User talk:TK/TKarchive11

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search


For long?

Good to see you around Terry. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 07:58, 15 November 2008 (EST)

  • Joaquín! I was just about to email you, as I could not post on your page. To hear from both you and Ed within minutes, was the nicest welcome I could get! --₮K/Talk 08:05, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • -D Geo...thanks! Never see you online anymore. :-( - --₮K/Talk 14:18, 15 November 2008 (EST)

Hi Terry! --DeanStalk 21:27, 15 November 2008 (EST)

Apparently I have magic powers - I was just asking who I should go to with category questions since you weren't around... and poof! here you are. *takes a bow* Aziraphale 15:30, 15 November 2008 (EST) <-sig for old time's sake...

Hello TK. according to certain people we are one and the same, so it's especially good to meet you. Bugler 18:16, 16 November 2008 (EST)

  • ROFL! Your IP's are the UK. Mine, Reno, Nevada, U.S.A. Let "them" check on that!  :P --₮K/Talk 18:33, 16 November 2008 (EST)


Dude, you can't really believe Obama is Muslim right? His kids are baptized. BTW I am strongly conservative. Nig89 20:29, 15 November 2008 (EST)

  • I think Andy or someone posted to this, no? And not doubting you, but if I had a Benjamin for everyone who said they were conservative, but spent most of their time trying to make liberals look better, I would have a pile of about $10,000.  :P There is lots to do here, refrain from making edits on idealogy, and leave it to Andy and the Sysops to thrash out the politics. I think Andy has posted to the talk page there, just moments ago, BTW. And Baptized by whom? Wright? -- --₮K/Talk 20:37, 15 November 2008 (EST)


hi, added a talk page item about coca-cola and mucked up the format, sorry. I thought it might be an interesting pop culture type item Markr 20:30, 16 November 2008 (EST)

It's not your fault; the {{controversial}} template needs fixin'. -CSGuy 20:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)

Kurt Vonnegut

Does the Kurt Vonnegut page still need to be locked? It's been a year. ArnoldFriend 21:57, 17 November 2008 (EST)


Main Stream Media: "Leave Barack alone!"

I uploaded this for you. --Ed Poor Talk 09:22, 19 November 2008 (EST)

I forgot, what caused those people to burst out crying on the internet?---- 50 star flag.png PhilipV I Support our Troops! 08:10, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Your disappearing welcome

Somebody wiped out the welcome you had left on my talk page. Do you know who or why? BigMike 13:35, 20 November 2008 (EST)

  • It didn't even show anything in the page log! Well, I put it back. You could always go through the deletion logs.....but that is tedious. Lots of wiki glitches, so I have no idea. --₮K/Talk 14:09, 20 November 2008 (EST)


Seen you here like in the old days makes me happy. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 07:28, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Thank you, Joaquín! Email me and catch me up on your life. I hope you are well and doing fine. --₮K/Talk 07:32, 26 November 2008 (EST)


Hi TK, I am new to this project, but am very interested in liberal rhetoric. I was wondering, since you see to be at least as interested in rhetoric, if you would be willing to join me on making a few pages. My first so far is the War on Christmas page, but I'd like to create others, time permitting. I'd also like someone to bounce ideas off of, if you're interested. If not, no worries, I just thought you were someone who might share my affinity for persuasive speaking. Respectfully, BradJohnson 10:48, 26 November 2008 (EST)

  • That would be fantastic, Brad! You might want to take a look here Liberal_revisionists and add what you can. Email me through the link to the left, and we can email ideas, etc. --₮K/Talk 17:00, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Re: Please, the addition of whole paragraphs should not be marked as "minor"

Sorry about that, I had been making minor adjustments to other pages before that and did it without thinking. My mistake. AGrath 16:24, 29 November 2008 (EST)

  • Not a problem, but here some take that as a sign of something nefarious afoot, so I wanted to save you that. ;-) --₮K/Talk 16:26, 29 November 2008 (EST)
  • Thanks! :) AGrath 16:29, 29 November 2008 (EST)
  • And thank you yet again for the image uploads! I'm very grateful! AGrath 19:07, 29 November 2008 (EST)


Congratulations! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 17:28, 1 December 2008 (EST)

  • Surprise.thumbnail.gif And it's not April Fools Day?

Thanks, Joaquín! Thanks especially to Andy! --₮K/Talk 18:33, 1 December 2008 (EST)

How about been part of the team for "Featured articles"? I am sure the other members of the committee will be glad. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 20:06, 1 December 2008 (EST)
This is something I know nothing about. Link? --₮K/Talk 20:40, 1 December 2008 (EST)
here Geoff PlourdeComplain! 20:49, 1 December 2008 (EST)
Joaquín, Geo, I would be honored to join such a distinguished committee that includes those of you already there! Thanks! --₮K/Talk 21:08, 1 December 2008 (EST)


I didn't know where to put a project. Thanks for the help. JY23 19:09, 3 December 2008 (EST)

No problem! I had to think about it for a moment, but Professor Poor added something to that one, so I did the same. --₮K/Talk 19:20, 3 December 2008 (EST)

Politics of global warming

I don't care about the content of it, I'm attempting to fix the grammar. I just want the first sentence to read "The politics of global warming are" instead of the "The politics of global warming is." Politics is a plural noun, and should be followed with "are" as opposed to "is." Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:00, 4 December 2008 (EST)

  • False flag. Someone kept changing the composition of the groups. If that was not you, then we don't have a disagreement. --₮K/Talk 20:05, 4 December 2008 (EST)
Well it may have been, but if I did it was accidental. I was just trying to make it read a bit easier. Sorry for the confusion! Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:07, 4 December 2008 (EST)
There was someone else in there at the same time, check and see. I think three of us were editing at the same moment, lol. --₮K/Talk 20:09, 4 December 2008 (EST)
A metaphorical 3-car pileup? ...or someone trying to pit editor against editor? You decide. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:13, 4 December 2008 (EST)
Well, isn't a big thing. Congestion always tends to increase accident occurrence. Much like not being prepared in an ER will ensure a busier than usual night, and that getting everything ready to receive a half dozen admits will make for a restful night! --₮K/Talk 20:18, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Logo policy

As kind of a side note, what's the site's logo policy? Most company or sports team/league pages are logoless. :( (Joaquin told me to ask you) JY23 19:06, 5 December 2008 (EST)

  • All those things a Lawyer just told me are "free use", and the upload comments should say that. This applies to the teams, major corporations, like GM and such. If you want, just use the email function here, and give me a URL list, and I will upload what you need. --₮K/Talk! 20:09, 5 December 2008 (EST)
I know that the MLS logo and the Seattle Sounders F.C. logo are on the requested images page, I can put the URLs here for convenience, if you wish. JY23 16:42, 6 December 2008 (EST)
That would sure be super! Thanks, JY23..I really appreciate it. --₮K/Talk! 18:47, 6 December 2008 (EST)
Seeing as I can't find that page, here's some URLs I found for the same logos. * -MLS logo

Will be adding more as needed. Thanks for your help. JY23 19:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

I'm sorry, I added both of those. Check my contribs for the pictures. --₮K/Talk! 16:09, 7 December 2008 (EST)

Where? Sorry about all this, I'm still kinda figuring my way around here. Thanks for understanding. JY23 16:13, 7 December 2008 (EST)
  •  ! Sorry, JY23...I uploaded them to my computer, must have gotten distracted, and only thought I uploaded them here. Here they are: . --₮K/Talk! 17:21, 7 December 2008 (EST)

  • Thanks a bunch for uploading those. Here's some more:

Thanks again. Some reading material for you: User:JY23/Sports project. JY23 18:25, 7 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks very much for helping me out, but it appears i have been granted block/upload rights :))))! Thanks again, I'll just upload those now. Well, if only I could figure that out! Especially the part about "Destination file name". What's that supposed to mean, anyway? JY23 18:32, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Destination file name is the name that it will be created as when you upload it. So the file name on your computer may be C:\Documents and Settings\~username\My Documents\My Pictures\~filename.jpg, but the file will be saved as ~destinationfilename.jpg when you upload it. Jallen 18:43, 9 December 2008 (EST)
Oh, thanks! JY23 18:50, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Libertarianism Page

Hello TK. I was wondering why you changed the edit on libertarianism where I fixed the link (on Murray Rothbard) to the Austrian School of Economics back to the broken Austrian School. I believe I left the text so it would still read appropriately. Would it be a problem if I were to change this so the link works again? (I know I could also make a Austrian School redirect, but there may be other fields where there are Austrian Schools that I am unaware of, so I avoided that option). Thank you kindly, Sulli 21:10, 5 December 2008 (EST)

Also, unrelated question. What is "rmv hooey?". Why is it inappropriate to put anarcho-capitalism under category libertarianism? Is the category itself bad or too widely applied? Anarchocapitalist ideas are one of the main types of libertarian thought, unless I am misunderstanding something. Thank you kindly, again. Sulli 21:18, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • "Hooey" the dictionary tells us, has several uses. Informal.–interjection
  • 1.(used to express disapproval or disbelief): "Hooey! You know that's not true."–noun
  • 2. silly or worthless talk, writing, ideas, etc.; nonsense; bunk: "That's a lot of hooey and you know it!"
  • Now given it is an informal term, lots is left up to the user of it. On CP, in the instance you cite, I meant that although it does make up some of the libertarian ideas, technically, to be at an encyclopedia level, that was not the proper category for it. As in Barry Goldwater where I certainly agree several of his views (especially later in life) are indeed correct in being called "libertarian", it is wrong to apply that moniker to Mr. Conservative because more of his views, on really important topics like keeping a standing army, taxation, national defense, etc.,etc. he was mostly a conservative. Applying that category to him would be misleading to those not versant in all things Goldwater, leading them to believe he was mostly a libertarian. If I bungled the edit, please correct it. My intent was to keep from labeling it primarily a libertarian idea. That explain well enough? --₮K/Talk! 22:32, 5 December 2008 (EST)
My main confusion was in regards to what the rmv stands for, although combined with this explanation I realize it almost certainly just means remove. Thank you for your time. Sulli 11:45, 6 December 2008 (EST)


Welcome to Bishop

TK, you welcomed Bishop, but the user already has an infinite block, for username.LowKey 20:43, 9 December 2008 (EST)

  • Wow! Nothing gets past you, does it? Spend more time doing productive edits, and less being Paul Revere, is my suggestion to you. --₮K/Talk! 20:46, 9 December 2008 (EST)
Suggestion noted. I was looking for Bishop's contribs to get a picture of the overall tone, noticed very few edits and so checked the block log. My post to you was merely for information (you were welcoming someone who was already gone), so I am afraid I don't get your "Paul Revere" reference. I edit very little, and a reasonable proportion is what you call "productive edits". I assume you mean main article edits, but building up CP as a whole involves more than just article edits. I apologise if this was some offense to you. As I said, merely information. Shutting up now.LowKey 21:04, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Locked page

Terry, I hope you don't mind, but I have locked this page due to repeated vandalism. --DeanStalk 21:06, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Thank you

Thank you for your support in the face of an extraordinary personal attack. As I said to Rod, it means a lot to me to have support under such difficult circumstances. Bugler 13:13, 11 December 2008 (EST)

You're welcome! --₮K/Talk! 13:36, 11 December 2008 (EST)

  • While we may not be able to control all that happens to us, we can control what happens inside us.

--Benjamin Franklin

  • To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

--Thomas Paine

GabMartinez's IP

I'm not very good with technological stuff...

I noticed you blocked the IP of a vandal that I had just blocked. Doesn't it already block someone's IP if i don't disable autoblock? Please let me know. I'd love to make my future bocks more effectual. Thanks. --Ben Talk 14:17, 11 December 2008 (EST)

Hi, Ben! I sent you an email through the wiki, 'splainin. --₮K/Talk! 14:28, 11 December 2008 (EST)

Got it, Thanks!--Ben Talk 14:35, 11 December 2008 (EST)


As per the comments on Bugler's talkpage yesterday under PhilipV I have looked at the current article on Scotland and reckon the main part is now of the sort of level that is acceptable to almost all. The more contentious parts have been moved elsewhere. I could quibble, but that is all it would be. A word here and there. Additions by people who know the place and don't have too many bees in their bonnets. There is a gap in the history, which can be filled when the monarchs are finished.

My beef is with the Monarchs section. PhilipV has headed each one complete with dates of rule, which is a pain for someone like me who is trying to link them with English history and have to actually get on to the relevant article, find out the dates, instead of just writing, say, Malcolm III. Yes, I can Redirect, but I shouldn't have to. He says it's so they don't get mixed up with others of the same name, but has he not heard of Disambig'...? ( I don't know how to do that either, but I will find out!)

The articles themselves desperately need going over. Whilst they seem to be OK fact-wise, some need expanding and they all need the green pencil. The typing is dreadful, (his use of the shift key is positively feral!)and there is insufficient linking on many of them. (Even when he links a king to his predecessor, the link doesn't work because he hasn't put in the dates - see Malcolm III (1057-1093) with the unsuccessful link to David I)

I am willing do this; but if I go in I will need back up. I have no clout at all, and he has already told me to, um, scram. Then again, you might agree with him... Cheers AlanE 15:13, 15 December 2008 (EST)

AlanE, I welcome anyone who is willing to help, so long as the facts are verifiable with cite links, etc. When one goes to edit, they see a message. Anyone who is telling you not to edit (save an Administrator), please refer them to that message. What I see is confusion and bad formating on Scotland and all efforts to help improve it would be welcome. If there are disputes, let me know, and I will either try to resolve it, or get an administrator involved. --₮K/Talk! 19:06, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Gallery of American Heroes

There is something wrong in the access counter. Could you fix it? --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:45, 17 December 2008 (EST)

  • Yes, the work of our friend Ames and his little clubhouse buddies, Joaquín. I cannot delete or move pages, but you can. Copy the content into notepad or the like, delete the page, then re-create it, paste everything back in. that will reset the counter. --₮K/Talk! 19:24, 17 December 2008 (EST)
Thank you Terry. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 20:04, 17 December 2008 (EST)


Are non-Sysops allowed to use the welcome template? JY23 16:09, 21 December 2008 (EST)

  • Yes. And the terminology is changing somewhat, here. Administrators and Senior Administrators are now what we used to call "sysops", generically. Now there are more rights levels, even among them, and more and more rights are granted "as needed", blurring the lines even more. Suffice to say, you are more than welcome to WELCOME users, and provide the template that might be of great help, navigating the editing pitfalls here. Caveat: Make sure you check the contribs to make sure you are not welcoming an obvious vandal, or someone already blocked (which I have done often!) --₮K/Talk! 17:06, 21 December 2008 (EST)
Ah, I see. That is quite confusing, but I did need those upload rights. :-) JY23 17:56, 21 December 2008 (EST)
  • More times than not, around here, those things come as a result of not asking for them, and oftentimes someone else seeing your work, and letting Andy know you should be considered. Things come and go in life....check out the lyrics to "That's Life" ;-) --₮K/Talk! 18:16, 21 December 2008 (EST)


I am a big fan of Fall Out Boy. I have obtained a vast amount of knowledge of this band. I would like permission to add all the information to the conservapedia page of Fall Out Boy. I am asking permission because it is a great amount of information and it would add a lot. Oh, and another thing is, another band I like does not have a page. We The Kings. They are a popular band nationally. I was wondering if a page could be created for them. Thanks. Please respond as soon as possible. AdamKosmak 21:39, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Adam, I'll respond immediately: do yourself a favor and improve an educational entry or two first.--aschlafly 21:43, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Photo for Krysg

That photo you uploaded, I had already done under Image:Tut's Coffin.jpg. Would you mind removing either duplicate? And I also uploaded the other one about the painting. Thanks for understanding. JY23 17:14, 22 December 2008 (EST)

  • Sorry, I cannot delete pages, or remove images. Guess we better find a better way to communicate, and stop duplication of efforts, somehow. --₮K/Talk! 17:18, 22 December 2008 (EST)
Which one do you want me to delete? --DeanStalk 18:23, 22 December 2008 (EST)
Dean, I don't know which Krysg used, but I assume he used the ones from JY23. I didn't go back and check, and neither responded to me...sorry. --₮K/Talk! 18:38, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Sorry abt. confusion guys. I used the file Tut_coffinette.jpg in pharaoh --Krysg 18:56, 22 December 2008 (EST)

That would be TK's. I uploaded Tut's Coffin.jpg. Please delete that one. JY23 18:58, 22 December 2008 (EST)
I uploaded the second, too....what about that one? --₮K/Talk! 19:06, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Merry Christmas!!

Merry Christmas!!----PhilipV I Support our Troops! 07:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)


Was blocked for being a "liberal parodist", something about putting a velociraptor in the Triumphal Entry story. JY23 14:28, 28 December 2008 (EST)

  • Yes. TerryH's keen eye spotted it. And you reported it to me, because? Confused here. Well, always a balance between welcoming too late, and not doing it at all, lol. --₮K/Talk! 14:33, 28 December 2008 (EST)

about my block (the last one)

I understand why you blocked me about the comment - but gossip? what gossip? please specify an example of gossip. I already have incriminating evidence for several users concerning gossip. (what counts as gossip anyway?) ----PhilipV I Support our Troops! 22:55, 28 December 2008 (EST)

  • You have emailed me several times, PhilipV. I suggest you do so to discuss this. Gossip referred to edits without citation, being merely gossip, for purposes of an encyclopedia. --₮K/Talk! 23:45, 28 December 2008 (EST)

Ah, now i finally understand what people mean by 'gossip' . P.S. What is a 'troll' on CP? ---- 50 star flag.png PhilipV I Support our Troops! 08:37, 1 January 2009 (EST)


Thinks that Malcolm X was an 'adoption success story'. As I am currently without powers, could you take a look? Thanks and Happy New Year. Bugler 13:31, 31 December 2008 (EST)

Where do you want me to go and see? Please provide links, or email me. --₮K/Talk! 14:43, 31 December 2008 (EST)


Congratulations on your promotion to Sysop (Admin) status! This gives you many new privileges. Well deserved!--aschlafly 23:45, 31 December 2008 (EST)

God bless, Andy. I know 2009 will be a momentous year for you (for all of us) and Conservapedia! --₮K/Talk! 23:56, 31 December 2008 (EST)

Congrats Terry. What a great way to start 2009. I hope you can work with me on the news project, etc. --DeanStalk 01:17, 1 January 2009 (EST)

and from one promotee to another - congratulations! let us make 2009 special. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 06:27, 1 January 2009 (EST)
Yes, Jessica, I agree, and right back at you! --₮K/Talk! 07:00, 1 January 2009 (EST)

Happy New Year!

Congrats and Happy new year! WesleySHello! 23:54, 31 December 2008 (EST)

Thank you for your message to me, and my congratulations on your promotion.--TerryHTalk 06:38, 1 January 2009 (EST)

Happy new year and congratulations on getting all your privileges back. BrianCo 09:52, 1 January 2009 (EST)


As it says in the title, Congrats on the good news in the New Year. You've been kind and helpful to this new user, and I'm glad to see you rewarded for the service. JakeWildebeast

Thanks, Jake, that was very kind of you. Happy New Year to you too! --₮K/Talk! 07:12, 1 January 2009 (EST)

The new Sysops

Congratulations! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 09:02, 1 January 2009 (EST)

Congratulations TK! Happy New Year. Let this be a great year at Conservapedia. User:AddisonDM 1 January 2009

Thanks, AddisonDM! Same back at you. --₮K/Talk! 18:53, 1 January 2009 (EST)
Sorry, Joaquín my amigo, I missed your post completely! Thank you. --₮KAdministrator/Talk! 01:47, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Congratulations on your promotion! --DinsdaleP 13:17, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks, DinsdaleP! --₮K/Administrator/Talk 13:29, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Protecting images

Congratulations again on your promotion to Sysop. Now you can protect the images you upload. Here's one of yours: [1] --DeanStalk 09:59, 1 January 2009 (EST)


Thanks for the fix! ;) CPWebmaster 16:45, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Fix? If I deserve thanks, I can assure you it is most likely accidently! Ahh, yes! I am indeed a one letter wonder! --₮KAdministrator/Talk! 01:48, 3 January 2009 (EST)


Why was this reverted? CPWebmaster 00:22, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Philip, it was discussed on Andy's page, and the part about the's an old joke, always retreating, never fighting. So, since only the line "sounding retreat" was there, it did indeed make me feel it was subtle parody. --₮KAdministrator/Talk! 01:51, 3 January 2009 (EST)
Understood. Thanks. CPWebmaster 11:05, 3 January 2009 (EST)


TK, thanks for keeping a vigilant eye in my absence over the holidays. When users start causing trouble in a niche subject, they think they can sow doubt and marginalize the limited number of editors safeguarding those pages. But once they step out into more open terrain, their troublemaking becomes plain as day. AndyJM, AlanS, BRichtigen... they've all revealed their true colors. I hate saying "I told you so", but... sigh.

Anyway, it's good to be back in 2009 with some new blood in the team to keep us on track and full speed ahead. Happy New Year, TK. -Foxtrot 01:13, 3 January 2009 (EST)

  • You're most welcome, Foxtrot. Although I have to dispute the "new blood" part, at least on my part...I'm just a re-tread! :p --₮KAdministrator/Talk! 01:46, 3 January 2009 (EST)
Wow, I knew you had been here before me, but now I actually went all the way back in your contribs. You're really "old"! Sure you're not over the hill? hehe. Well, as long as your ticker keeps going, it's good to have you back on board, old guy! :-) -Foxtrot 02:00, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Did you see the talk page?

The search seventies gets 189 searches a day via the 3 top search engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN). The search The Seventies gets 56 searches a day. Moving the article title back to Seventies.conservative 18:45, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Results 1 - 30 of about 3,640,000 for The Seventies. (0.24 seconds) Google
Results 1 - 30 of about 9,440,000 for Seventies [definition]. (0.27 seconds) Google
However those search results for the numerical, include searches for the Cardinal Number, and the numerical 1970's, Conservative. You are getting a false result. Check it out. And kindly be polite enough to explain, which you didn't until later. Thanks. --₮K/Administrator/Talk 18:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)


Good call there, I think. Between his (deleted) "shake a leg" post and querying my blocks, I have had reason to keep my eye on him too. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 07:26, 6 January 2009 (EST)

  • Thanks, Jessica. I notice everything, remember just as much. ;-) --₮K/Administrator/Talk 09:55, 6 January 2009 (EST)


Yes I saw the notice. That is okay because I am a sysop anyway. Thank you. User:AddisonDM 6 January 2009

  • Yes, Addison, I know you are an Administrator. The vandalism last night occurred because a template that a sysop edited was left unlocked, hence my calling it to your attention. ;-) --₮K/Administrator/Talk 14:28, 6 January 2009 (EST)


Thanks for your help regarding some references. As for the H-bomb one, I recall reading it in a book by Bill Bryson (maybe 'Notes from a Big Country', but probably 'The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid (and I heartily recommend both)). As for the Oxbridge article, I would be glad to expand it when I have the time. ETrundel 13:58, 7 January 2009 (EST)

  • A funny side-bar to that Oxbridge deal, like your recent experience with another article, I almost deleted it, remembering from the deep recess of memory, only the part it was once not a "real" term! Checking of course, showed that it is a term brought to reality from fantasy. You are not alone!:p --₮K/Administrator/Talk 14:42, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Are we at war?

Thanks for this quote and ref, but I'm less of a professor than Richard Dawkins. --Ed Poor/Hon. Professor Talk 17:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)

  • I rather think you are more of one than deceitful Dawkins! The problem with Fiorina's assumptions, bless him, is his "evidence" basis is his interpretation of exit polling. We've discussed polling before; You set 14 monkeys in a room, 5 of them are bound to see the data a different way. Same for Cancer research, or HIV/AID's. --₮K/Administrator/Talk 18:18, 7 January 2009 (EST)


Why thank you! I guess I should do more blocks :) User:AddisonDM 7 January 2009

Thanks Tk, just watch me. I pity those fools.--Jpatt 23:10, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 :D --₮K/Administrator/Talk 23:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Your block of AmeliaJ

TK, you just blocked AmeliaJ the other day for "Liberal parodist: Virginity article gibberish and wrong edit comments and removal of link, etc. Also using proxies." There is no liberal parody or gibberish. The ONLY change she made was deleting a link b/c apparantly when she clicked it she got an error message about it being inappropriate. In her own words: "I got this huge "Acsess denied" sign on my computer screen. It said that you have to be 18 to get into the site. So I assumed that it was not a family friendly site and needed to be removed. So I removed it." That was all. She said as much in her edit comment, only with a few misspellings. Furthermore, she doesn't know what proxies means (and frankly TK neither do I). The reason I have her own words is that I have been talking with her lately and believe me, she is not a liberal parodist b/c she also has an account on Wikipedia with many conservative userboxes. If it means anything, she also has asperger's syndrome. I am sorry this is so long, but I want you to rethink this block. I think it is unjustified. User:AddisonDM 9 January 2009

  • Thanks, Addison. Yes, I did. And yes, I will think about it again. --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:28, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Your block of User:HelpJazz

Was in direct violation of the of Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia. I think it would be best if you unblocked him. -- JArneal 19:59, 9 January 2009 (EST)

  • I actually pity you, JArneal, if you cannot distinguish between free speech, and being part of a group (an Administrator of one, no less!) proven to endorse, condone and plan disruption, deception and trolling. Given that you seemingly cannot discern the difference, I wonder if you have the faculties to edit an encyclopedia project.....--₮K/Admin/Talk 20:28, 9 January 2009 (EST)
Personal tools