User talk:Fox

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Friendly question for you

Do you think "unconverted Jews" is more offensive than calling someone a Nazi? I ask because I don't. In my mind, calling someone the name of a group that was responsible for the mass slaughter of millions of men, women and children in death camps is possibly the most offensive slur someone can use. Far, far worse than any ethnic, religious or racial slur. From what I can judge right now, that doesn't seem to be the case with you. Could you please clarify this issue for me so I can understand things better? Sincerest thanks. Jinxmchue 11:49, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

Jason, the two are inextricably connected. You have to ask yourself why people would come up with a phrase like "unconverted Jews". And what these people would "do" with such people. שועל (talk|contribs) 12:14, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
Well, to be quite frank, I think you are imagining motivations that simply aren't there. The early Christians - Jesus' followers, who still considered themselves 100% Jewish - more than likely considered people who rejected Christ to be unconverted Jews. Yet they were the ones who things were done to. They didn't desire to persecute or kill their fellow Jews. Jinxmchue 13:11, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, well too bad that often when Christians would come to try to convert Jews they would do it with the crucifix in one hand and the sword in the other... ---user:DLerner--- 20:08, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

In response to the block I didn't even notice

I was eating dinner. Try picking an hour that I am in the heat of editing next time. And, if you hadn't noticed. The RW account, Kektklik, has been blocked for 130 or so days. Thank you. And woah! Parodist/mole?! If anything, I was making sure they didn't terribly screw up information about Andy & family. -.- Natebecause I care? 17:20, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

This to you but if others want to read it…good. That rant of mine last year… people were terrified. Some time during April/May of 1940 my mother found herself lying beside one of those straight roads in Belgium, on top of the near-dead British soldier she had been trying to treat, whilst the Luftwafe turned for another pass at them. She was bloody petrified! But it had been her choice….she had joined the TA in 1937 so she would have experience when the inevitable happened. She had volunteered for the BEF. She was there for all the right reasons. She ended up on the beach at Dunkirk, treating the wounded as the dogfights went on overhead and was taken off in the last hospital ship to leave. The vessel next to hers was blown out of the water. All this was 18 months before America joined the fun….and it was nowhere near the last time she would be fired at.

Mum died in 2006. She was 95. In May 2007 I got up the courage to start going through her papers. And a little while later, Andrew Schlafly decided to, in effect, call her, and all like her, a coward.

(You may be interested to know that somewhere in a forest in Israel there is a tree that was planted and dedicated to “Sister Kathleen Evans for her tireless support for the Jewish Community of Sydney over many years.” (Or something like that…I can’t find the bloody thing!) She was a Methodist, but a very ecuminical one) AlanE 20:59, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Requesting that my page be unblocked

My 3 month ban from editing has expired and now I am requesting that you unlock my user page and my user talk page. Thank you. Jose83

I do not have the ability to unlock your page. However, my reply here should flag this to the greater CP community, one of whom will have "the power". שועל (talk|contribs) 17:45, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
Done. Philip J. Rayment

Messianics

I like your work on the MJ article, but note that that you don't seem to have contributed recently? Are you still an editor here? MTaylor 15:01, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

Personal tools