User talk:Rebiu

From Conservapedia

It's Phill Kline, not Phil Kline. MountainDew 14:30, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Contents 1 Please respond, if you simply delete things it looks like you're hiding them. 2 Are you sure you've got the right man? 3 Do you ever look at your talk page? 4 ?

Please respond, if you simply delete things it looks like you're hiding them.

I see that you have removed the offending comment from my User Page. I note with some surprise that you have also removed my comment from your talk page. Editing talk pages in this way is not considered good practice. I have reinserted my previous comment below and still await your apology.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:00, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Are you sure you've got the right man?

You have put the most remarkable statement on my user page. It reads: "Seems that you really want to sabotage this site with personal attacks on editors of the debate pagesRebiu 16:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT)". I don't think that I've ever put a personal attack on any debate page if I have tell me where it is and I'll do something about it. Otherwise I'd be obliged if you removed your comment with an apology.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 16:24, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm a witness. -- Cracker_talk 17:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Thank you Mr Pommer. He's removed the offending comment, but now seems disinclined to respond to questions about the matter.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:08, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Do you ever look at your talk page?

I note that I am still waiting for an apology for the attack you made on me and then apparently tried to hide.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

You requested that I delete the comment then apologize. What is the point in deleting it if I must then reiterate so that the apology is understandable? How can anything be hidden when every page has a history? Please be clear about what you want or quite wasting my time with your whining.Rebiu 10:46, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

If you fight fire with fire, both parties will be burned. Try to tone down your rhetoric, please.

If you need help, you can contact me. I'm a big advocate of Conservapedia:Civility. --Ed Poor 11:29, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

I agree completely sir. I have extended a hand of friendship to Bill M. Wait a minute, how come you are marking up my Usertalk page with these condescension’s and admonishments and you say nothing on his? You come here talking about civility and pretend to not be taking sides and you pull this routine. You call that civility?Rebiu 11:51, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for your apology.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 12:33, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

I found when teaching Sunday School that it was usually more effective to admonish only one party to a quarrel. If it turns out that the admonished one is more mature than the other, this will come out in later exchanges. --Ed Poor 12:42, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Oh, I see so you are saying I am only as mature as a Sunday school. I suppose Condescension, smugness, and insults are what work for you there. Well I am finished with you Ed so if you could stop trashing my userpage we could get back to making conservapedia the best online resource, for the conservative point of view, there is.Rebiu 15:25, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

<chuckle> You missed the implied compliment and went for the (supposed) veiled insult instead? --Ed Poor 15:38, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

I Said Good Day Sir!!!Rebiu 21:21, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

 ?

A fact? Care to back that up? --Hojimachong^talk 00:24, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

The proof is Conservapeda itselfRebiu 14:45, 9 April 2007 (EDT)