User talk:Humblpi
From Conservapedia
Welcome!
Hello, Humblpi, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide as soon as you can.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page.
Thanks for reading, Humblpi!
Thanks for this rewording at Environmental problems. I had worried that the way I wrote it, sounded more like an essay (or pundit's column) but you restored the encyclopedic tone. --Ed Poor Talk 14:11, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
Contents |
It's on purpose!!
Stop messing with the Brisingr entries. I have purposefully created separate articles for the book and the word. The cause for this is that, when the book is released, I plan to expand the article, writing a summary like I did in Eragon and Eldest. Thanks, ~BCSTalk2ME 12:41, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
- I guess one person's messing is another's improving! I was not "messing", and I will continue to do what I can to improve these and other articles. Humblpi 14:29, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Too much talk
Half your recent contribs are just talk. I gave you a Conservapedia:Writing assignment here. Please get started. --Ed Poor Talk 07:30, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
Animals and humans
Human beings are not animals. Biologists who study the human body are free to make whatever categories they want, but we need not follow their conventions. There is more than one science entirely dedicated to the study of human beings as distinct from animals, e.g. Anthropology.
It is a liberal article of faith that human beings are "simply animals", who happen to be smarter or whatever. We will not censor that idea - in the sense of not letting our readers be aware of it - but I strongly disagree with any support for the idea, as it contradicts Christian ideas.
Better to stand back a bit and take the balanced view which acknoweledegs that materialists and Christians disagree about whether humans are animals. We need not endorse the anti-Conservative POV. --Ed Poor Talk 08:27, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
- If humans are not animals, I think the opening sentence of the article on Animals needs attention, beacuse it certainly shows an equally "anti-Conservative" POV. Humblpi 09:32, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
Vandal
User:MassimoDutti is a very subtle (bordering on talented) vandal, "pioneer of onanism" made me laugh. ---user:DLerner--- 12:18, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the humor
Thanks for the humor in your edit summary, and thanks also for your correction: stared -> starred in Hollywood values.--Aschlafly 08:30, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
