User talk:JBrandonLoberg

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

While CP excepts liberal editors, your edits are questionable.-- 50 star flag.png jp 17:54, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Conservapedia is not in business to exalt anarchism. Be warned. Bugler 06:14, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
I didn't see anything all that bad with it. In the future, it's best to make several small edits and put a descriptive edit comment in each one. Otherwise the entire edit will be reverted, since most people are too lazy to revert just the offending part. HelpJazz 12:47, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Bugler, what exactly did you feel was 'exalting' anarchism? JBrandonLoberg 22:25, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
What makes you think i'm a "liberal editor," and for what reason are my edits continually reverted? The introductory paragraph of an encyclopedic article should explain the topic in general terms, becoming more specific in the following sections. This article starts naming specific issues straight off the bat, and without citations to support them. Frankly, it smacks of bias, which doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Also, i am unclear as to what edits you find questionable...JBrandonLoberg 22:25, 18 September 2008 (EDT)