedia by staking out the wackiest "conservative" position possible. Everwill 12:30, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Believe me, I agree, and you have remained civil (for which I applaud you). I'm just letting you know that once you go that one step too far, it won't matter how good your arguments are or how bad his are. Fight the good fight though :) HelpJazz 13:16, 6 March 2008 (EST)
And if you need help, just drop me a line - either on my talk page or by email. --Ed Poor Talk 10:10, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Age of the earth

Two points:

  1. Better to discuss this as one of our Debate Topics, rather than at talk:Geology
  2. Avoid personal remarks such as brazen display of arrogance

Just some friendly advice from your favorite admin. :-) --Ed Poor Talk 07:34, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm not trying to launch attacks or be personal in the least. I just can't find any other words to explain my position. With regards to the arrogance, I'm not sure how to better describe the fact that I don't accept a certain person on Wikipedia as my personal guide to Biblical interpretation and further I would never impose my Biblical interpretation upon another person.

I'm at a loss for what to do, because quite frankly I can't even see a debate in this case. I only see right and wrong. How do you deal with someone politely, when you think they are just flat-out wrong? Everwill 07:41, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

If you can't avoid name-calling, don't deal with them at all? ;-) --Ed Poor Talk 07:46, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Edit conflicts

Please, for the convenience of the server and of everyone who talks to you, try to explain yourself in one edit, especially if you're in the middle of a conversation. Otherwise, whoever you're talking to has to go through and try to awkwardly reinsert what they put in the first time because you felt the need to add in an extra space. Thank you. DannyRedful 10:57, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for your advice. Everwill 11:03, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

Personal tools