User talk:IndianaJ
From Conservapedia
You've been reverted twice in the last half hour for inappropriate edits. If your editing quality does not improve then your account will be blocked.--Aschlafly 20:33, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- What was wrong with them? IndianaJ 20:34, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Hmm...parodist much? --transResident Transfanform! 14:54, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm offended by your accusations! My works are in line with the rest of this website! IndianaJ 14:56, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Funny—I don't remember anyone else one the site stating that only "pedophiles and sociopaths" read books. Also, I read books, and I'm certainly not a pedophile/sociopath. --transResident Transfanform! 15:00, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I said "sociopaths, school shooters and pedophiles." IndianaJ 15:03, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Again, as far as I can tell, no one else at this site has views like that concerning books, and I certainly do not fall into any of those three categories. --transResident Transfanform! 15:04, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- That's only because they fear persecution by the Liberal Elite like yourself. IndianaJ 15:05, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm a part of the "Liberal Elite"? That's news to me. --transResident Transfanform! 15:07, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Clearly, as you're attempting to censor me. You've shown several instances of Liberal style here, and you're clueless. IndianaJ 15:11, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Objecting to what you're saying is not the same as trying to censor you. --transResident Transfanform! 15:13, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I don't like being called a paedophile, and sadly that now means I don't like you. Please desist from deceitful, parody entries. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 15:13, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- See? Do you see the violence inherent in the system? Come see the violence inherent in the system!
- There's a 94.569863342% chance you also believe in censoring classroom prayer. IndianaJ 15:16, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you for confirming that you are a parodist. --transResident Transfanform! 15:18, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Did it take you that long? Did you see the numerous references to heroin? The fact that you needed me to reference Monty Python to confirm that most-- MOST-- of my work was parody says volumes about the quality of this place! IndianaJ 15:20, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you for confirming that you are a parodist. --transResident Transfanform! 15:18, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I don't like being called a paedophile, and sadly that now means I don't like you. Please desist from deceitful, parody entries. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 15:13, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Objecting to what you're saying is not the same as trying to censor you. --transResident Transfanform! 15:13, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Clearly, as you're attempting to censor me. You've shown several instances of Liberal style here, and you're clueless. IndianaJ 15:11, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm a part of the "Liberal Elite"? That's news to me. --transResident Transfanform! 15:07, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- That's only because they fear persecution by the Liberal Elite like yourself. IndianaJ 15:05, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Again, as far as I can tell, no one else at this site has views like that concerning books, and I certainly do not fall into any of those three categories. --transResident Transfanform! 15:04, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I said "sociopaths, school shooters and pedophiles." IndianaJ 15:03, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Funny—I don't remember anyone else one the site stating that only "pedophiles and sociopaths" read books. Also, I read books, and I'm certainly not a pedophile/sociopath. --transResident Transfanform! 15:00, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
Insults have no place here
Comments like the following are out of place here:
- you're clueless [1]
Please review Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks. --Ed Poor Talk 15:30, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
