Wikipedia on bestiality

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The atheist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia). Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-evolution academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at Princeton University.[1] See: Atheism and bestiality

Bestiality is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The Wikipedia project was initiated by atheist Jimmy Wales and the agnostic philosophy professor Larry Sanger on January 15, 2001.[2] An irony of internet history is that Jimmy Wales, despite being an atheist, refers to himself as Wikipedia's "spiritual leader".[3] Despite its official "neutrality policy," Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.

As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on zoophilia/bestiality has an entire section on "arguments for zoophilia" plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on "arguments against zoophilia". No worthwhile encyclopedia in existence has an article on zoophilia/bestiality with an entire section on "arguments for zoophilia" plus pictures depicting zoophilia. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a "Zoophilia and the law" article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.[4]

Given various comments within the atheist and evolutionist communities concerning bestiality, it is not surprising that the liberal leaning Wikipedia has the content it does on bestiality (see: Atheism and bestiality and Evolutionary belief and bestiality). Liberals are more likely to believe in evolutionary pseudoscience. Also, since World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism have been atheists.[5]

See also

Notes

Personal tools