User talk:Karajou

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Would you please add the fact that Trump won Maine's second congressional district to File:2016 US Electoral College Polling Map.png? Also, it's quite clear that Trump won Michigan, so would you please shade it completely red? --1990'sguy (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2016 (EST)

Also, the popular vote totals will need to be updated, even though the official results will not be released until December, most likely. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2016 (EST)
I'll get that done tomorrow. Are there any counts released of legal vs illegal votes? Karajou (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2016 (EST)
Over 3 million votes, it has been reported [1][2]. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2016 (EST)

Visibility request

Would you please change the visibility for this obscene edit? --1990'sguy (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (EST)

Your PZ Myers cartoon

Have you read the article Atheism and humor? Now you know why your PZ Myers cartoon was not well-received by certain atheists. :) Conservative (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2016 (EST)

First law of thermodynamics page

Please could you change the differentials from exact to inexact on the First Law of Thermodynamics page? PeterIceHockey (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2016 (EST)

Systematic English

Would you please delete the article Systematic English? Not to demean the article writer, but this article is of extremely poor quality. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2016 (EST)

Merry Christmas


Merry Christmas! And have a happy New Year's Day. Conservative (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)

Blocking account (without

Dear Karajou,

I Don't know why the account User:MrOakTree was blocked infinite, Spamming of external links to external links was the Reason, i have created a page about Mark Rutte with afding a link about his career on a Dutch website because sources is required.that's All , i did never vandalized One page, I created this account because you blocked the e mail also, you can block this also , Buf this was my question Master of Road (talk) 14:45, 4 January 2017 (EST)

Two requests

Hello Karajou,

--1990'sguy (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Thank you for unblocking Abortion. I have made my edits to that page. Because there is a high risk of vandalism on that article, would you please protect that article again? --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Speedy deletion candidates

Could you please delete the articles from the Category:Speedy deletion candidates? I don't have the permission to do it by myself, because the articles have a large edit history, over 3 revisions.--JoeyJ (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2017 (EST)

I apologize

The gods may throw a dice
Their minds as cold as ice
And someone way down here
Loses someone dear
The winner takes it all
The loser has to fall
It's simple and it's plain
Why should I complain?

I apologize
If it makes you feel bad
Seeing me so tense
No self-confidence.

Hey, even TR supported the notion of sterilizing some of God-RNG's children.[3]. God-RNG loves you. I promise.--Amorrow (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2017 (EST)


Hey, guy. I am Chemical Engineer from the oldest technology university in the Western Hemisphere. I understand the spiritual significance of entropy, I dunno, maybe I am in the top 1000 people on Earth who do. I dunno. Take some dramamine or something. Love ya.--Amorrow (talk) 12:26, 18 February 2017 (EST)

That is not an issue

  • With due respect, I do not bother if you deleted all three articles created by me per your neutrality. I hope, you did not demonstrate as a Wiki-admin. The Muslim United Nations is not a fake organisation as you follow the way of Wiki conspiracy, which is runs by secret agencies of that part of the world. I joined the Conservapedia for its credibility that differs from Wikipedia, I hope I am not mistaken about it. May I request you to restore the articles so that I can rewrite that as soon as possible, to satisfy you that have not the copyright issues, nor fake issues. Thanks. JusticeOfJustice (talk) 07:42, 25 February 2017 (EST)
No. Karajou (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Uncategorized files

We have a bit of an epidemic on our hands--there are a lot of uncatagorized files which are protected, so they cannot be taken care of. If you get a chance, is there a way you could un-protect at least a small bock so we can categorize them? I know it can be done one at a time, but can you do it in batch?
I have protect privileges (which don't work) but no unprotect privileges. Thank you! --David B (TALK) 20:13, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Madarasz's tiger parrot

Just wanted to thank you for your improvement to the article, Madarasz's tiger parrot.--IluvAviation (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Admin action request

Would you please hide this threatening edit? [4] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Impressive that you've earned a death threat from those fine, "tolerant" folks. I think I've only been sworn at. I'd say a hide is in order, but keep up the good work of frustrating vandals and trolls, 1990'sguy! --David B (TALK) 00:06, 4 March 2017 (EST)
He's just a little man; his threats revealed he's not even military, let alone a SEAL. Just some liberal whiner hanging out in his room all day, soiling his Fruit-of-the-Looms! Karajou (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2017 (EST)
I think Donald Trump's election, Trumpian news on the main page and my atheism content related edits, may have caused someone to fly into a rage.
The secular leftists are beginning to act like rats in a corner as I mentioned recently on the main page talk page. Others are turning to therapy (see: Report: Atheist Millennials Trade Faith for Therapy). Conservative (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2017 (EST)
Yes, that guy's words do show that he's not a Navy SEAL. They have too much honor to do stupid things like ranting and vandalizing CP. Still, I've never received a death threat in my life prior to this. Having a conservative like Trump in the White House really is revealing. It has shown which Republicans are actually conservative and which ones prefer leftist policies, and it has made clearer than ever how "tolerant" leftists are (even though it was quite clear to me before). --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2017 (EST)


Is there any way you could fix Template:Book so I can use it? The template is at the least not user-friendly. --1990'sguy (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (EST)

European range blocks

a /16 represents 64,000 ips. With the French elections in April, and German in September, and the fact European populist movements are thirsting for information because the mainstream media is demonizing them, and CP needs European editors to aprise us of actual facts versus our American fake news media, perhaps we should rethink the duration of such an extensive range block.

Obviously this trolling from Europe is targeted at shutting down Europeans access to information at a crucial time voters are deciding on the future of their sovereignty in the face of millions of Islamic hordes overruning Europe at the behest of EU elitists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 15:25, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

Agreed. I did that only to European data servers for no more than six months; I'll reduce it. Karajou (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Thanks. This'll be ongoing til the German elections in September. And the censorship and smearing over there is outrageous, worse than the US. Let's keep CP a breath of fresh air for European populists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 22:30, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Yes, and for the record, I strongly agree with RobS that we need to make this site as accessible as possible to European viewers, especially considering what's happening on the continent. Our elections are over for now, but theirs are taking place. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
What I'll do in the future is block specific IPs, without the range, and only if it's a persistant problem with a troll. Karajou (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Or shorten the range and duration of the block. I'd suggest try 24 hrs on a range; if that doesn't work, 36, 48, 72 and so on until you find on optimum duration that isn't a burden on yourself. And where hopefully the duration between abusive incidents is longer than a block. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 23:40, 25 March 2017 (EDT)


After some discussion (on my talk page and Andy's) it has been decided that I start an Internet Relay Chat channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know!
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --David B (TALK) 15:34, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

Block of Thekohser

Karajou, I'm reaching out to you to discuss why my User account here was blocked for "Trolling" in January 2016. I don't recall ever trolling this website, and I'm not even sure I had any edits to this site at the time of the block. I had a conversation this morning with the owner/founder of Conservapedia, and he quickly unblocked my account. I'm just curious what happened here, not trying to "poke" you. - Thekohser (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

I checked the logs for that time; I didn't block you at all. Karajou (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
That's weird, because when I tried to edit from that account name, the "notice" that came up for me clearly indicated that you had blocked the account. Maybe it's a system-admin default, or something? Are you like a "Steward" or "Bureaucrat" on Conservapedia, or does your name "auto-fill" on some forms with outdated contacts? Regardless, it's not that important. The record seems to show that a User:TK blocked my account within one day of me registering here -- unless that was a false-flag account that one of my detractors opened here to sabotage my reputation. Not surprisingly, in the following calendar year, TK was himself blocked from participation on Conservapedia. I seem to attract the attention of erratic individuals who have trouble conforming to rules. - Thekohser (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
It was possibly a false-flag, as you said. TK was the only individual involved in the original block, and that was several years ago. Karajou (talk) 11:52, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Karajou, this guy might be able to help us update the Wikipedia#Scandals_and_decline page, he made the chart on that page. Or even the Bias in WP page. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 12:07, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Just saw it; totally agree. Karajou (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

Hey there

Now, Karajou, let me first freely tell you that this account is a sock of Koidevelopment. That being said, don't block me on the sockery alone. I apologise for it, but I can't edit under my rightful account. Next, before you block because I'm Koidevelopment, I ask that you give me a chance and block if I deserve it, not because I'm me. Deserving it does not mean a different point of view on a subject. Deserving it does not mean that you don't personally like me. Deserving it means that I get blocked because I vandalise or blank pages or am hateful or I dox or something along those lines. Let me say it once and for all: I will never do any of those things, nor will I give you a reason to block me. I do think we could be friends. Let me stay, and let me simply edit articles that we have mutual dislike of. I don't like Islam and you don't like Islam, so let me stay to edit Islam. I know a bit about it (enough to improve it). You don't like Buddhism and I don't like Buddhism, so let me stay to edit it. See how this could be fun for both of us? I promise that I'll never edit a Christianity related article. Hold me to that promise. I actually do want to help you guys. Oh, and that Xiang Qi article? That was a legitimate one. It's quite a fun game, actually. You should try it. All the best, Li Wumei (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (EDT)

I'll even use American spelling when I edit, to sweeten the deal. Li Wumei (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Fair enough. I unblocked the Koidevelopment account if you want to use it again. Just be honest and factual in your edits. Karajou (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Look at thaatt. I do think this'll work. If I make a mistake, feel free to roll it back or fix it. Parrrley 12:22, 4 May 2017 (EDT)


Thank you for addressing the Philadelphia ambiguity. As an admin, I know that you have "page move powers". What I suggest is that you temporarily save the current Philadelphia page offline, delete the last two changes on Philadelphia to restore it to the state that it was in before you started the project, then move Philadelphia to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This will take the history with the text. Then recreate the Philadelphia article and paste in the saved text. We need to work to keep the history (which gets lost when you just copy and paste the text into an article.) Many thanks for all that you do for Conservapedia. JDano (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Already done :) Karajou (talk) 09:48, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Locking a template

Hey, if I'm not mistaken, you have the ability to lock pages. I'd like to ask you to lock this template:

The template is complete, so I would propose locking it to avoid any vandalism that may come about in the future.Korvex (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Thanks for locking it, just noticed. Regards, Korvex (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Move requests

Would you please move Presidential Election 2012 and Presidential Election 2016 to United States presidential election, 2012 and United States presidential election, 2016, respectively? (you will need to delete the latter redirect to do so).

Andy prefers the current titles, but every other of the 56-or-so presidential election articles have the title of "United States presidential election, XXXX", so we need to be consistent in our article naming conventions. Of course, it would be great if we could find someone who is able and willing to move the 56-or-so other articles, but until that happens, we need to move these two for consistency. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Done. Karajou (talk) 09:44, 14 May 2017 (EDT)
I noticed that Andy responded to my concerns about these issues before I asked you -- I didn't see them until today. I still personally prefer consistency, but I submit his response for your consideration regardless. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

Page protect

Ought to just slap page protect on some of these targets. RobSTrump now is fighting back against the coup plotters 14:31, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Disgusting vandal

Would you please delete the edits of this vandal. This appears to be the same guy who posted that death threat on my talk page (and he did it again today). What he wrote in every article he edited this time is blatantly disgusting. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

I wouldn't be concerned about this little clown at all. What he did was to show off exactly what we've been saying about liberals for years, and the more people find out about it, the better. Karajou (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2017 (EDT)
I assume that I also shouldn't be concerned about the crazy man who seemingly has it out on me now? --Anglican (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
Report it to James Comey at the FBI. He's a man of unquestioned integrity who surely will nail the badguys. RobSLock Up The Coup Plotters! 13:49, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
That might by tricky, Rob. Somehow his office is hard to find now. Seriously, though, I don't want to sound callous, but don't take it personally. I think we all have gotten threats, insults, etc. 1990'sguy has recently been the recipient of a death threat (the same one twice, actually), and admins are regularly ridiculed. When he comes around, we'll deal with him. Unfortunately, tunneling network connections has become incredibly easy, so fools like him don't need to understand how it works, they just click a button and become instantly able to access the site under a different IP. He'll run out of IPs and interest eventually, like they all do. Of course, talking about him just validates his efforts and probably encourages him. I suppose that can't be helped. --David B (TALK) 14:29, 17 May 2017 (EDT)