Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mathoreilly"
From Conservapedia
(postulates) |
Mathoreilly (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:The postulates section. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | :The postulates section. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | yeah, but what part of it?--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 22:42, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:42, July 2, 2008
Can you write about quantum mechanics in a way that a bright high school student could follow your meaning? --Ed Poor Talk 21:10, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
- What I have written is not graduate-level material, it's college-level. Quantum mechanics is, after all, a college-level subject. If someone is interested in learning quantum mechanics and comes to this page, I think it would be nice to have the essential postulates of the subject summarized precisely and succinctly. If people want a more general description of the theory as well, they should by all means add that to the beginning of the section. Unfortunately, there's no way that I know of to simplify the material I added to make it accessible to a high school audience. For those people who have the necessary background to even begin to study quantum mechanics (calculus and linear algebra), the material I added should be accessible.--Mathoreilly 22:06, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
- Well, I have a year of high school physics and a year of college physics, and I can't understand it. I might be stupid (seriously, I'm considering this), but on the other hand it might just be that the topic deserves a better explanation and that we haven't found a suitable author yet.
Well, what don't you understand or recognize? That will help me a lot to determine what needs to be changed. The more specific you are, the better a job I can do. --Mathoreilly 22:23, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
yeah, but what part of it?--Mathoreilly 22:42, 1 July 2008 (EDT)