User talk:Ninj4
From Conservapedia
--<<-David R->> 19:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)- 1. They do not violate the commandments.
- 2. You are just upset because it makes YOU personally show up in a bad light.
- So how about cleaning up your act before starting yelling at people for telling the truth? Ninj4 19:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
You did not back them up with any citation. They are your mere opinions. The warning stands. --<<-David R->> 19:53, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- I fail to see the other entries backed up by citations either. In fact, I could just sum up as you being a person with a penchant for hypocrisy who blatantly ignores the 1st Amendment... oh, wait, wow. Whodathunk? Ninj4 20:09, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, you continue to harp on the 1st amendment. But opinions are for the talk page; facts are for the article. If you feel it is necessary to place a citation needed, code: {{fact}}, then be my guest. --<<-David R->> 20:11, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, touché. Unfortunately, nobody else has had their points removed in a similiar fashion, so that "hypocrisy" part still stands. Better luck trying to justify your bias next time. Ninj4 20:13, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
yes i aggre with him i think this site is controlling
