User talk:Jdellaro

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Jdellaro, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Jdellaro!

Warning: your edits are an excess of talk, insubstantive edits, and edits that have to be cleaned up. Your account is on the verge of being blocked for these reasons. For example, your edit to Richard Sternberg was unsubstantiated and misleading.--Aschlafly 08:44, 26 January 2008 (EST)
I disagree. While I make small edits here and there, mainly to cleanup, I don't believe that the majority of my edits need to be cleaned up. As to your instance, the Sternberg edit wasn't unsubstantiated. In fact, my edit was practically a direct quote from the reference provided by the previous edit. I had written, " The journal has, though, stated that the paper was published without review by any associate editor, and would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of The Proceeding." The fourth reference currently on the article states, "Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process. The Council, which includes officers, elected councilors, and past presidents, and the associate editors would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of the Proceedings..." How is what I stated either unsubstantiated or misleading when I just provided a summary of the referenced Council Statement?--Jdellaro 08:51, 26 January 2008 (EST)
It's obvious how your statement was misleading, and I'm not going to waste time on this. You said, probably with liberal motivation, "The journal ... would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of The Proceeding." In fact, under pressure by evolutionists and only after the pressure was applied, merely said that the 'Council' would have deemed the paper inappropriate." The Council's opinion, if there is even such a thing, is meaningless. Perhaps the Council could have voted to withdraw the paper. It didn't.--Aschlafly 09:01, 26 January 2008 (EST)
I apologize, I didn't mean the statement to be misleading, despite being a liberal. It was my impression, having read the article referenced, that The Council has editorial control over the journal. Hence by combining the two parts, it was meant to be a summation rather than a direct quote, and it was done without intentional deception. I stand by your decision regarding the edit, as it's your website, and it's a well-reasoned change.--Jdellaro 09:12, 26 January 2008 (EST)


Nice Job

Nice job on the draft article! I've done a few myself and I know they can be frustrating!--IDuan 14:25, 26 January 2008 (EST)

Saw your "Ugh" comment when you were doing the last one, so I figured I'd pitch in and toss one up there while I'm sitting around.--Jdellaro 14:33, 26 January 2008 (EST)


Unless you start contributing substantive material of merit, your account is going to be blocked.--Aschlafly 11:54, 27 January 2008 (EST)

The NFL drafts were no good?--Jdellaro 12:18, 27 January 2008 (EST)


Would you please enable inter-user e-mail? Thanks :). --MakeTomorrow 12:42, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Sorry, I don't know how :-) --Jdellaro 12:48, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Bus crash warning

No Jdellaro, you follow me: her immigration status is an issue now, and it is you and Sawneybeane who have whinned about that story's presence here. And this is your last warning. Either you be constructive in how you deal with any of us in this site, or anything that is posted here, or you're out. Karajou 13:55, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Karajou is right on with his comments on the talk page and above. Your comments are typical of liberals defending behavior by illegals. I really want you to stay on the site so I can see more of your liberal behavior, but you're pushing the limits of my tolerance. --Crocoite 00:03, 24 February 2008 (EST)
It's only because everyone refuses to state the obvious---the fact that she was an illegal is what causes you to report it on the FP. Karajou's comment, "Tell it to the families of the children FIRST" is absolutely and completely overboard. If the driver wasn't an illegal, would CP have posted it on the FP? I still haven't seen anyone from this site who can truthfully say it would be. The drive of the story should be the tragedy of children dying in a bus crash. Instead CP uses the story to highlight illegal immigration. That's just beyond the pale to me. But perhaps my worrying more about children dying in a bus crash than whether the other driver was illegal or not is just due to the liberal emotion---caring.--Jdellaro 10:23, 24 February 2008 (EST)
I'm the one that posted that article to the FP and the fact that she was an illegal is exactly why it's on the FP. You will continue to see stories about how illegals are damaging this country. --Crocoite 10:29, 24 February 2008 (EST)

So kids being killed in a school bus crash is not CP-newsworthy, UNLESS an illegal immigrant was involved?--Jdellaro 10:45, 24 February 2008 (EST)
That is correct. The other news organizations will report on regular school bus crashes. CP will report news (not just school bus crashes) where illegals are damaging this country. --Crocoite 10:52, 24 February 2008 (EST)

Nice distinction

Thank you for improving the wording of Barack on rifles here. --Ed Poor Talk 14:42, 1 March 2008 (EST)

Personal tools