User talk:TonyPark

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, TonyPark, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, TonyPark!

--James Wilson 12:19, 7 January 2012 (EST)

Block of Adambro

Have you used the checkuser tool for that ?--PhilipN 16:22, 11 January 2012 (EST)

No, I don't believe I have access to the CheckUser tool. It's under Special Pages, right? I wasn't able to find it. My decision to block Adambro came from analyzing his contributions. He has a large number of very minor edits and talk page posts, mostly pushing liberal POV. He also seemed to clean up the vandalism within a minute of each attack happening, as though he were trying to "build cred" with the site. Mostly, he was an argumentative liberal nitpicker who didn't feel the need to contribute anything to the site. TonyPark 16:34, 11 January 2012 (EST)
By the way, I just check your contributions and I wonder how fast you got your block rights: 1st article on the 6th, then mostly contributions in Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists. that shows how much you love your pseudo-science of Evolution, then you got your block rights on the 9th ! I unblocked Adambro‎, feel free to discuss the matter with me. Reverting vandalism in less than 2 minutes does not prove anything. --PhilipN 16:35, 11 January 2012 (EST)
I'm not interested in a blocking war with you. I blocked Adambro out of a genuine concern that he is a deep-cover parodist. My belief in evolution is irrelevant. I think it is very curious that he was able to revert long stretches of vandalism by two vandals with very similar names almost immediately after they happened. If you could do me a favor, run CheckUser on Adambro, BL4NK3R, and BU99ERY and make sure that they don't have similar IPs. Thanks. TonyPark 16:53, 11 January 2012 (EST)
I'm not interested neither in a blocking war. I just feel we shouldn't block users without valid accusations. You made a good case and Adambro should be warned and monitored but I don't feel he deserved an infinite block (except if he really is a sockpuppet). Twice he reverted vandalism really quick but this does not prove anything, I have done that before. I do not have the rights to use the checkuser, you may want to check this list. --PhilipN 17:02, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Thank you for the help and information. I will be more cautious from now on. TonyPark 17:18, 11 January 2012 (EST)
You are welcome but be careful, I haven't seen a lot of people win an edit war against a senior admin, however legitimate it may be.--PhilipN 17:42, 11 January 2012 (EST)


How can you block people who don't have a first name and last initial username when you yourself don't follow the policy? You're banning innocent users that want to join. DynaboyJ 17:54, 13 January 2012 (EST)

My real name is Anthony Parker, so TonyPark is a perfectly acceptable name under the policy, the point of which is to keep frivolous, anti-intellectual usernames out. Besides, its not like I permanently banned them, they can just go and make a new account with an acceptable user name. TonyPark 19:55, 13 January 2012 (EST)

Actually, he can, and will, unblock himself. Ayzmo :) 20:26, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Then he'll come after you. SammyP 20:27, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Yeah, but he knows he has lost the respect of this site, blocking me is irrelevant.TonyPark 20:33, 13 January 2012 (EST)
From what I see, he has no right to take any action against you. If he were to take action, it would do little more than further reveal his questionable tactics on this site. However, I can't help but feel that blocking him was an act of provocation. If he decides to block you, it would be your own doing, even if it isn't deserved. --RedGoliath 01:36, 14 January 2012 (GMT)
Conservative's grasp on reality is erratic. He divides the world into two categories; good moral Christians who naturally support his crusading efforts, and liberal atheists who hate him because they are perverse, he relishes their disapproval and their attention. Check his block log, your message isn't going to sink in, after all your obviously a liberal atheist and probably gay. He will find a way to accommodate the facts to his worldview. Conservative should be sympathized with not disliked, remember that he truly believes everything he says. His articles are an expression of what is going on in his mind. Can you imagine living in that world? SammyP 20:45, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Conservative is not my concern. I want the site to see how ridiculous he is. He has a vested interest in keeping his fingers lodged firmly in his ears.TonyPark 20:52, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Oh, everyone already sees that. But Conservative writes materiel that generates a lot of page views, and he contributes massively to the site, he contribute something like a quarter of the edits. And as long as Conservative keeps pumping out content Andy will give him free a hand; despite whatever impact editing might be having on Conservatives mental health and whatever impact his behavior has on the overall community. Notice how often Andy keeps crowing over vague increases in site traffic. He doesn't seem to care whether people are coming here to laugh at us. It's the ratings that matter and Conservative is great for ratings. SammyP 21:02, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Well, even he can agree that his name is in violation of naming policy. Its a fairly straightforward issue, perhaps he should have read the Conservapedia Commandments before he started editing.
You are amazing, Tony Park. I have been waiting to see Conservative fought against since before I got this account, but I was worried about being blocked. DynaboyJ 21:34, 13 January 2012 (EST)
I am not amazing, I am just trying to have a constructive dialog on this site, as are the vast majority of us, but Conservative's ramblings make it almost impossible. I will oppose his kind as long as they keep dragging the name of Jesus Christ through the mud. TonyPark 21:37, 13 January 2012 (EST)


That was a very good block. Thanks! ThankYouTonyPark 20:28, 13 January 2012 (EST)

90/10 Rule

Please see the 90/10 Rule.--Andy Schlafly 22:10, 13 January 2012 (EST)